Maio 293 Posted February 14, 2012 Oh... what have I done :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
onlyrazor 11 Posted February 14, 2012 Oh... what have I done :D Don't feel bad. I'm sure it'll BLOW over in a week or so. Heh-heh. :p Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blu3sman 11 Posted February 14, 2012 Arma 3: Double Penetration? Hmm.. I guess this expansion improves simulation of tandem warheads, right?:rolleyes: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
onlyrazor 11 Posted February 14, 2012 Finally some use for those PG-7VRs, then! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonci87 163 Posted February 14, 2012 Well we have those AssRam Missiles confirmed :p Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
onlyrazor 11 Posted February 14, 2012 How about a new Predator control station, titled Predator Remote Intervention Control Kit. -This is Delta India Charlie Kilo 6-9, thread successfully derailed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
max power 21 Posted February 14, 2012 Now that this juvenile line of discussion has ended (and it has ended), can we stop spamming and get back on topic please? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
onlyrazor 11 Posted February 15, 2012 Yes, yes we can. Personally, I prefer expansion packs over DLC simply because online transactions are a hassle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
purepassion 22 Posted February 15, 2012 (edited) Today I have asked myself the question how future expansion should look like for Arma 3. Should they focus on content or technology? Meaning should expansions focus on content like adding new factions and units or be build around a certain aspect of the gameplay like, let's say, UAV technology or sniping mechanics and expand on that? What do you think? :confused: Edited February 15, 2012 by PurePassion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
papanowel 120 Posted February 15, 2012 I would prefer your second though. We already have plenty of stuff, the gameplay is more important for me than anything else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
onlyrazor 11 Posted February 15, 2012 Why not both? They can implement new technology centered around new content Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steakslim 1 Posted February 15, 2012 indeed, no point going with one without the other. BTW an idea for an expansion in the game assuming my memory serves me correct and it was stated the "nuclear gloves came off" would be to visit some of the areas that saw some of that action, and get some kind of post apocalyptic feel going on. I know BIS loves making new, and beautiful terrains, but a change of pace by making an entire region that looks like it was on the receiving end of some rampage by genetically enhanced fire breathing retard rage babies for several years would be a nice change of scenery. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
