The Middle East part 2

[bucket man 2]

Awww, that's nice. Too bad you didn't tell us the real reason you oppose killing terrorists. Demonstrating how grown up I am... It's called humor. Anyway, here's another one - Ahmed Yassin: Yassinerated. He was also called the pediatrician of death. Now how is that not ironic?

It seems you have absolutely no clue about why people find celebrating death as rather tasteless and sick?

Most israelis I have met online seem to have the same arrogant attidude and so does their government and it is excactly the reason why many dislike Israel or its citizens.

Because I have only met few, I cant say that whole Israel is full of people like that.

I would bet my life that if somebody was making fun of dead IDF soldiers you would be one of the first screaming for the mods to ban that anti-semite.

[martinovic 0]

Quote[/b] ]I would like a mod to interfere right now because you are really dumbing down the intelectual level of this particular thread.

Hah! He's been doing that for quite some time now. Phoenix, avon and nemesis, the dynamic trio of bullshit and annoyance.

[mp_phonix 0]

Quote[/b] ]I would like a mod to interfere right now because you are really dumbing down the intelectual level of this particular thread.

Hah! He's been doing that for quite some time now. Phoenix, avon and nemesis, the dynamic trio of bullshit and annoyance.

Well, were some of you not dumb enought to notice that "Phoenix, avon and nemesis" are the only one supporting Israel ?

"the dynamic trio of bullshit and annoyance" ? I'd say you and some other members are the "the dynamic trio of arrogance". good enought for you ?

and it's phonix no phoenix. I guess you are not that smarter either

[EiZei 0]

Axis of flaming?

[oneoff 0]

Quote[/b] ]Phoenix, avon and nemesis, the dynamic trio of bullshit and annoyance

sounds like a roll call for a fox news special, reporting live from a "neighberhood" in palesraeltine were scenes of stone throwing youths are being shot with "avon" rounds by there "nemesis" "Mrphonix" no relation to the stereophonics apparently or the bird that rose from the ashes .

[Balschoiw 0]

Quote[/b] ]Too bad you didn't tell us the real reason you oppose killing terrorists.

Twisting facts again ? It´s getting tiring to write answers on accusations that you can´t support with any quote.

Quote[/b] ]It's called humor.

No, it´s called abusing the forum for your hatred driven-teeny campaign against all the "enemies" of Israel. I´m fed of it.

Take your cheap propaganda elsewhere.

I reported both your "jokes" as they are tasteless, have no meaning else than to bring unrest here, and it is disgusting for me to read what you have to say about assasinations, murder of civillians and disrespect for races you show here constantly.

I am fed of it.

[mp_phonix 0]

Nemisis, looks like we are going to be banned ?

Quote[/b] ]

disrespect for races

And when exactly did I show disrespect for race ? I told a million times I have no probelms with arabs or muslims.

[SPQR 0]

Neither Custler with the Indians : "A good fellow is a dead fellow"

[sanctuary 19]

Neither Custler with the Indians : "A good fellow is a dead fellow"

Not Custer, but this sentence was supposedly pronounced by Sheridan.

[martinovic 0]

Quote[/b] ]Well, were some of you not dumb enought to notice that "Phoenix, avon and nemesis" are the only one supporting Israel ?

Well, there must be a less arrogant way of supporting Israel.

Sorry for flaming you three but some stuff you and nemsie said earlier were proven wrong (like the that picture nemesis posted, parading it as evidence of hezbollah presence near un outposts, which turned out to be a picture from a several year old report). Avon just copypastes stuff and thinks the "evidence will speak for itself", like that time she posted that list of "jihads" which was eviscerated by everyone who knew something about a specific "jihad" listed on it.

[billybob2002 0]

Neither Custler with the Indians : "A good fellow is a dead fellow"

Not Custer, but this sentence was supposedly pronounced by Sheridan.

*off-topic*

Sheridan allegedly told Tosawi, a Comanche Chief who considered himself a "good Indian," that "the only good Indians I ever saw were dead" and not "a good fellow is a dead fellow."

