why are all the drones/ uavs the same design?

[Qosmius 10]

is it only me who thinks its strange the drones have exactly the same design? as in 100 threads before this is another example of how they just reskin units and give 0 faction variety...since all factions get the same unit they still havent made 3d cockpits for tanks/apc which is a shame..have a good day bis, i wonder what you really do at your work. hire some proffesional 3d modders, 3-4 3d makers can make a unit each in a matter of day or two so i dont see the problem, get the finger out

[roberthammer 582]

I guess these models been on low priority list and yes same thing goes to SDVs etc

I wish CSAT had Cypher UAV instead - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_Cypher , yes its old but still looks futuristic + can be armed with mg

---------- Post added at 12:08 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------

also this is great site about existing UAVs - http://www.vectorsite.net/twdrn.html

[liquidpinky 11]

I wish CSAT had Cypher UAV instead - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_Cypher , yes its old but still looks futuristic + can be armed with mg

---------- Post added at 12:08 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------

also this is great site about existing UAVs - http://www.vectorsite.net/twdrn.html

Us Metal Gear fans think alike. :)

[Ash712 1]

Us Metal Gear fans think alike. :)

Ineed. ;)

[cozza 24]

suprised noone has made one for Arma2 yet

[roberthammer 582]

suprised noone has made one for Arma2 yet

Hmm - i seen this recently , Kol9yN created the Cypher model

[nodunit 397]

Ineed. ;)

There's only enough room in the world for one big boss.

[nmdanny 22]

It's strange that the AAF retextured variant of the UAV is still called as "MQ-4A Greyhawk" yet the CSAT retextured variant is called "K-40 Ababil-3", same as with the Stomper(AAF+NATO) and the Saif(CSAT), who are using the same models, and the Darter and Tayran drones(which to be fair, are both called AR-2 so maybe they're supposed to be retextured only.)

My optimistic guess is that they still haven't modelled the Ababil and Saif drones, so they're using the NATO/AAF version as a placeholder. But given their history with other scrapped vehicles, they might all keep using the same name.

[hellfire257 3]

I really do hope they're placeholders. I'm not bothered by most of the omissions, but this is really annoying.

[RushHour 11]

Some guy on youtube stuck an AK47 on one of those quadrocopter drones. Now that was some crazy stuff.

[dwaight 17]

I guess these models been on low priority list and yes same thing goes to SDVs etc

I wish CSAT had Cypher UAV instead - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_Cypher , yes its old but still looks futuristic + can be armed with mg

---------- Post added at 12:08 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------

also this is great site about existing UAVs - http://www.vectorsite.net/twdrn.html

i remember them from Metal Gear Solid.