wind 0 Posted January 23, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1448x1088 32bit <span id='postcolor'> Close to my desktop, I run it at 1440x1080 By the way, I play OFP at 1600x1200x32, smooth as silk with my GF3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Agua 0 Posted January 23, 2002 1280x1024x32 - I have a 21" monitor and lower resolutions look like crap on my screen as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shadow 6 Posted January 23, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 23 2002,15:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I've got an IBM T20 Thinkpad. I'm waiting for IBM to come out with more powerful ones than what's available today that will have top of the line video chips built in. Then I'll find some justification at work to have it acquisitioned for lil' ol' me! Â <span id='postcolor'><span id='postcolor'> Well the new T23 is available, Avon. P-III 1.2 GHz,128MB,48GB,14.1" @1400x1050, AGP4x w/16MBVram, DVD-rom,internal 10/100 & 56K & Bluetooth. Preload: WinXP I hope you're rich I can get you one. costs measely 3500usd Want one? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gaswell 1 Posted January 23, 2002 Well, what do you know... I'm typing on a T23 right now. Seems like a nice piece of machinery so far. Except for its cramped undersized keyboard... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shabadu 0 Posted January 23, 2002 WTF! What kind of beasts are you guys playing on? I got 1GHz 256Mb (unfortunately onboard grafics) and my game seriously suffers if there is more than a small scuffle in the street, and that's at 800x600x16(or it may be 32bit I forgot). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shadow 6 Posted January 23, 2002 The T-series ain't that cramped. The X-series however ... The T- and AxP-models got the same keyboard and I find it quite easy to use. Ofcourse nothing beats a standard 104-board. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gaswell 1 Posted January 23, 2002 Shabadu, you gotta get a decent graphics card, preferably a Geforce2 or 3. There's just no way around it. With 1GHz, Geforce2 and 256MB RAM I have a silky smooth ride in 1024x768x32, even with a lot going on. Battlefields? No problemo. Shadow, I must admit that the T23 keyboard is actually quite comfortable. Good wrist support. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted January 23, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Shadow @ Jan. 23 2002,17:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well the new T23 is available, Avon. P-III 1.2 GHz,128MB,48GB,14.1" @1400x1050, AGP4x w/16MBVram, DVD-rom,internal 10/100 & 56K & Bluetooth. Preload: WinXP I hope you're rich I can get you one. costs measely 3500usd Want one? <span id='postcolor'> Nope. I want a Thinkpad with a 2GHz CPU, a 64-128MB top of the line graphics chip (I believe Toshiba is or will start incorporating such a new mobile chip from Nvidia), 512MB of RAM and a 15.1" screen. Furthermore, I don't want to touch Windows XP until the rest of the world has reported all the bugs and MS has put out SP4/5/6 or whatever. Like I said - next year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted January 23, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Shabadu @ Jan. 23 2002,17:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What kind of beasts are you guys playing on? I got 1GHz 256Mb (unfortunately onboard grafics) and my game seriously suffers if there is more than a small scuffle in the street, and that's at 800x600x16(or it may be 32bit I forgot).<span id='postcolor'> Mine's not a beast at all. It's an IBM Thinkpad, 700Mhz, 256MB RAM, with a very humble S3 Savage Mark IX 8MB (count 'em, Jim!) graphics chip, playing at 1024x768x32 Direct3D (HW T&L not supported) with most of my OFP advanced settings maxxed. How's playing? Nice. I can notice just a touch of slow framerate when I play an SP mission like Battlefields, which is still quite playable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigUzi=WoP= 1 Posted January 23, 2002 At 1600 x 900 x 16 OFP rocks also turn ur brightness up to 1.8 and the gamma down to 1.2 or 1.3. the washed out colours come alive and the realism is increased. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigUzi=WoP= 1 Posted January 23, 2002 This res plays on a 1.3 gig pentium 4, 256mb RDRAM on an overclocked Hercules MX2 32mb graphics card running at core and ram clock speed of 200. