AD_clem64121

@Inlesco Thank you to speak for all the community of ArmA ...

@Chortes I see you point, and now i agree for MOCAP ( they should have moved/advise him to the addons section maybe ?). For me is mostly the multiplayer section that i don't really understand...

after all, I should not have use "wrong" but incoherent (sorry for my french) ,I mean the decision is not wrong, i don't know because they didn't explain they decision ( they should have good one !) and this is why I post some "meme and stuff" I just want to know the decision, i don't want to change the result ! I JUST CAN'T, But you know it is what i think... i don't really understand they decision and good for you if you can ! But like said @ice9 the promoted entries and the finalist show that Bi's had other taste that the "masse" of the Bi's community (AND NO, I AM NOT JUDGING ) it is just a fact

- Technical quality: technical design, optimization and innovative solution of an Entry; - Originality: originality and innovation of an Entry's concept; - Experience: overall gameplay experience, balance of design and challenge presented by an Entry; - Presentation: coherence and consistency of an Entry's presentation in terms of functionality and expression. When i see the result, sorry too say that, but i must be dumb, I don't see rationnal choose with this kind of standard ! Just look the Multiplayer section. I feel that i'm not alone to think that ! And for me it make me angry for the modder, because they enter in the contest thinking that this would be a serious one because of the amount of the price ! I Feel bad for http://makearmanotwar.com/entry/aZDNVtbCpA#.VNCvi_l5OKQ http://makearmanotwar.com/entry/2Nvm9bPQHl#.VNCwWvl5OKQ http://makearmanotwar.com/entry/eba3yzQZev#.VNCw2_l5OKQ Just With the standard they should have used, you can see that were are something wrong ! And that why some people feel Bohemia needs to explain their choices

Yup sorry for the mistake ^^ I usualy see mostly @super truite than you, so sorry for that ! I still hope that Bi's will explain there choise !

@benamaina I'm totaly agree with that, a guy from my group create the "Armageddon " mod for Muliplayer contest, he spent much 1000 hours to make the script work well for the tornado and other stuff, depending of optimisation for other player, he got 224 supporter, he was promoted, is mod was downloaded more than 40 000 time and he don't have a place for the final ? It feel like Bi's choose randomly the finalist, no offence for @zooloo75 but i feel like the "AIRSOFT: BRING YOUR A-GAME" with 45 supporter was a exemple of the bad choose by Bi's ... And i know my lack of bias because i know the autor of ArmAgeddon they supposed to vote with this condition or i'm wrong ? - Technical quality: technical design, optimization and innovative solution of an Entry; - Originality: originality and innovation of an Entry's concept; - Experience: overall gameplay experience, balance of design and challenge presented by an Entry; - Presentation: coherence and consistency of an Entry's presentation in terms of functionality and expression. Sorry for the "coup de gueule" =) http://makearmanotwar.com/entry/eba3yzQZev

Did you want us to pay for the port of cars from arma 2 ? When i see the hundred of good quality mods that we can get for free (and they have the quality to pretend to be paid !) I'm speechless...

just to see the difference ;)

This is just me who was worried about the fact that we can just see 75 insurgency serveur and in a other way 1375 Altis Life serveur in arma III ? no just me ?

i didn't know that ^^ last time i check the shogun dlc cost 0.40 $ but it could be a promo ! But it could be a good idea if the DLC is sold for 0.5$

ahah sorry for that

If BI'S is worried about the 18+ clasification, why they don't do like Creative assembly with ROME II and Shogun II ? make it a small DLC and those who want it buy it and the other just play the core game ... that work great with the total war serie ! ;)

Yeah http://www.rebgaming.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/this-is-war-arma3.jpg ...but blood has nothing to do with war... But wait and for the 12 years old children who play altis life ? BI's: Mission abord

Hi, did someone have the R9 update ? I have some issue with the r10 and agm and i can't find the r9 update... I like you work btw ;)

1REV v0.7 : Légionnaires camo CE : Légionnaires camo Daguet : chasseurs paras : commandos hubert : commandos marine : armée Belge : armée Belge DE : commandos Belge : PMC : FRANCE 0.7.3 : http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=21085 BELGIQUE 0.7.3 : http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=21291 Video of the mod This mod will add the French forces with CE and daguet camo with their berets and some Belgian units with jigsaw and desert camo. I add some rebels because I thought ArmA3 was missing some "low cost" units. There is a prototype of a flashbang grenade. Devs: 1REV gogus12 1REV Sebj84 1REV Super_truite Thanks to: BIS for their wonderful games 1REV Clem64121 for uniform's photos 1REV Mike for Belgian units and flashbang sound 1REV clan for testing and feedbacks. Credits: Purple FA-MAS pack (I've modified some things on it to make it compatible with the beta) Requirements (only for French units pack) R3F weapons pack Purple FA-MAS pack (inclued, so don't launch the game with both mods activated or it can cause some bugs) Balaclava pack DM M4 pack CBA Changelog 0.6.1 -Added commandos marine -Added Chasseurs paras Changelog 0.6.2 -Fixed a huge texture bug Changelog 0.7.3 -The mod will be adapted to the beta version -Reworked all models -Retexture of the French uniforms and helmets -Inclued FA-MAS pack -Belgian units will have F 2000 (mk20) -Added commandos Hubert (diver) -Added Belgian commandos units -Update of the Super_truite flashbang (inclued) -Commandos marine are now armed with HK417 -Added CE booniehat -Added some PMC in opfor Download : Belgian units French units http://www.1er-rev.org/