stumpysequoia
-
Content Count
54 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Everything posted by stumpysequoia
-
[WIP]A-10 Warthog Series Standalone
stumpysequoia replied to firewill's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
I asked for projected release date which would typically entail a time frame as broad as a quarter of a year. It is also a time frame that is expected to change hence the "projected" part... -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
I'm just waiting for a new plane :D Although the destroyer would be cool, a different plane on the deck would be nice. Even better if we get it as a Christmas present! (Yes I'm aware planned release of the F/A-18C & F-35C are in January).- 744 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- United States
- Navy
- (and 4 more)
-
Preview release: Nimitz for Arma3 (0.103)
stumpysequoia replied to TeTeT's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Flight deck Crew mod is WAY better than Futarm. Futarm uses 2035 crew gear and gives the units guns on default spawn... flight deck crew mod has quite realistic uniforms. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
I get that but it becomes increasingly annoying when you have a packed deck with upwards of 30 aircraft. I've been landing and launching off the Carrier for 10 months now with my unit. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
In NAV mode on all aircraft with a HUD, will there be something in place so that there isn't the HUD clutter you get on John's F/A-18? (Very frequent problem among new pilots in my unit {AKA their primary excuse to how they didn't land on the carrier...})- 744 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- United States
- Navy
- (and 4 more)
-
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Just for the Launch bar to be deployed before an option to "Connect to Catapult #" comes up. Maybe something to work with TeTeT on for the blocking the catapult connect script if the launch bar isn't lowered.- 744 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- United States
- Navy
- (and 4 more)
-
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
No. Launch bar on the nose of the aircraft. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
It may be a small detail but will the launch bars on the fixed wing aircraft have an animation? -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Prob about 10~ pages back. I was informed that Instructor seat will be the renamed Pilot so that Instructor has full control. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
In the T-6 mod, the Front seat (Trainee) can lock it, not the Instructor. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
The purpose is so that the Instructor can lock controls from the Trainee. AKA if you think your Trainee shouldn't be a pilot, or if the trainee is being a goof, you can prevent them from flying anymore. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
It was said previously that for the T-45 the back sit will be set as Pilot, but the name for the variable will be "instructor" rather than "Pilot." -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Won't that kind of defeat the purpose of having hard mode for realism units if their newer / less trusted members are able to change the plane usage difficulty at any point in time?- 744 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- United States
- Navy
- (and 4 more)
-
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Will there be an option in the module to lock the vehicle to a certain difficulty? -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Well then... I did not expect that kind of a Monday update. Very pleasing to see that using modules you will allow it to appeal to people who play with mods for fun, all the way to realism unit level. Very nice. Now as an aid to those who don't usually use modules, will you be setting aircraft default (No linked modules) to Easy mode? (Figured someone would want to know.) -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Well, we are a CSG so carrier landings are our thing. So if you want a couple of us to give our opinion about how it flies and lands, give me a shout. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
:*( lol nice how smooth are the carrier landings? -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Can't wait for CSG to test it! -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
...Oh great more for me to get antic about. Haha. The skins look good but the class names are still screwed up by the way. ;D -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
MH-60R is the more modernized variant of this aircraft. Fills the same role. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
It's called NAVAL warfare pack for a reason. They would have no purpose for more than half of the fixed wing aircraft if there was no tail hooks. __________________ Still dying to see another one of these planes on my deck for my unit. Now I've got ants in my pants for them. :D- 744 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- United States
- Navy
- (and 4 more)
-
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
What unit....? -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
No, like the bubble on the tail plane is too big --- Compare this photo to the model photo https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Usnavy.ea6b.prowler.750pix.jpg And compare this photo of the F-35B to the model http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/p4woexiequmsucx1erz9.jpg ---------------- So not enlarge, rather shrink.- 744 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- United States
- Navy
- (and 4 more)
-
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Overall, lovely. However one issue, the EA-6B, the tail is to fat. Like the bubble on top of the tail plane. If you look at some photos you'll know that it is no where near that fat. Also the tail planes of the F-35B are WAY to big in proportion to the body. If that was a C or an A that would be understandable, but that is way to big for a B. -
US Naval Warfare Pack [WIP]
stumpysequoia replied to Foxone's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Haha, don't forget about that extra little 25 people CSG11 adds. :D- 744 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- United States
- Navy
- (and 4 more)