nimrod123
-
Content Count
272 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
-
Medals
-
Everything posted by nimrod123
-
so are you lot running a internal SVN system? if so please tell me you have 2 versions, where one is a untouchable stable backup (i've seen what happens when you lack that)
-
A2 vehicles a solution or A3 lack of content?
nimrod123 replied to mistyronin's topic in ARMA 3 - BETA DISCUSSION
this is till going? i though BIS was taking the position of all assets must be made for this game, so we don't end up with really old models this time around. and considering how much they scraped in the interlude period they had when RL + community response to certain units lead to a focus change, its understandable why their is some much copy paste. personally i think they should have moved the release back to Q1 2014, if not Q2 -
exactly why they should never show unfinished assets, better to lose some sales due to people seeing to little, then to build a platform that you can be attacked from. they should also not listen to the community when it goes ape shit over "to futuristic" assests, as that means all that work is lost. its their game that they funded, and are only now selling
-
A Large Fixed Wing transport aircraft for Arma 3
nimrod123 replied to progamer's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
i doubt its a arma 2 model. unlike the other games they have redone all the models ingame from scratch (part of the reason ARMA 2 launched with more) i doubt this one will be. i would guess its either a holdover from 2010/11 where they where using old assests, or its a new model -
the 45 ACP should have shit all recoil, its got a crazy recoil damping system. i also seem to rember a massive hate rush from alot of arma vetrans about how all the guns kicked more then in arma 2. so clearly they can't please everyone, and i think they should make the game they want, and don't tell the community what they have until its 100% done, so no sneak peeks, no hints, no promises, since the community goes mental when the timeline slips and something has to be cut
-
A2 vehicles a solution or A3 lack of content?
nimrod123 replied to mistyronin's topic in ARMA 3 - BETA DISCUSSION
no but people are saying it completly failed. thats so far from the truth its not even funny. look at HOI3 from PDS, or gettysburg armored warfare, for a massive dayone fail. what arma 3 is, is a project managment fail (and a minor one at that). noone seems to have stood up and said that either they push the date back, or they cut even more content -
its late beta. its is feature complete, not content complete. alpha is where features change, beta is where placeholders exist. personally i want to be able to shoot women *sarc* (lets see how that goes down), and i await the white knighters that say thats sexist or something
-
A2 vehicles a solution or A3 lack of content?
nimrod123 replied to mistyronin's topic in ARMA 3 - BETA DISCUSSION
seriously, don't try and explain these 4 things; QA project managment coding asset creation to the general community, as 90% think they are instant magic, and the dev team was to lazy to read the spell correctly -
A Large Fixed Wing transport aircraft for Arma 3
nimrod123 replied to progamer's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
that name has also been found in the localisations -
main branch is closer to the dev build from ~12 days ago, then last night from the looks of it
-
dev branch and 1.00 are the same during release
-
read the newest change log. basicly all content is in, dev brach probally goes back about 2 weeks on alot of content, then goes far foreward to what current, plus some inhouse stuff. their should also be a main brach patch on day one of all the fixes from between going gold and launch (if they follow standard QA procudure.) then dev brach is the staging ground for beta patches
-
someone has no idea how programing for CPU works, nice to know
-
yes it is, and their is also a option in settings that start you in free look in any vechile
-
your using a BETA build, not a QA'ed build, use at your own risk is on the tin, so no bitching about compatibility is allowed
-
There should be multiple jets in the release version
nimrod123 replied to Marioshata's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
its very comparable to the F22. the pak, less stealthy, has better sensors, slightly slower, longer range, more weapon hard points. and both are better then the F35 in every single way -
[Suggestion] Hotkey for AI Group Quick Select + additonal AI control options
nimrod123 replied to nanobot's topic in ARMA 3 - BETA DISCUSSION
or shift + f1 for red, green is f2 etc -
i run a modifed version of dysliexs. i turned off the lean axis and made the dead zone fairly large and the ratio of real to ingame quite flat
-
already to late for launch, try for a patch
-
[Suggestion] Hotkey for AI Group Quick Select + additonal AI control options
nimrod123 replied to nanobot's topic in ARMA 3 - BETA DISCUSSION
already in. all selected units become a group when you press ctrl + F#, and are selected when you press shift + F#. its normally covered in one of the command tutorials once they are in -
v shync requires you to always be over a limit, otherwise it drops you down to a lower limit. i have found crossfire counters poping when you look around quickly, and that about it, it maybe due to having more Vram
-
why would it be, we are no longer getting the stuff that would make the release build (unless it was held back for reasons, see altis) everything new is more then likely day one patch stuff, since the release build was golded about a week ago
-
There should be multiple jets in the release version
nimrod123 replied to Marioshata's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
that lacked the political backing the F35 has, the F35 is to much of a cash cow for all the people seeing kickbacks to let it go quitely -
There should be multiple jets in the release version
nimrod123 replied to Marioshata's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
and? who cares if it makes money, the contractor has lobbyists, and the pentagon is controlled by the government at the end of the day, this wouldn't be the first program they demand to be kept going for some reason. normally they quote jobs as being very important most of the nations looking at buying it, arn't actually suited to its role. most would be better off buying russian or euro multi roles instead of the f35. this was actually highligted by the austrilians recently, due to the problem that the F35 is realitively short ranged. they suggested buying the licence to make su35's for about a third of the price, so you get good coverage, longer range, and a generally better plane -
There should be multiple jets in the release version
nimrod123 replied to Marioshata's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
it won't be canceled, to many senior politicans pay for their holidays with the bribes... i meant the "lobbying" that goes with the project