*off-topic*

[Nemesis6 0]

I show discrimination of races? That's news to me.

Hold on, I think I just figured out why I've just been painted as a racist -

I joke about the death of a horrible person. Said person is an Arab, therefore I am a racist for not giving him respect. Double, meet standard. Now, Double and Standard, meet veiled racism. Who is he, you ask? He's when you use a person's ethnicity/religion as a way of making them immune to critique.

Summary - He was a terrible person and in a way, I'm glad he's dead. And apparently, that makes me a racist. Man, being a racist feels... To be honest, I don't mind.

[Fumega 0]

And another 65 palestinians are dead... I'm tired of this shit.

[Nemesis6 0]

423 mobs exported to Uzbekistan...

What are we doing?

[Stendac 0]

BUZZARD @ Oct. 31 2006,15:12)]Actually, Xavery, I'd have to disagree with you on this one. You know, the UN is more than just the USA. And the fact that the US and UK have disregarded the UN when they invaded Iraq only demonstrated the UN's weakness regarding final decisions with real consequences. So having the whole of the UN countries support a motion, even if vetoed, and going in against Israel, against the US's wishes, could also be seen as a move of defiance against an increasingly intolerable US. I bet that many countries would jump on that horse. The only thing really stopping them would be, as you said, the anti-war sentiment. But think of the situation. None of these countries who committed their own people to this UN mission (which, as we do recall, is only there because Israel said the UN should handle the issue) will tolerate them being shot at - and I bet the anti-war sentiment would change real quick when the corpses start coming home from IDF-caused "incidents"... I mean, first the UN is invited to take care of the issue, and the next second it's in the IDF crosshair? No, really, if push comes to shove, I bet most countries would side on the anti-Israel faction, against the US will or not.

I guess this could get alot more interesting than we thought...  

I dunno.

The United States can invade Iraq when the UN says "no" because it's... well, the United States. I'm not sure it would work the other way around. I don't think the UN has that degree of cohesion. If the US doesn't want it to happen, some of the other countries would hesitate to support a motion against Israel or they'd at least stay neutral.

As for not tolerating their soldiers being shot at, they might. They did in Rwanda anyway.

[Baff2 0]

UN peacekeepers in Lebanon have been getting shot by the IDF for decades. It never changed anything before.

[-ZG-BUZZARD 0]

This time it's different. This time it's not only peacekeepers, but real armed forces that are there to enforce peace - with real fight-back capability. This time they're not just there to watch things happen and just report things in.

[Nemesis6 0]

BUZZARD @ Nov. 05 2006,13:44)]This time they're not just there to watch things happen and just report things in.

That's wrong as witnessed by their inaction. It's just like in Sudan.

[Stendac 0]

BUZZARD @ Nov. 05 2006,13:44)]This time it's different. This time it's not only peacekeepers, but real armed forces that are there to enforce peace - with real fight-back capability. This time they're not just there to watch things happen and just report things in.

You're upbeat optimism is endearing.

[SPQR 0]

While Tsahal's "Oops! I did it again" Beit Hanoun incident, killed a whole family of terrorists, Israeli Air Force keeps acting like a fool, risking from being fired upon by Mistral AA missiles :

Babelfish translation

Quote[/b] ]French-Israeli incident in southern Lebanon: live reaction of Paris.

The threatening attitude of Israeli fighters which were near from causing a self-defence missile firing from the French blue Helmets of Finul at the end of October in southern Lebanon, caused a sharp reaction of France which convened Thursday the ambassador from Israel in Paris.

This procedure, little attends with regard to an Israeli diplomat, slices with the Net reheating of the relations between France and Israel observed since a visit of the former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in Paris, at the summer 2005.

On a solemn tone, the minister of Defense Michele Alliot-Marie revealed Wednesday evening with the platform of the French National Assembly that the French blue Helmets had been "at two seconds" to open fire on Israeli hunters which simulated dive bombings above their position.

The incident occurred on October 31 with Deir Kifa, bases French Force of fast reaction, a component of the temporary Force of the United Nations in Lebanon (Finul), according to the ministry.

