sickboy 13 Posted February 4, 2013 Is there any chance of getting a comment on this now? Sure here you go, a comment ;-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eddieck 10 Posted February 4, 2013 Sure here you go, a comment ;-) Haha, I thought maybe I should have worded it differently! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sickboy 13 Posted February 4, 2013 Haha, I thought maybe I should have worded it differently! Heh, at least it would reduce the chance of someone (like me...) exploiting it with cheap humor :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gossamersolid 155 Posted February 8, 2013 If they aren't going to implement Java or another language, we need some more commands and abilities added to SQF. They added quite a bit between ArmA 1 and ArmA 2, I hope that trend continues. I'd love to see native support for database/ I/O without the need of external DLLs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
metalcraze 290 Posted February 8, 2013 Most importantly they shouldn't replace SQF with anything to retain compatibility. Would be great if Java was executed like it is for webpages and stuff, as a separate code/scripts that are called. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alwarren 2766 Posted February 8, 2013 Most importantly they shouldn't replace SQF with anything to retain compatibility. Would be great if Java was executed like it is for webpages and stuff, as a separate code/scripts that are called. Could still work via file extension/exec call. You could still run SQS files via "exec", and SQF via "execVM". Nothing would stop them from adding an "execLUA" or "execJVM" call to the fray, in fact, I do hope they do that. No point in replacing SQF because there's still a lot of stuff written in SQF that is very much relevant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eddieck 10 Posted February 8, 2013 Most importantly they shouldn't replace SQF with anything to retain compatibility. Would be great if Java was executed like it is for webpages and stuff, as a separate code/scripts that are called. Agreed, breaking backwards compatibility would be a ridiculous idea right now. Luckily: Note: this will not replace SQF scripting, so the transition should be smooth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chortles 263 Posted February 9, 2013 So is that Java implementation "in addition to"/supplementing SQF? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eddieck 10 Posted February 9, 2013 So is that Java implementation "in addition to"/supplementing SQF? That seems to have been their plan a year ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
