Dwarden 1125 Posted September 7, 2012 http://www.arma2.com/beta-patch.php mirror : http://www.gamefront.com/files/22223405/ARMA2_OA_Build_96751.zip more stability fixes quite some crashfixes included, some debug traps for tracked issues several other betas regressions shall be fixed too suggested to be used for server hosting as it shall be noticeably stabler (if you still get any crashes, it's very important for us to get server's mdmp,bidmp,rpt files (compressed e.g. to my email (which is my nickname @ bistudio.com)with subject CRASH) BattlEye compatibility: SUPPORTED, enjoy ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
imf2000 1 Posted September 7, 2012 Looking good. ---------- Post added at 17:26 ---------- Previous post was at 17:15 ---------- Looking good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[kh]jman 49 Posted September 7, 2012 Thank you arma2server.exe cpu load issue fixed!. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R0adki11 3949 Posted September 10, 2012 this is working great, not had a crash and the LODs are working as they should do. :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MavericK96 0 Posted September 10, 2012 LODs seem better in this release...not totally fixed, but improved, especially on buildings. Trees still seem to have a hard time switching LOD at the appropriate time/distance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
das attorney 858 Posted September 10, 2012 Yes, LOD switching is better, but is it just back to where it was before the recent changes? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OMAC 254 Posted September 11, 2012 I can't see any appreciable difference in LOD switching with last betas. Were related tweaks made for this beta? I hope that BIS will inform us as to when they are making LOD switching tweaks, so we know when (and what) to test... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RSF TheCapulet 59 Posted September 11, 2012 I haven't seen any LOD changes myself either. We deff need more detailed patch notes so we know what to test. I didn't mind so much leading up to 1.62 considering all of the underground changes required for security and DayZ, but it's a trend that really shouldn't continue. "more stability fixes quite some crashfixes included, several other betas regressions" Just isn't enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zorg_DK 10 Posted September 11, 2012 I don't see any LOD changes on buildings, I guess that's good, it looks good. Trees are still a bit slow to swap LODS when you zoom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted September 11, 2012 I haven't seen any LOD changes myself either. We deff need more detailed patch notes so we know what to test. I didn't mind so much leading up to 1.62 considering all of the underground changes required for security and DayZ, but it's a trend that really shouldn't continue. "more stability fixes quite some crashfixes included, several other betas regressions" Just isn't enough. no you don't need to know about anything what's not needed ... especially not about dozens crash fixes and debug traps... double time if that bug was introduced in same beta cycle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RSF TheCapulet 59 Posted September 12, 2012 Well, I agree with that, dwarden. Beta cycle bugs are pointless to detail in most cases. I said that under the clear assumption that LOD stuff has changed again without any changelog info once again. (And I still maintain that stuff like that needs documented) Don't look too much into the tone of my post, I was tired, cranky, and out of green at the time. :P I really do appreciate all the work you guys are doing, I can't stress that enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
