raptor90

What still wrong with IF44 ? Why is still so slow with patches ? Its caused by greed of ? BIS ? DS ? Why should not be BIS greedy ? If it they were... Asking money for actually licensed engine is just stupidity which discourages the potentially other developers/publishers which wants to use RV engines... Why should not be DS greedy ? If it they were... Asking 30 eur for a game which is not finished ( some sort yes... ) is triple stupidity, and what about the customers ? "Well, we are sorry but the game does not sales well atm and its pure loss for us, so we don`t care about the IF44 fans/customers and thank you for your money... Have a nice joy with current IF44..." I hope we will not see any announcement of this kind from DS, or else... ---------- Post added at 21:53 ---------- Previous post was at 20:11 ---------- Anyway, do you think that just more ( very much ) new units/models which don`t need BIS for help and royalties to do so ^^ would bring IF44 some refreshment ? Its really that hard to make some ? Really i don`t understand some things do i miss something ?

Become a "Internet Forum Moderator" and feel the really...

http://www.vg247.com/2011/05/27/us-army-spending-57-million-on-military-simulator-using-cryengine-3/ It can, why not ? Maybe. Too bad it has been not released for public use. Look if you think that some RV engines are pinnacle of the Sim world you might be wrong.

Not sure what you mean. http://freesdk.crydev.net/display/COMMUNITY/XML+-+Vehicle http://freesdk.crydev.net/display/COMMUNITY/XML+-+Weapon Search that page more, seems that Cryengine 3 can do a lot more things or equal as RV4 much faster. Dunno...

What about this ? http://www.twmod.org/content.html#.UTDVM6mI5ol X1Software should nicely ask them about cooperation, Iron Front 2 on Cryengine 3 ? :bounce3:

They work on fixes for DayZ... Or no, they studying the tries and vegetables be more realistic on Arma 3 engine... FPDR And Sea life too.

Then should not be it Arma 2 the Ultimate Infantry-Centric game instead http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/scale_small/0/56/1066418-952481_111047_front.jpg ? In sub-text "Ask a modder if you want it more realistic"...

Its not definitely blaming though. Its just summary of RV3 egine and its technological limits as an 2009 released game...

+1 Epic question.

No, but it could be in the expectation. Try CPU benchmark of vanilla Arma 2 and you will see why though...

Why me ? I am not "Arma" dev. Either modder...

You mean less FPS ? Damn, BIS should really give attention to x64 Bit and Multi-Core/thread optimizations instead some "Physx" But the "not necessary" words by devs are quite bad.

I am very worried about that word "centric". If you take it out the meaning you will realize that Arma 4 will be arcade. No different then OFP by codemasters.

Because its BIS !!! Like a boss studio, hyped with their "ARMA" games which is all but not simulators...

Exactly that happens when you want to make truly simulation using "RV" engine... It simply can`t run good, really it can`t.

You can see how "realistic" model is set in Arma 2 games... On expert difficulty place you as commander in M1Abrams TUSK and T-34/85 about 10 meters of each other frontally, don`t shoot. M1Abrams which has 600mm+ as a anti-penetration protection is destroyed by WW2 tank... I feel really cheated by BIS and their Ultimate Military Simulator... Even more that ACR does not work no matter how many things commands etc i tried. I look forward to Cryengine 3 simulation capabilities, still its better optimized than hyped RV engine.

Arma 3 = Arma 2 OA on steroids with hyped Physx 3 :butbut: and same, more than decade old rendering technology... Really, it will not run legless even on 2K+ eur PC.

What do you have still with those maps ? http://www.overclock3d.net/news/software/the_true_power_of_cryengine_2/1 Its about Cryengine 2 not 3 though which is better OPTIMIZED Arma 3 can only dream about Cryengines 3 features though.

Ye, no reason for CPU optimizations also though... Its like we are sorry people but even if you have GTX Titan, SSD and CPU like I7 3930K or even better your FPS will sucks even more...

I would like to ask a question about that Arma 3 tank damage system please one more time though. Would be possible to destroy M1Abrams Tusk frontally on expert difficulty by T-34/85 just like in A2OA ? Its damn awesomely realistic !!!!!

We would not be able to release Arma 3 in 2013... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8BRbM52gpc though

How about Sukhoi PAK FA T-50 Chengdu J-20 T-90 F-22 Raptor

Damn right !

I think single.

Horses would be fine too though.