"A two seconds close, there was a shooting against the planes which threatened our forces thus directly", Mrs. Alliot-Marie was moved in front of the national representation: "a catastrophe was just avoided".

In Paris, irritation is all the more sharp as the overflights of the Lebanese territory by Israeli aviation continue in spite of the many calls of France and the international community.

Twelve hunters Israeli bombers still flew over Thursday morning the headquarters of Finul de Naqoura, in southern Lebanon, then even as the Israeli ambassador in Paris Daniel Shek intended himself to point out the position of France.

According to the spokesman of the Quay of Orsay Jean-Baptist Mattéi, the chief of the French diplomacy Philippe Douste-Blazy "made him share of our serious concern vis-a-vis to the continuation of the Israeli overflights of the Lebanese territory", inviting the Israeli authorities once again to make "cease such acts".

Mr. Shek has on his side declared with AFP that the overflight was not "not aggressive" and "was badly interpreted by the French force". Affirming that all the Israeli overflights are "reconnaissance flights", he said that it was not "not possible of (them) stopping for the moment".

As for Mrs. Alliot-Marie, it again warned Thursday morning against all "provocation on both sides" at southern Lebanon. On its side, the Israeli army ensured not to be informed "not of the incident" of October 31, supporting that its Air Force "never carries out offensive overflights above the south of Lebanon".

But the spokesman of the French ministry of Defense Jean-François Bureau was formal: "in our eyes, the materiality of the facts is not contestable", has it says, speaking about "absolute certainty".

Several incidents had already occurred these last months between Israeli aviation and the French and German navies. A German ship of recognition had been flown over by six Israeli fighters whereas it crossed with broad of Israel. The French frigate Courbet knew a similar mishap. Israeli fighters had flown over it "without answering the radio, which had worried us", indicated Mr. Bureau.

France is the first contributor of Finul with 1.650 blue Helmets out of the 9.500 soldiers deployed in his centre. Paris will give the command of this international force on February 1 in Italy, second contributor with 1.400 soldiers.

The IR seekers covers of the missiles were removed, missiles ready to fire.

Maybe the poor pilots were unpleased of being scanned by the radar Samantha and got scared ?

Or had they difficulties to identify the big FINUL camp they thought to be just a bunch of unknown tents ?

I guess the day one of their fighter would get a missile in the a.., Hezbollah will get very friendly with us

[GoOB 0]

While Tsahal's "Oops! I did it again" Beit Hanoun incident, killed a whole family of terrorists

Eeh... The eight kids who got killed were hardly terrorists, wouldn't you agree? I doubt any of the other casualties were either, a pretty rotten comment IMO.

[SPQR 0]

While Tsahal's "Oops! I did it again" Beit Hanoun incident, killed a whole family of terrorists

Eeh... The eight kids who got killed were hardly terrorists, wouldn't you agree? I doubt any of the other casualties were either, a pretty rotten comment IMO.

Pure but non-lethal cynicism, unlike usual israeli point of view to collateral damage.

[Sennacherib 0]

sorry to stop the general flamewar. i just ask a question and i leave:

Quote[/b] ]423 mobs exported to Uzbekistan...

what are mobs?

btw, thx for this amusing topic. a nice kindergarten (this is a generality, this isn't for someone in particular)

[GoOB 0]

While Tsahal's "Oops! I did it again" Beit Hanoun incident, killed a whole family of terrorists

Eeh... The eight kids who got killed were hardly terrorists, wouldn't you agree? I doubt any of the other casualties were either, a pretty rotten comment IMO.

Pure but non-lethal cynicism, unlike usual israeli point of view to collateral damage.

Ah - I can read the sarcasm into the sentence now, my bad

[Baff2 0]

BUZZARD @ Nov. 05 2006,13:44)]This time it's different. This time it's not only peacekeepers, but real armed forces that are there to enforce peace - with real fight-back capability. This time they're not just there to watch things happen and just report things in.

Isreal has broken the ceasefire something like 200 times already.

I wouldn't count on seeing that fight back anytime soon. They are peacekeepers, not peacemakers.