HKFlash

Just wait until you decide to place objects on tables or shelves....

Ah yes that's true! But since we didn't even get different turrets and UV for each faction I'm not really surprised...

Are you referring to the lack of furniture? Because I have populated camp maxwell (which is on Stratis, a less demanding terrain) with furniture, vehicles and characters only to see my FPS drop below 30. I think its better for now to make missions with "Men only".

You pretty much nailed it. I hope we will be proven wrong though.

DM stop embarrassing yourself. The point of this thread is content consistency. That's all we want and it's not asking that much because in previous titles it existed! For me, the 2035 scenario strategy clearly failed (although I like the setting).

You just reminded me of this screenshot I took of the Orca helicopter back in the Alpha days: Beware it was with texture set as Very High.

Ouch...that turbofan mistake...

I wasn't expressing any opinion. I did facepalm, like really in front of my computer lol.

You actually made me facepalm... no one managed to do that before...

I guess if they sold us Altis alone we should be happy then. Exploring the island, splendid camera style. :cool:

I vote Ion Cannon. (Almost) No collateral damage.

Hopefully more than that (vehicle turrets and static defenses for example).

And why don't you just shut up? What did you do for this community? Tell me your contributions, your feedback, your FT tickets, your missions, your mods!!! Tell me!!! Anyway, because I don't like infractions I'll resort to the final tool. The ignore list. :cool: Have an happy life.

I did not miss them until they appeared. There was already a car, an attack helicopter and a transport helicopter. Those were just more toys for us to play with. The situation with ARMA3 has no precedent. ---------- Post added at 03:08 ---------- Previous post was at 03:07 ---------- Tell me where I specifically asked them not to be vague. I merely stated it.

No I don't want them...get that in your head.

Again that doesn't tell me if the vehicle A is going to be replaced with vehicle B. It merely says that vehicle B or C might join Faction X's inventory. That's why I'm saying its vague, it doesn't specifically tell you that some assets are placeholders. Because currently thats the problem, turrets being repeated, boats, drones, etc. I mean you just have to check the OP. Now if you tell me that the F-35 (or any other aircraft for that matter) is going to be added in the future to NATO for example, then yes I already knew and I already read that blog post.

Yeah dude whatever...

So which content are they referring to exactly, aside from of course the fixed wing aircraft? My interpretation is that its a vague statement. Period. To each their own. And I understand, no I understand perfectly why they are being vague! They don't want to promise stuff they won't deliver. A wise man once said: underpromise, overdeliver. Let's hope that is the case for this (messy) situation.

The fixed wing aircraft for NATO and CSAT I knew of a long time ago. It was obvious they would come sooner or later. But I'm not so sure about replacement of current reused content. I'll believe it when they specifically announce it. The statement from Joris is just too vague.

Did I ask BIS to listen just to me? NO! So stop mocking me about that optimization stuff. I never asked for it. I never asked them to listen only to me. Source or it did not happen.

Don't point your finger at me, I never asked for optimization though of course I welcome it.

While I don't like to beat a dead horse (because this horse about the artist's assets has been beaten to death) I believe that, after this month's 12th, when the game is finally released and the dust settles, Bohemia Interactive will need to do an urgent rethinking and reflexion about the content development. We are just not used to this: its the first time in the series that so many content has been reused and reskinned. But wait, its not just the vehicles, even the armored crewmen helmets are identical between CSAT and NATO, save for the cammo pattern. Plans change. Priorities change. But the truth is that in the this series previous games that I did play, Operation Flashpoint and ARMA2, this just didn't happen. Remember the AA vehicles? Tunguska and Avenger, completly different. Or the heavy machine guns, the KORD and the M2. Or the armored vehicle sights for that matter! It really added flavour to each faction and made play them unique. I believe that Pettka's team has done a great job when it comes to the configuration of the content. Sure there is room for improvement but his team must know the ASRAAM maximum angle of attack, the 6.5 mm round ballistic curve or the maximum speed of a quadbike. But again they are doing a very good job and its such a shame to see that now that BIS gave priority to content configuration, the content artistical assets suffered such a major blow.

I say, bring on the Altian technicians!

While I understand your point the way he wrote his post just makes me go away and not read it at all.

You didn't offend me. Yet I find your argumentation lacking to say the least. Talking about courts in a videogame forum... Well I know for sure I won't loose my sleep for failing at using a non-native language expression.