R0adki11 3949 Posted September 17, 2017 Thread cleaned up, there is no place on this forum for belittling and flame-baiting comments. 4 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted September 18, 2017 I added the file offsets to my first post so you can edit the limit yourself if you want to. 9001 fps is also available now. Because I initially wanted a limitless binary and people are still hitting the 200 fps limit which I never expected to be reached :D I'd be very interested in diag_captureFrame logs from the Server using the latest profv2 binary with the 9001 fps limit. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
computer 113 Posted September 24, 2017 8 Players reporting "very smooth experience". But I never told them anything. So I assume it's not completely placebo. ~150 avg. on server. Dropped to ~50 during most intense combat. I'll prep some tvt scenarios, because I'm interested if this will remove a lot of kill trading? In theory it should. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R0adki11 3949 Posted September 27, 2017 On 24/09/2017 at 7:25 AM, computer said: I'll prep some tvt scenarios, because I'm interested if this will remove a lot of kill trading? In theory it should. Not always, depends on many factors. Body armour and weapons used against players. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gogsworld 15 Posted October 5, 2017 @dedmen Are you planning to make a version for the new 1.76 hotifx version that's just come out? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 5, 2017 3 hours ago, gogsworld said: @dedmen Are you planning to make a version for the new 1.76 hotifx version that's just come out? Tomorrow. about 14 hours from now. I hope. I should have time for it. Won't make one for the hotfix though. Only perf/prof branch. So the newest perf build will be done. Afaik you also don't need the hotfix binaries serverside. But being outdated is always somehow bad. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gogsworld 15 Posted October 5, 2017 OK. The latest perf build is based on the 1.76 hotfix anyway if I read Dwarden's note on the perf build properly. So, all good. Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 6, 2017 18 hours ago, gogsworld said: OK. The latest perf build is based on the 1.76 hotfix anyway if I read Dwarden's note on the perf build properly. So, all good. Thanks I just added profv5 for x86/x64 and also Linux server. with 9000fps on windows and 1000 on linux 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Neviothr 102 Posted October 6, 2017 Not over 9000? Pff. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gogsworld 15 Posted October 6, 2017 4 hours ago, dedmen said: I just added profv5 for x86/x64 and also Linux server. with 9000fps on windows and 1000 on linux No windows server version? All I can see on the link is client and linux server... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 6, 2017 1 hour ago, gogsworld said: No windows server version? All I can see on the link is client and linux server... Oh gosh I'm dumb... :D Give me half an hour :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ry4nD 84 Posted October 10, 2017 Can we get just like the original 1, the 100 fps version I've found to be the best for my servers, and I haven't quite figured out how to update the binary myself yet No rush, whenever you have time mate, I am still rocking the original 100 fps version and it's still goin strong! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 10, 2017 5 hours ago, RCANTEC-RyanD- said: Can we get just like the original 1, the 100 fps version I've found to be the best for my servers, and I haven't quite figured out how to update the binary myself yet No rush, whenever you have time mate, I am still rocking the original 100 fps version and it's still goin strong! Why were the other versions worse than the 100fps one? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ry4nD 84 Posted October 11, 2017 Not really sure tried it on 3 of my servers and I found a reduction in FPS, from 5-30 server side. The 100 FPS version I have a solid 95-70 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kuplion 18 Posted October 16, 2017 @dedmen, What are we looking for, so as to edit the other/newer exes? I've done some compares and up until v05 I could find the same values to edit but v07 does not seem to have the same values. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 21, 2017 On 16.10.2017 at 2:58 AM, kuplion said: @dedmen, What are we looking for, so as to edit the other/newer exes? I've done some compares and up until v05 I could find the same values to edit but v07 does not seem to have the same values. You have to remind me to add the addresses. Just added v7 x64 windows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kuplion 18 Posted October 21, 2017 9 hours ago, dedmen said: You have to remind me to add the addresses. Just added v7 x64 windows. Cheers. Could you do performance builds too? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 22, 2017 13 hours ago, kuplion said: Cheers. Could you do performance builds too? I can but no. Profiling is better for this as this also allows to easily get performance logs. Which is what this test is about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kuplion 18 Posted October 22, 2017 6 hours ago, dedmen said: I can but no. Profiling is better for this as this also allows to easily get performance logs. Which is what this test is about. Umm..ok then. Some of us have actually been using the performance builds on live servers with great success. Nevermind, we'll go back to the normal performance builds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 23, 2017 19 hours ago, kuplion said: Umm..ok then. Some of us have actually been using the performance builds on live servers with great success. Nevermind, we'll go back to the normal performance builds. I'm personally running profiling most of the time. Could never notice any performance difference between profiling and performance versions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kuplion 18 Posted October 23, 2017 1 minute ago, dedmen said: I'm personally running profiling most of the time. Could never notice any performance difference between profiling and performance versions. Would you be able to clue me in as to how you detect the correct position to edit? I see it seems to have changed in v07 but I cannot find the correct position, even when using the modified profiling exe as a reference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
das attorney 858 Posted October 23, 2017 Why don't you run the profiling build, then he gets the data he needs faster, and if all's good then this can maybe get in the stock game faster. If everyone started editing performance builds, then there's no data and no progress, and no-one benefits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kuplion 18 Posted October 23, 2017 1 minute ago, das attorney said: Why don't you run the profiling build, then he gets the data he needs faster, and if all's good then this can maybe get in the stock game faster. If everyone started editing performance builds, then there's no data and no progress, and no-one benefits. It's as much for my curiosity as anything else at this point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dedmen 2700 Posted October 23, 2017 3 hours ago, kuplion said: Would you be able to clue me in as to how you detect the correct position to edit? I see it seems to have changed in v07 but I cannot find the correct position, even when using the modified profiling exe as a reference. No I won't. BI wouldn't like that. And as I said. Profiling build doesn't create any noticeable performance problems. And it a contains the same performance improvements as the performance build. I don't see why I should put about 20 minutes of work into something that's completely unnecessary. So just use profiling build. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kuplion 18 Posted October 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, dedmen said: No I won't. BI wouldn't like that. And as I said. Profiling build doesn't create any noticeable performance problems. And it a contains the same performance improvements as the performance build. I don't see why I should put about 20 minutes of work into something that's completely unnecessary. So just use profiling build. Wow.. I'll just stick to the normal binary then if that's the attitude you take. I asked politely so that I could learn, and in future make the modifications myself, but have it your way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
