CrazyBaron
Member-
Content Count
53 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Everything posted by CrazyBaron
-
Gamers on Windows XP, is this joke? Even ATMs is updating form Windows XP now days Windows XP is long dead platform and not supported for long time. As it goes for your data please... if some one wants your data they will get it regardless. Whats the problem of updating to Windows 10 when they even give you it for free for 1 year? Vulkan is not even out yet and UE still performs better with DirectX than OpenGL
-
Windows 10 will be free for a year and there should be no reason to stay on older Windows You know that PhysX runs on CPU and NVDIA users not getting any GPU benefits for it? What % of GPUs does Mantle covers and what % does DX12 cover? Also Mantle is dead
-
ray-traced reflections are very demanding and it's still isn't full ray-trace render not to mention KZ works at 30fps... and not even FullHD in multiplayer voxel terrain is simple... but then again CE3.5+ removed it because it was too demanding or what ever reason... idk if voxel can be effectively used for more stuff especially for dynamic stuff dont forget that with every new hardware we can run more and more polygons and there is also tessellation so do we really need voxels? todays problem is not even polygons number but complex shaders that eat performance
-
it's not like GPU not using it's power in games right now... voxel tech is not polished and every engine based on it show nothing special or playable right now
-
How do you imagine that? Game needs API so it can talk to GPU and render stuff for it. Real-time ray-tracing? even best GPUs can't make playable FPS in ray-tracing right now not to mention amount of noise...---------- Post added at 23:30 ---------- Previous post was at 23:26 ---------- DX11 is faster than DX9 by around 30% and adds more features https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff476876%28v=vs.85%29.aspx LoL how is DX11 not allowing multicore and DX9 do?
-
sound like you don't know anything about DirectX...
-
yeah wondering this too... was expecting 1.2 to be part of make arma not war
-
they change it to 3072MB(currently only on DEV) and might increase more
-
why start new thread... http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?175688-Next-DLC-Speculation
-
front line infantry? nope most of them were nurses, radio operators in HQ, typewriters in HQ, spies, pilots and snipers no matter how trained woman is she is no match fоr trained man on front line, she will only causes problems
-
it's mods quality being just a re texture poop arma 3 had full mod support from the start and there is high quality mods like BWMod
-
We do have firing drills but I would love if BI add to Virtual Reality Training something like Interstellar Marines - Bullseye http://www.interstellarmarines.com/game/bullseye/ new armored vehicle wrecks?
-
i believe most players would preferred another fraction instead of naval combat that won't be used... the only way i see ships is when you can walk on them with boarding possibilities and so on... at the same time you need huge crew to use them...
-
is it possible to add button or make default load in Virtual Arsenal empty? also some of the body don't match color of the heads
-
how about reworked action menu in something more capable of doing work...
-
so it was 1 year... still no bipods for "infantry based" game... disappointed
-
http://www.bistudio.com/english/company/developers-blog/91-real-virtuality-going-multicore
-
it looks cool but uses only 1/4 of the FullHD screen? i bet optics have a way higher image guilty then 870x670 pixels when even phones have bigger... and this is why BI have fullscreen display
-
why would i have problem with opinion when HDAO or HBAO > SSAO is a fact? /o if HDAO and HBAO not precise and for kids then what kind is SSAO? maybe it's time to learn how they work?
-
it have way better performance on nvidia also... SSAO more realistic? what?... SSAO effect not even worth the -20fps that it eats but only create bunch of people crying about low fps didn't ask for complete remove but removing from settings presets so people who set very high, ultra will expect to see best and not get potato that is also real fps killer even AA x8 don't eat fps so much
-
can BI finally replace SSAO with HBAO for settings presets? SSAO is worse in every way and have no reason to be there it only have negatively effect for new players...
-
KAMAZ Typhoon and Yak 130 nice also wont be surprise to see KAMAZ Typhoon with MLRS module
-
little over 12k? this is why peak today was 22k? http://savepic.net/4711091.jpg (112 kB)
-
open(host) Altis ZSC 32+2 Controll Edessa map and it will probably answer your question
-
omg from the whole team working on Arma 3 i believe only two developer working on Zeus so plz stop this bs cry with "why bi not working on jets or optimization and put all team to work on zeus"