Jump to content

Markle

Member
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

11 Good

About Markle

  • Rank
    Private First Class
  1. Now even VR flat terrains are not safe if target is farther than, for example 600m. I would just suggest raising flight profiles a bit for both direct and overfly attack modes.
  2. PCML missile seems to be dipping too much in direct attack mode, causing them to collide onto terrain. In overfly top attack mode, PCML missile is not correctly deleted after exploding over target.
  3. Well... I'm actually tend to ask for more complex behaviors (or turn on allowCrewInImmobile by default), since now AI crews will and only will immediately give up (and expose themselves to enemy fire) when tracks get damaged, which is pretty strange.
  4. Still looking forward to a change on MAAWS Mk4 Mod 1 scope reticle: https://feedback.bistudio.com/T127862 AI crews will still bail out right after track being damaged, which makes it both too easy and unrealistic to counter AI-controlled armors.
  5. Markle

    Tanks - Damage improvements

    But since Vorona is CSAT-specific... Does that mean NATO and AAF infantries will have to use bunch of MAAWS / PCML to take down static & cold MBTs? May sound acceptable, but not that faction-balanced I think...
  6. Markle

    Tanks - Damage improvements

    Hi I wonder what's the intended places of Titan AT and 9M135 Vorona? Titan system is a bit lighter than Vorona and support both IR homing and SACLOS guidance with both direct and top-down attack mode, where Vorona only support direct SACLOS attack. I guess maybe Vorona is supposed to deal more damage than Titan AT, but didn't observe much difference in current build.
  7. I wonder if that scope has any actual real-world reference — or if BI has consistent design guidelines... That Mod 1 scope is probably differed from all others in game...
  8. Let's wait and see how new weapon balancing works... Right now I care more about MAAWS Mod 1 scope — again, I have to say its reticle is not that ergonomic IMO. Even changing its " ^ " to simple rangefinding " — " will make it better when engaging targets in-between 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 meters. — Or maybe I just need to get more accustomed to SVD... maybe... Are you testing with empty vehicles that haven't been touched by any AI crews? AI gunner will usually switch the operating weapon to machine gun.
  9. If Titan AT kept this all-purpose SACLOS — I'd suggest buffing 9M135 Vorona, or I'm afraid every player would grab Titan AT to top-down bombard everything, from the moving to the still...
  10. After playing with MAAWS Mod 1, I'd say IMO its reticle is quite misleading if you want to hit targets between 400, 600, 800... meters. I would rather prefer Mod 0 reticle with rangefinder. I'm with this ticket: https://feedback.bistudio.com/T127862 Titan AT is able to top-down attack under SACLOS guidance (you can even top-down attack an infantry with mouse-aiming), is that meant to be work in this way?
  11. Markle

    Apex Vehicles Feedback

    Though the linguistic problem of Xi'an's cockpit panel has been mentioned in #3, I'd mention some additional points: T117994: Problems about the Chinese in Xi'an's cockpit panel "鼻" (nose): Should be "机头" (nose of airplane) instead. Except the cockpit panel is made in Japanese or some other places, all characters should use fonts (glyph) in Mainland China standard.
  12. Markle

    Apex Gear Feedback

    T117923: LBV Harness, LBV Grenadier Harness and Raven Vest have thermal signatures
  13. Does anyone know how to disable the notification "bcombat v0.18 started" on the upper right corner? It draws too much attention when mission start.
  14. Markle

    Real Armor Mod

    The most awkward thing Arma 3 represented I think is crews are just fine and tanks are timed to explode after penetrations. Is it possible to simulate APFSDS killing the crews and leaving a relatively complete tank?
×