Pan Samogon

Just looked at Navigation plotter seat in Tu-95MS.So everybody AC/DC :P No seriosly,thats funny to read.

Well,since last implementations.... you able to play even late USSR using ARF.USAF stuck at the begining of 2007 and up to today or so. So literally early Serbia had tons of Yugoslav stuff,which scrapped for now.Such as M53,M56,Praga M53/59... even Thompons and StG44s(Used mostly by Yugo paratroopers up to end of 80 as far as I know).Don't want to ask for something,but answer to 'time' question mostly solve another question - "What shall we expect in the future releases?" Im just too much curious. :P Thanks.

I've missed all the party.... Since SAF now are part of RHS,I got a question about it.What time period you planning to reconstruct?Only modern statement? btw... still no special engineering RPG rocket... RHS,WHEN?! :P it's a joke ofcource,good job guys.

Seems like deactivated gun.I see ribbing on the buttstock.Probably it's only matter production period.Some has it(as in this case - late AKS-74),some don't.But documentation had buttstock without ribbing.

@bek Seems this guy right. AKS-74 tech doc. http://gunsua.net/nsd/avtomat/545/katalog_detaley_i_sborochnyh_edinits_aks74/aks74_katalog_detaley_i_sborochnyh_edinits.html and AKS-74U to compare. http://www.ak-info.ru/joomla/index.php/aaka/7-ak74/40-aks74ucatalogzip For game it's not nessesary,since nobody will even see this,but... just to let you know.

Such answers spanws much more question. Looks like you working on aircraft weapons,so here is a question... any more goodies for next release,or maybe for the future?Like S-24,S25,Various caliber bombs?

This prooves you didn't read my post properly.And... your military knowledge outdated. 1)The ingame 6.5 round I compare to IRL 6.5 Grendel.They have various bullets,starts from 90grans and up to 130grans.Light bullet better for automatic weapon,while heavier - for marksmanship.And actually,it's close to average 7.62x51 by characteristics,but recoil still acceptable.So,the real reason,why this wasn't adopted IRL is because will be costly to adopt it around a whole NATO block. 2)As well as 6.5 Grendel Round,China also uses heavier bullets for GPMGs and Sniper Rifles.And why the hell think it's all because of supply problems?They had 7.62x54R machineguns.And this ammo isn't sort of difficult to produce or difficult to find. 3)LWMMG was been created because soldiers in A-stan reques man-portable weapon for long range combat.But since USA still uses crappy M2(AKA 68 kilo,and each 100rnd belt is 13.),they didn't have something for this purpose.Thats how this MG been created.As example - Russian military never even think about such kind of weapon,just because they're already have 25 kilo HMG,which able to fire from bipod,and 18kilo automatic grenade launcher.

Even 10 years are not too much for military terms of the huge nation.2 years it's like yesterday.The really last conflict of the USA was the A-Stan,where they're been used.So,what the problem of making mission in 2007-2010,for example? As for realism - you're free will to put this in mission or not.RHS also have prototype failed BMP-2 prototype,which isn't that realistic.You may just don't use it.

Fate of Japanice(Aka KV-107) and Swedish(Aka HKP 4a/b/c/d) CH-46 is unknown.After USMC it's actually was the main operators of them. And... to my honest opinion it's still fit RHS setting.Kinda they're used in A-stan,so it's was not too much time ago.

They're both are prototypes/non-serial... whats the diffirence?

Well,rate popularity by download rate doesn't mean it's let's say... popular. As example of me,cuz I've curious,i've download it.So I increace download count by them. Enabled it,watch from every side flied etc etc. What then... I wanna play MP with it.But there is nothing I can find. As for weight,yes it's smaller thats true.But my ArmA3 folder are filled with 100GB of mods.80% never been used in MP.And hey,did you still use dial-up connection?I've send and receive today my 12 years old month limit for a single day,sometimes even more. There is many pros and cons of every type of mod,but still - player gets more when it's part of something big.Thats why we have questions like: cheers.

Actually lack of English knowledge forced me to edit post,writed slightly wrong thing... but seems too late. OK then - Author able to do his own mod anything,release,not release,delete etc etc... it's his own choise. The cons of Stand-Alone addons - they're unpopular.It's ok for event modsets,but absolutely ruin any public usage of them.As well it almost alwaysmay cause compilation problems with other mods.In case of vehicles - their immortality or extremely weakness.In case of weapon - the main problem is the same weapon uses diffirent mags. Huge conversion mods lacks of this problems. As I said - the last word for author,but players gets more,when it's part of something bigger.

Short answer is no.At least since I've asked last time.

Yeap,absoultely amaizing. btw,if you planned to make custom village building,PM me,Ill give you some reference photos. It's Russian,but trust me,since USSR fall nothing really changed a lot in country side.

seems to be nothing changes since 2007 in case of tris count.

There is really no issues on this HP?Probably I am the only one gun maniac here :P This thread created specially for searching for issues by community,so don't be shy,post all incorrect things you found.Cuz if I go further I probably can't fix these issues as I can do so now. Actually I have a question.What's average polycount for a weapon in ArmA3. Since I've start creating LP,now I have around 7k tris on the lower receiver(Without grip,buttstock and mag,just receiver),I'ts still a lot.But as well,I wish keep quality standart for 2017.

Yeap,I did.But you must edit PBO,cuz NIArms and RHS have diffirent sound variables.So you can't make patch PBO,you should edit the main NIArms PBO itself.Which is... kinda above EULA. The only think I can suggest - make your own config and use it for your own.

Well,IRL 6.5 prooves itself as mulifunctional cartrige,which can into both sniper purposes and general purposes. But since reasons it's not adopted. btw,you may look at China today.They're using unified 5.8 cartridges for everything.Marksman Rifles,Assault Rifles,LMGs and GPMGs. 338 Norma it's like portable lightweight 50 cal,but without anti-material potential.

oops... well... I should admit my English sux.

But dude,you have been locked by radar(And missle already launched to you actually) and already have chassis,hydraulics and rotor catch failures.Why did you make broken helo? I've just read info table on right side.In this status it's usually means serious problems to you,if you real pilot.

AKS-74U goddamnit! Please learn this damn formula: AK(M)(S)(N) AK(S)-74(U)(N) AK-74M where: AK - Kalashnikov Automatic Rifle M - Modernised S - Folded Stock U - Shotened N - Night Sight rail.

Much better camo.

Actually I don't know.Probably it's different,but I've not sure,need to Research.But the only thing I can say fully sure - 29S should have brake I referenced. As for MiG29K,it's not too much different technically,but looks diffirent.It's just bigger and have one flap instead of 2(Cuz above they have hook for landing) aerodynamic cover at rear(Which probably attached to the same 'Rod').

Fast response should be respectful,thank you.But actually it's still not right. There is too high contrast between green and gray.IRL it's far much smoother. And it's too clean.If UV map & your photoshop skills allows - try to add some usage trails,soot or so... it's all can be overlayed over all skins btw. Also - I found 3d model issue... Look at tail,between engines.It's like Su-27.In fact - there is located airbrake. Probably it's too late to fix that,but I still note this.

Depends by who?Sorts of militia still may use that.Don't want touch the Ukraine,but they been spotted there. As well as Russia in 1st Chechen War scenarios.