gL33k

impressive works, devs and community !

exact. did someone try to customize the SSAO hexacode profile for nvidia drivers ? i suspect nvidia integrated several profile for several game engine. maybe one of them works for arma2 ...

point light source and volumetric ambiant occlusion (or at least an approaching method). arma2 is great on topography, texturing, even geometry. even if , with DX11 gpu , they could think about tesselation ;) the only thing the engine lack at my POV , is better shadowing . actually, their SSAO post processing apply to grass clutter only . not building or unit . ---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:29 PM ---------- yeah he is dreaming actually ... however, i tested a GI hacking shader with OBGE v3 mod for oblivion. it gave the look of 90's CGI demo ! was funny . in 10 years , the power of gpu will give ability to oversample that by 1024 by the law of moore , and then remove the grainy effect. i presume ...

volumetric ambient occlusion... 'nuff said

hi dudes ! any news about a working enbserie SSAO for arma2/CO ? i have an old one , 0.75 for GTA SA , but SSAO is not correct. it darkened all the screen. i tried several bugfix value without success... ps: is nvidia SSAO working with this game ? is it fast enough ? (screen please :D ) if so, i think i will change my GPU for a nv.

a lot of dead unit were still on their foot, inanimate. they disappear like corps after a while. critical bug repro is not so easy. because i was playing warfar benny 2.0.70

i'm absolutly SURE that my 1.59 behave better considering AI displacement. what you said is odd. because the way the trooper move , feel different. first this back warping didn't happen before. and second point , i see clearly soldiers running, but moving slower than their motion let you think . the soldiers "slow down" while the running motion is still in progress, they "slide" on the ground. and that make me think interpolation has something to do with it. in a nutshell, the average position error of units is worst than 1.59 considering suma answer : this is strange, because this regression is easily seen. i hope it's not a patent problem

yes , of course

i seriously don't like the new interpolation stuff. soldiers warp back every seconds even with 40+ fps server and low bandwith (on LAN). it maybe has something to do with my personal basic.cfg settings, wich are :

less but not far from 30% ... 30% probably due to bigger L3 cache

congrat's for this sound addon . it's gorgeous. but the M107 has several shot sound. is it intended ?

going from i5 2400 (@stock frequency , unable to OC these one) to a fresh 2500k unlocked , set @4600mhz , IS a real upgrade. with a such GPU , he 's pretty sure to have a nice boost. go for it guy !

physx + vertex deformation (on vehicle , metal door etc ) should be thinked .

hi. crcti revival ! this battlefield engine is great , i didn't play it on arma2. it's working far better than actual warfar 2.0.69. but there are problems with this mission. the most important IMO , is the city selection when you choose a small number of them. it's sparsed on the map. the AI need to walk or drive so much to reach objective. in warfar, the city selection is coherent.

and 1 years and half later, amd still have not any CPU able to equal intel core i7 on this ground...

stop misleading him. AMD has no equivalent of intel i7 :D

keep 6Go (4GB arma exe, 1GB video texture cache, 1GB system cache ?) for RAM , use 6 for arma add see if it's better ?

really ? the ramdisk software was maybe not so good ? did you try another one ?

yup that's it

here my results with i7 2600k@4500mhz/8Go/5870/win7 64 @proper plant low visual @stock game http://img11.hostingpics.net/pics/260418arma2oasettings.png >100kb http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=260418arma2oasettings.png ps: the grass is still a BIG problem in this game. proper plant low visual is a must have . without it, my fps with an 5870 (wich is not a low end mono-gpu graphics card) fall to 18 fps when i aim with a riffle optic. wich is NUTS! the mod slightly decrease the density of grass, and with the same grpahics feeling, give 22 fps more ....

i upgraded my hardware from Q6600@3.2ghz / 4Go / 5870 / win7 64 to : i7 2600k@4.5ghz (Hyperthreading off) / 8Go / 5870 / win7 64. - i more that DOUBLE my performance in arma2 CO. i can play at object very high , fly over big city with VD > 4500m and having more than 35 fps . - CPU benchmark of arma2 (benchmark 2) give me 21 fps with vd 4000. my Q6600 did 9 fps with vd 2000m... it IS the ultimate arma hardwware upgrade. the other is to set an ramdisk with 32Go and put arma2 files on it. i iwll maybe do that , later ... ps: hdd stuttering seem to be gone . i suspect arma2 to use the ram space more efficiently , especially since i have now 8Go . but cpu horsepower has definitly its role too ps2: ;) here my results on armamark 1.0 mission @proper plant low visual @stock game http://img11.hostingpics.net/pics/260418arma2oasettings.png > 100kb http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=260418arma2oasettings.png

i second that ! always check hardware review website before purchase ! my god, you just bought an inferior graphics card ...

giving the number of AI unit, i presume it's mainly MP. you need a dedicated server

Is warfx addons is known to cause problem in single player mission ? i ask that because i saw several time a kind of "lag" when i shot enemy soldier. i'm not sure, but i remember a problem with unkillable unit with this addons.