Alistair

With the new phisyx feature,i wonder if we will be able to crash with our aircraft and land it instead of blowing up on touch. Is it possible?

http://dmn.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/A-29-LAS.jpg (109 kB) PLEASE, make it happen!

+1 for the choose flag option in the profile menu!

Completely agree.

I think we should get a V-22 at least. We need a fast transport unit!

Signed.

I didn't say you couldn't. But why would you do that if you have a smaller and cheaper aircraft, that is very much capable of supplying the needs of the forces?

We are talking about a plane for close distance operations.The C-17 is more expensive and bigger.It's made for long distance operations,transport of heavy armored vehicles to other continents,etc..Thus the Strategic Airlift role. The KC-390,in the other hand,is being made to replace the C-130's.it's supposed to be a medium-sized transport aircraft, for missions within a theatre of operations (also known as Tatical airlift). Now, since NATO is in a bad position with its economy,it wouldn't make sense having unnecessary expenses like this. So the KC-390 (or equal) is the best choice for this game.

KC-390 Nuff said. :D

Exactly. let he balancing to the mission maker,otherwise we will get a rock,paper,scissors game.And that would be awful.

This game will only get better and better. Its looking bad now, i can see it too,but i know BIS will start solving problems and adding more content after the release. And don't forget they will be making a considerable amount of money with ArmA 3 and the upcoming DayZ.Meaning they will be well funded to continue working on Arma and fixing stuff for a long time.:D ;)

These are the planes we should be getting for the other factions: NATO(F35): CSAT(PAK FA/T-50): Makes a lot of sense to me. I hope they release something like this in a post-release patch.

I want my cargo planes! :( I loved the Quad-Rotor drone. It will be amazing to set recon teams in multiplayer. :D

Resistance was just awesome.A true campaign. I hope we get to see something like that in ArmA 3.

So, posted in another thread but this fits better in here: MV-22's would work fine as HALO units. And, theres a new cargo plane in development by brazilian EMBRAER.Its supposed to compete with the Hercules in the international market. And they look great too. :D

MV-22's would work fine as HALO units. And, theres a new cargo plane in development by brazilian EMBRAER.Its supposed to compete with the Hercules in the international market. And they look great too. :D

That can be done easily, in fact someone already did it with AiA. But i think they want to make something authentic.We still don't know how they planned the FM for the fixed wing aircraft to work.So porting stuff could be more complicated than we think.;)

I see Arma as a warfare simulator,that focuses on providing simple mechanics to create a combined arms experience.Aiming on infantry as its principal aspect. Fixed Wing was always an important part of infantry warfare/simulation in Arma, and it does quite well for its limitations.Telling people to play DCS isn't really the right thing to say, some players want to pilot a plane and interact with ground forces without having to spend weeks learning how to turn the plane on. ;) With the new 20km view distance, you will be able to see very well.And i am sure we are still going to see a resolution for the so hated tab locking mechanic. It would be a shame not to have jets in ArmA,and it make a lot sense having them,since we are talking about an Island warfare scenario.

Too far buddy.:p BIS's still the same company.They are having problems and they are talking about it to the community. This kind of behavior won't help. Sure, they are releasing the game with less content than any previous ArmA game in the series, but they are also innovating and creating wonderful and ambitious things.And that doesn't mean they are not going to be added post-release. Let us,fans,show them some true support for their work, they need it now more than ever.;)

I agree. It's amazing how they stated they were going towards a "quality over quantity" program,but didn't follow up for its expectations.We still don't have interiors for apc's and tanks, and now, we won't have a reasonable amount of airplanes.And we will still have to wait several months for the full campaign...

Disappointing.:( And we don't even have a solid confirmation on a post-release content patch for the stuff that got cancelled for release(i mean important stuff like vehicles,weapons,features.Not campaign,that can wait). But hey, we are getting a "set of 10 firing drill challenges".AMAZING!!!one!!!11!1 Jokes aside, it was great from their part to apologize for the inconvenience.And they stated the decisions they made were the best from a long-term perspective.So i guess thats something. Still, this is sad.:(

10 satchels and 100 rabbits. Madness follows. :D

I am telling you, the PAK FA is the perfect choice for OPFOR! @nimrod123 It has its problems,yeah.But its more stable than the F-35's. :D

Awesome stuff. "I'm currently working on the implementation of a soon-to-be-released content package for the Arma 3 Beta. I'm really looking forward to your response and feedback. I think it's going to be an amazing part of the game as it gives you great new possibilities and tactical opportunities." I wonder what it is!

Salve, camarada tupiniquim! Yeah, as said above you can change the wind direction/speed in the mission parameters. Also, take a look at this.