Late rhs x-mas present

[raedor 8]

never had that. but i wasnt killed often in a tank. i don't play ctis, so i don't know how to fix it... but we'll see

[Sigma-6 29]

The fan mount on the back of that Enigma simply indicates that that particular Enigma was modded off a Chinese bought Type-69II. (The Type-69II has a modified engine) Not all Enigmas were modded off this tank, a lot were built on T-55s, and thus the model is accurate in that respect.

A pic of another Enigma based on a Russian T-55

[cornhelium 0]

Hi,

About the Flamethrower script - would it be possible to incorporate it into the .pbo using the fired eventhandler? Eg. configure the tank with a harmless, soundless, rapid fire weapon called "Flamethrower", then have the script triggered by the fired eventhandler? Excuse my ignorance - I may be talking nonsense  

The Operation Sci-Fi mod have a Flamer tank in near-release state for their Warhammer mod. It looks like they've got their flamethrower working without user-scripting - I quote:

"...i have stubled on a method that requires no scripting by the user (its all done in the config) and no placement of triggers or any of that annoying crap, its simple, u place the addon in ur addons directory, run ofp, put the flamer guy in a mission or waht ever, and bobs ur uncle, u have a working flamethrower that works, i.e. it actually damages things."

Link to this thread:

http://www.flashpoint1985.com/cgi-bin....t=32192

Here's a link to their website:

http://scifi.the-spectrum.org/lobby/

Beautiful tanks anyway - congratulations  

[raedor 8]

yes, if we include an flamethrower it'll be as you said: a "invisible" bullet and a fired EH...

[miles teg 1]

Are you sure that Operation Sci-Fi is using invisible bullets for their flame thrower???

Chris G.

aka-Miles Teg<GD>

[Peter_13 0]

Sigma-6

Can you look at Iraq division signs on T-55's, they contain words and it seems they are mirrored. (something like that L-R gun R-L, but need to be L-R gun L-R). But maybe I'm wrong.

Thanks, Peter.

[soul_assassin 1739]

I actually added the markings and there is indeed text signifying Qadisiyah Saddam. It is indeed mirrored on some tanks. Sorry for that.

[M9ACE 0]

Hi there Sigma-6,

I never inferred that all Enigmas were based on Type69-IIs. I am well educated with the nuances of the T54/T55 FOV (only the ones I care about). Perhaps a re-read of my previous post is in order.

It was just a coincidence that the Enigma picture that I linked to was based on a Type69-II, I was not inferring that they all are like that.

[lee_h._oswald 0]

Another problem with the tank pack.

I am using "RHS_NoScripts = true" in my cti, everything is fine.

T55 and T64 can be used without any problem.

So I gave the resistance T-54.

If you kill one, the smoke and explosions effects appear, everythings fine now.

But when you came to a city after a while where a T-54 was killed some time ago, you get a CTD.

Is the T-xx model changing to a wreck when it´s burned out?

I hope a update will come soon.

MfG Lee

[Sigma-6 29]

@ Jan. 06 2004,08:26)]Hi there Sigma-6,

I never inferred that all Enigmas were based on Type69-IIs. I am well educated with the nuances of the T54/T55 FOV (only the ones I care about). Perhaps a re-read of my previous post is in order.

It was just a coincidence that the Enigma picture that I linked to was based on a Type69-II, I was not inferring that they all are like that.

I'm aware of that, the oversight was not yours.

[raedor 8]

@lee: yes, i worked the last 4 hours on the update, i'm sure you'll get it in the next seven days...

in the update not only one script will start when you write rhs_noscripts=true. no, we don't change the model... i have no idea why it crashed. i get with t-55s update no more ctds. i bombed 63*4 t-55s with a friend in mp, it didn't crash (was a bit laggy)

[da_ofp_man 0]

Still waiting for those updatet T-55 and finale T-64.but one question is coming to my mind are you going to do new interior in future releases tank packs like t-64,t-72,t-80,t-90 because the bis ones really sucks and dont fit in your new shiny tanks

[lee_h._oswald 0]

@lee: yes, i worked the last 4 hours on the update, i'm sure you'll get it in the next seven days...

in the update not only one script will start when you write rhs_noscripts=true. no, we don't change the model... i have no idea why it crashed. i get with t-55s update no more ctds. i bombed 63*4 t-55s with a friend in mp, it didn't crash (was a bit laggy)  

Good to hear.

One question on the T64s.

Comparing with sigma´s T-72s, where to sort in the T64s.

Firepower and armour.

"T-55A" , "T-55AM2" , "T-64B" , "T-64BVK" , "T-72M1" , "T-72B"

Is this correct or is a T-64BVK better then T-72M1?

I have the feeling that the T-64BVK is the better survivor in the battlefield.

MfG Lee

[raedor 8]

yes, generally you can say that t-64s are better than t-72s (maybe some updates not). t-72s are mostly for export...

final version of t-64s will come later, our primary target are "bugfree" t-55s.

[lee_h._oswald 0]

Thx again.

MfG Lee

[soul_assassin 1739]

Still waiting for those updatet T-55 and finale T-64.but one question is coming to my mind are you going to do new interior in future releases tank packs like t-64,t-72,t-80,t-90 because the bis ones really sucks and dont fit in your new shiny tanks

they might suck but they are realistic and detailed so if there is no need for major remodeling then no.

[da_ofp_man 0]

Quote[/b] ]they might suck but they are realistic and detailed so if there is no need for major remodeling then no

hmm maybe the interiors are realistic but for older versions tanks now the last production series of russian tanks have totally difrent equipment inside and for the totally new tanks as OPLOT and BLACK EAGLE they interior dont have even their counterpart in bis made interiors.

[soul_assassin 1739]

the tanks all have correct interiors, the newer ones have modern equipment.

[Evil Weasel 0]

Returning to the possibility of a flamethrower version of the T-55,there is a working flamethrower as part of mapfact's improved a.i. addon! (mapfact).

As far as I can see it works without external scripting and it's certainly great fun to use.

Hope that this is usefull.

[raedor 8]

we know this addon, i'm member of mapfact.

[Evil Weasel 0]

Sorry,I didn't realise

[raedor 8]

update is delayed a small time cos of new patch.

maybe you'll get less ctd's, 1.95 readme says:

Quote[/b] ]1.95 - Fixed: Bug in animation loading. As a result some 3rd party addons with custom animation could cause a crash.

[da_ofp_man 0]

update is delayed a small time cos of new patch.

maybe you'll get less ctd's, 1.95 readme says:

Quote[/b] ]1.95  - Fixed: Bug in animation loading. As a result some 3rd party addons with custom animation could cause a crash.

     

nooooo!!! hmmm then must wait must wait hopfully not long

[soul_assassin 1739]

Also would like to tell u that the final T64 pack will not only have all the bugs patched up but will also feature new versions of the tank, certainly one new, maybe more.

[da_ofp_man 0]

Also would like to tell u that the final T64 pack will not only have all the bugs patched up but will also feature new versions of the tank, certainly one new, maybe more.

cool and will in this release the tanks have a camo scheme not only one color olive green