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmy 0 Posted January 23, 2002 i have 1 gig p3 128mb of ram(soon to be 512) shitty 16 mb nvidia video card(soon to be my friends 64mb g2) 19" monitor at 1024*768*32 im upgrading my ram and video card, but is it the ram that really matters or the processor speed cause avon said that she only has a 700mhz with 256 RAM and it runs fine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WKK Gimbal 0 Posted January 24, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (timmy @ Jan. 23 2002,23:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">i have 1 gig p3 128mb of ram(soon to be 512) shitty 16 mb nvidia video card(soon to be my friends 64mb g2) 19" monitor at 1024*768*32 im upgrading my ram and video card, but is it the ram that really matters or the processor speed cause avon said that she only has a 700mhz with 256 RAM and it runs fine.<span id='postcolor'> just remember if you get more ram than 256, OFP will not use it. I think that is a shame. I can only imagine what battles could be fought if OFP supported unlimited amounts of ram. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4WDTaco 0 Posted January 24, 2002 1024x768@32bit 350Mhz PII <- Yup, don't even make the recommended specs! 348Mb RAM 64Mb RADEON VIVO @ 216/216mhz DirectX 8.1 You might think that I wouldn't be able to play but I sometimes go up to 1280x1024@32bit when I really wanna feel action and all explosions, lights, textures look awsome. I'm planning on building my own system in February but my system is still running the newest games even w/all the details pumped up. I know I'll freak out with the difference w/the newer system but I'm just loyal to my first 'puter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FetishFool 0 Posted January 24, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 23 2002,01:39)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Mine's not a beast at all. It's an IBM Thinkpad, 700Mhz, 256MB RAM, with a very humble S3 Savage Mark IX 8MB (count 'em, Jim!) graphics chip, playing at 1024x768x32 Direct3D (HW T&L not supported) with most of my OFP advanced settings maxxed. How's playing? Nice. I can notice just a touch of slow framerate when I play an SP mission like Battlefields, which is still quite playable.<span id='postcolor'> Are you dead serious? My kitten's specs are: PIII 750mhz 384 SDRAM GeForce2 MX-400 32mb (128bit) I play on 800x600x32, with geo at 1200, but with max lights at 32. This is with HW TL. In-game, I have my settings at zero shadows, maxed frames, 9 visual quality. And I get serious frame lockups. Grrr... Avon, you must be God. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R. Gerschwarzenge 0 Posted January 24, 2002 I have: Athlon Classic 750Mhz 384 sdram GeForce 2 GTS 32mb and with a resolution of 1152x864x32 HW T&L enabled I get an average of 21 fps when I play. My processor is the bottleneck on my computer. The Battlefields mission is very slow on the beginning but playable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Talis 0 Posted January 24, 2002 I'm playing it at 800x600x16 cause I have a shity videocard ( a 3dfx Banshee) Need to change it now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloney 0 Posted January 26, 2002 Pentium 4 1.3 Ghz 512 RDRAM Geforce 3 Ti500 1280x960x32 I guess I could run at 1600x1200 but its very choppy, its probably my monitor's crappy refresh rate... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Z 0 Posted January 27, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">WTF! What kind of beasts are you guys playing on? I got 1GHz 256Mb (unfortunately onboard grafics) and my game seriously suffers if there is more than a small scuffle in the street, and that's at 800x600x16(or it may be 32bit I forgot).<span id='postcolor'> Let me see, I got a P4 1.8Ghz, 512MB Ram, SoundBlaster Audigy with 5:1 speakers, 40Gig HD an Old Geforce Pro 256 32MB DDRam 17in Monitor, I play the game at 800*600*32 85Hz HW T&L on as my windows Desktop is 1024*768*32 85Hz refresh rate, any higher and the refresh rate on my monitor is too low. I use to have a P2 350Mhz 384MB Ram, Same Graphics Card, and I could play the game with no problem (1024*768*32) with detail on half and HW T&L on and a SoundBlaster Live! Value Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
