Logan9773

Oh, I get it Dale! Your a raving fanboy who attacks me with zero argument every time I post. I'll just put you on ignore, thank you.

Pffft. They're lucky they got the $32, which I personally think is scam to sell a product they KNEW was never going to make it. Smells of Crysis 3.

Lol, watchout metal, the fanboy mods are looking to ban anyone who tells the truth about what is going on. But yeah, this game is turning into a disaster. It doesn't feel like Arma anymore. Like you just pointed out, its worse than vanilla Arma 2. The only thing I see positive so far is that the infantry movement is less clunky now. We expected better. Not worse. It feels to me like they are trying to make Arma more "COD" like, but they are failing miserably. Not to mention this ANCIENT engine is bringing ULTRA level PC's to their knees. 780's with high end i7 CPU's getting 10 - 15 FPS in MP. Thats ridiculous! I just don't know what to say anymore. Time to start looking for a new sim.

Well, from a few years experience in DCS:Shark and DCS:A-10C - if an IR is launched at you at low and close, your chances are slim. Flares do little to counter the new IIR seeker heads. I've read the SA-16 actually has two seeker elements now, one IIR and the other UV. Going in like Rambo just gets you killed. You need to stay high and bomb the shit out of the enemy before you go low. You only go low when the only thing left down there are trucks and APCs. Another thing to do is beam the missiles. Keep the missiles perpendicular to your aircraft and your speed high. With small missiles, you might get them to blow far enough behind you that the damage is minimal.

I'm sure your such an expert Phlux, how does the world keep going when your on break? And YEAH, the engine is 10 years old, and I hate break it to you, but engines are NOT designed to keep on going that long. This engine has OBVIOUSLY been stretched beyond its intended limits. That is why we are getting such lousy FPS, etc.

We Americans are still discussing joining the fight. Over chow.

Totally agree man. Thats a good rig your running on. Its the shit engine thats over 10 years old. Time for a NEW ENGINE.

Oh, so you think we and the middle-eastern / Russian forces all have the same stuff? Guess again. And I must say "thanks" to the Russians for making my fine AKM. Love it! ---------- Post added at 03:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:12 AM ---------- Yeah, was just watching a show on Greek islands the other day. BIS hit it dead on. UGLY! Sea, dirt, and scraggly small trees. About it.

Now THATS hillarious! LMAO!

Lol, noted Fanboy. Please tell me where you got those magical rose colored glasses. :)

Oh, were just getting started.

Trim. Don't know if its modeled in game though. Should be that 4-way hat at the top of your cyclic. :)

B. And this is why I want all this to go over to DCS, because that is exactly what they are doing. DLC Modules. You want a certain tank or plane, you buy it. And its as real as it gets. Of course, I'm still working on pushing them into making realistic ground vehicles. I COULD USE SOME HELP! :p As for Arma, this all looks like the act of a dying company.

Ahh, another new DayZ kiddie opens his mouth. ---------- Post added at 02:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:38 AM ---------- You guys should take a look at Crysis Wars. Nuke Tanks, futuristic projectile weapons, alien weapons. Would be an interesting port.

Voted yes. While the models aren't bad, there are just a few of them, and as one other thread pointed out, both sides have the same models with basically just different paint schemes. For a final game, its a train wreck. At least bringing in the A2 vehicles will give it some support.