2s6m "tunguska" final release

[Rastavovich 0]

Since the beta test we did a major overhaul on the Tunguska and here is now the product of your feedback and our work.

Head over to our page and grab it there. It works for V1.40+.

(some) Changes are:

- Armor/weapons tweaked

- AI wont attack MBTs anymore, but any other target

- Textures improved

- sounds changed/added

- Model improved

- interior model changed

Mirror should be up on OFP-Zone soon.

PS: The "DKMM_Tunguska.txt" is an info file used by OFP Addon Manager, simply copy it with the pbo in your addon folder.

PPS: OPFAM 0.95b will not display it 100% correct, but that will be fixed in the next version.

[Gunship -OFP-ZONE- 0]

Yep download added @ http://www.ofp-zone.de

[munger 25]

Woo! Downloading now.

I love you DKM team!

[Harnu 0]

Very nice, and I also have to compliment you on your Bronco's. I really like those things!

[302_GySgt.Casey 0]

wow that pic is vrey cool

[blackdog~ 0]

Quite lovely

[Guest]

Um, very interesting muzzle flash

[Stag 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Rastavovich @ Nov. 22 2002,04:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">- AI wont attack MBTs anymore, but any other target<span id='postcolor'>

A VERY cool solution to the problem, one that BIS could bear in mind for the shilka and M163 in the next patch.

Excellent work, DKM!

[Prospero 1]

Very nice indeed. Good job.

Prospero

[slowyconection 0]

i dont know why but this tank reminds red alert 2...

but very nice one anyway

and, r those 2 firin things machine guns or sabot launchers?

[Eviscerator 0]

er, sabot is a weapon round...some machineguns can fire sabot rounds...although i think this one is firing HE

[munger 25]

I like it. The model is great. Engine sound is good. Cannon sound seems a little strange although I wouldn't be surprised if it really did sound like that. The new muzzle flash effect is curious. It's probably realistic but sometimes it looks a little artificial because of the OFP graphics engine. Quite innovative though. Against it's main target of aircraft it is highly effective without being super-powerful. The cannons are very accurate, the missiles less so.

Very nice.

[Tovarish 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Nov. 23 2002,07:11)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Um, very interesting muzzle flash

<span id='postcolor'>

Denoir: Go to this link http://www.rusarm.ru/comp.htm, click on "videos", and click on the thumbnail on the very bottom left of the page. You'll see that it's actually pretty close to the real thing.

[Hit_Sqd_Maximus 0]

The m109 is missing textures at around 150 meters...... it turns a dark purple.

[Rastavovich 0]

What M109?

[Bordoy 0]

Do any firework companies want to by this? lol

[Hit_Sqd_Maximus 0]

The m109 ADATS, sorry, I forgot you guys made an artillery m109 also

[Rastavovich 0]

We never released an artillery.

The ADATS will be overworked sometimes.

[MAsta_KFC 0]

Just a question. Right now as I see it, the Tunguska doesn't fire at enemy MBTs. The question is, in real life, if the MBT was the primary threat, wouldn't the crew at least fire at it in defence? Right now, the Tunguska just sits there like a duck and waits to be destroyed. Granted, I doubt there would be times where you'd find a single Tunguska vs an Abrams, but still..?

Otherwise an excellent vehicle. Keep up the good work!

[Stag 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MAsta_KFC @ Nov. 30 2002,06:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just a question. Right now as I see it, the Tunguska doesn't fire at enemy MBTs. The question is, in real life, if the MBT was the primary threat, wouldn't the crew at least fire at it in defence? Right now, the Tunguska just sits there like a duck and waits to be destroyed. Granted, I doubt there would be times where you'd find a single Tunguska vs an Abrams, but still..?

Otherwise an excellent vehicle. Keep up the good work!  <span id='postcolor'>

Because in real life, the only thing the Tunguska could really do to ANY MBT, not just Abrams is annoy the crew by chipping off the paint. Or run away. It's an anti-aircraft point defence vehicle. It protects tanks from aircraft, the tanks protect it from other tanks.

It's an old argument. rather than re-starting it, why not just use search to see what has been said in the past?

[xmurderx 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wardog @ Dec. 01 2002,04:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MAsta_KFC @ Nov. 30 2002,06:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just a question. Right now as I see it, the Tunguska doesn't fire at enemy MBTs. The question is, in real life, if the MBT was the primary threat, wouldn't the crew at least fire at it in defence? Right now, the Tunguska just sits there like a duck and waits to be destroyed. Granted, I doubt there would be times where you'd find a single Tunguska vs an Abrams, but still..?

Otherwise an excellent vehicle. Keep up the good work!  <span id='postcolor'>

Because in real life, the only thing the Tunguska could really do to ANY MBT, not just Abrams is annoy the crew by chipping off the paint. Or run away. It's an anti-aircraft point defence vehicle. It protects tanks from aircraft, the tanks protect it from other tanks.

It's an old argument. rather than re-starting it, why not just use search to see what has been said in the past?<span id='postcolor'>

it would be neat if somehow it was scripted into the addon that when it was approched by an enemy tank it would start to run away. or take cover or something. just a thought

[Rastavovich 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just a question. Right now as I see it, the Tunguska doesn't fire at enemy MBTs. The question is, in real life, if the MBT was the primary threat, wouldn't the crew at least fire at it in defence? Right now, the Tunguska just sits there like a duck and waits to be destroyed. Granted, I doubt there would be times where you'd find a single Tunguska vs an Abrams, but still..?

<span id='postcolor'>

If we would do that, the Tung would be a harder tank buster then the Shilka allready is, so we decided to let it out.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">it would be neat if somehow it was scripted into the addon that when it was approched by an enemy tank it would start to run away. or take cover or something. just a thought<span id='postcolor'>

Not possible without extern scripts.

[MAsta_KFC 0]

I'm not starting an argument, it was just a hypothetical question.

Just one more question. In real life, how effective would those AA rockets be if used against MBTs? Is the Tunguska actually capable of targeting ground threats effectively?

[Stag 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MAsta_KFC @ Nov. 30 2002,17:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I'm not starting an argument, it was just a hypothetical question.

Just one more question. In real life, how effective would those AA rockets be if used against MBTs? Is the Tunguska actually capable of targeting ground threats effectively?<span id='postcolor'>

Apologies, but The number of arguments questions like that have started...

Anyway, the SA19's do have a capability against ground targets, but don't have enough of a warhead to damage MBTs, perhaps not even Light armoured vehicles.