Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 2, 2013 Any idea if i will be able to play with anything higher than Low visual settings? Medium to High in 1080p, if that 4 GHz clock is stable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k3lt 3 Posted March 2, 2013 I have 1680x1050 lcd screen, Medium would satisfy me anyway.. ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 2, 2013 I have 1680x1050 lcd screen, Medium would satisfy me anyway.. ;) Could go all the way to High without Anti-aliasing. Yours is a pretty balanced system, the CPU shouldn't bottleneck your current gen. graphics card. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leopardi 0 Posted March 2, 2013 Could go all the way to High without Anti-aliasing. Yours is a pretty balanced system, the CPU shouldn't bottleneck your current gen. graphics card. If ArmA II is anything to go by, that CPU will not be enough to use the power of the 7850. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 3, 2013 If ArmA II is anything to go by, that CPU will not be enough to use the power of the 7850. I completed the ArmA II SP & played for a year in MP with a Phenom II x2 550 @ 3.8 GHz & a Radeon 4890 @ 1080p, high detail. :) Either peeps have unrealistically high expectations, like 60 FPS at 1080p, or something else isn't right. Sure if you're going to simulate 64-team Singleplayer Warfare with 16 units per team, that may become a problem, but in MP/light SP? Come on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GunnerSnail 1 Posted March 3, 2013 Not on its own, but if you build a sufficiently equipped PC around that card, sure. ;)EDIT: Jokes aside, I will be testing the alpha on two systems and posting info on performance and optimal settings. The first system is the one in my sig, the second one is somewhat less powerful: - AMD Phenom II X4 960T - NVidia GTX 550 Ti - 4GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM - 32bit Windows 7 If you don't want to risk buying the game before you know how it will run, wait for Tuesday evening. :D Thanks. I will check Tuesday evening after work to see the results. ...but between you and me, you know I will purchase Arma3. :-D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stefanb 10 Posted March 3, 2013 So no chance for a dual core CPU to run this game properly ?:confused: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Neus 11 Posted March 3, 2013 Does overclocking the CPU really make a noticeable change in FPS for ArmA? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
postal vending machine 10 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) Does overclocking the CPU really make a noticeable change in FPS for ArmA? Definitely! ArmA is very CPU demanding. For me overclocking my I5 2500K from 3.2GHz - 4.5GHz made a huge difference in FPS/General stability. Edited March 3, 2013 by Postal Vending Machine Epha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leopardi 0 Posted March 3, 2013 I completed the ArmA II SP & played for a year in MP with a Phenom II x2 550 @ 3.8 GHz & a Radeon 4890 @ 1080p, high detail. :)Either peeps have unrealistically high expectations, like 60 FPS at 1080p, or something else isn't right. Sure if you're going to simulate 64-team Singleplayer Warfare with 16 units per team, that may become a problem, but in MP/light SP? Come on. Try a normal 50-player Wasteland in Takistan. When the server has been on for a couple of hours and you go to a town like Bastam, it's a diashow. I mean I would be happy enough if it didn't go below 30FPS, but the fucker dips down to 20 and even below it with lot of trees/buildings in your sight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 3, 2013 Try a normal 50-player Wasteland in Takistan. When the server has been on for a couple of hours and you go to a town like Bastam, it's a diashow. That's server-side problems, same thing happened in Warfare after the server had been up for several days without restart. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tickrate 10 Posted March 3, 2013 Hi, I planned to buy ARMA III, just let me know the configuration of my computer is correct: CPU: I7 3610QM GPU: Nvidia 650m (GDDR5) RAM : 6 Go I want to play in 1080p Thank for your advice :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 3, 2013 Hi,I planned to buy ARMA III, just let me know the configuration of my computer is correct: CPU: I7 3610QM GPU: Nvidia 650m (GDDR5) RAM : 6 Go I want to play in 1080p Thank for your advice :) In... 1080p - perhaps on Low-Medium with this config. You'd be close to maxing it out at 1366x768, tho. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sephisto 1 Posted March 3, 2013 Speaking for a friends sake - would a Intel Core 2 Quad be enough to run it? He has no problems running ArmA 2, although Wasteland can be a bit too demanding for him depending on the server. edit: if memory serves, the rest of his PC is 8GB DDR2 Windows 7 64 bit GT 640 1440 x 900 He doesn't have a SSD, just a 500GB HDD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leopardi 0 Posted March 3, 2013 That's server-side problems, same thing happened in Warfare after the server had been up for several days without restart. Yea, but those should be fixed somehow. The system requirements don't apply to MP at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MosquitoPower 10 Posted March 3, 2013 You guys probably had enough with 'can I run it' questions but, I'd like to ask too. With, i5 750 @2,67GHz HD5770 1GB 8GB 1333MHz RAM is it possible to play in 1080p with around medium? Or, around what resolution I can play in medium presets? Thanks. :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MegaPablo 1 Posted March 4, 2013 Im using: Intel i7-740QM AMD Radeon HD 6370m 8GB of RAM. Any help is appreciated! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EvenLease 11 Posted March 4, 2013 I think I'll run at high settings perfect fine with 40+ FPS with my computer at 1080P with a render distance of around 2k. Installing a SSD, so if ArmA 3 is optimized better then ArmA 2 in any way.. then I should be G2G. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grumz 10 Posted March 4, 2013 Me to I hope he could run on my PC : i5 3470 3.20Ghz Radeon HD 7800 1Ghz RAM 8GB of RAM Windows 7 64 bit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stk2008 14 Posted March 4, 2013 meh I aint holding my breath with this spec Q6700 ATI 4890 1gb 4gb ram and a slow ass hard drive :( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DigitalSweat 10 Posted March 4, 2013 I am hopefull after reading the previous posts, that my puter will run A3 Not sure if it would be beneficial to upgrade the processor, I am running AOA on high and it's not too bad. Will have to run fraps to check out the frame rates. Motherboard: ASUS P6X58D Premium Processor: I7 930 Quad Core @ 2.80ghz RAM Memory: 12GB Video Card: ASUS GeForce GTX 580 1.5GB DDR5 OS: Win 7 Ultimate (SP1) Monitor: Samsung Syncmaster SA550 - using HDMI System is housed in Corsair Obsidian Full Tower/water cooled My first post :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 4, 2013 The ArmA III GamesCom (or e3?) 2012 presentation was running an i7-9xx with a GTX 580 AFAIR. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DigitalSweat 10 Posted March 4, 2013 Thanks Iroquois, this is very good to know :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
reahax 10 Posted March 4, 2013 My system is this: Msi Z68A-GD65 (B3) (G3) I7 2600k Asus GTX 560 Ti 8g G.Skill Ripjaws 1600MHZ Cooler Master GX 750W 80Plus Can i run game med-high settings(1080p) ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k3lt 3 Posted March 4, 2013 Most likely as Arma games are mainly CPU heavy and you have pretty good cpu i'd say.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
