Has any one else realized that so far the weapons and vehicles of the Fraction NATO, makes absolutely no sense and is completely un-realistic and all over the place? really! 1st, the RAH-66 Comanche was a canceled project since 2004!! 2nd, the TAR-21 and FN-2000? ha! both Israeli weapons.....why on earth would NATO or the U.S use Israeli weapons?!? it makes no sense. And 3rd, the Merkava "M4" tank? ha! yet again another Israeli vehicle that NATO would never use. ArmA III screams out that the developers clearly did little to zero research and just threw in any random vehicle, weapon, and or system that seemed futuristic just because they wanted to create a futuristic game. And last time i checked, what put Armed Assault and Operation Flashpoint apart from other war simulators like Call of duty and Medal of Honor was realism. don't get me wrong great story, but more research is needed. I know its supposed to be a, what BIS calls, a "Futuristic game" and i wouldn't mind if in this game, the U.S replaced their M1A1 tank with a tank that looks like the Merkava "M4" tank or that has an automatic 105mm cannon. All i'm saying is more research is needed.
(p.s, they should have just gone with another "what if" plot like in operation flashpoint, (e.g cold war almost turning into ww3), like oh "what if" north korea invaded the south koreans and Nato including the U.S got involved and causing the chinese to get involved while the Russians stood by in case the war got too close to them. like a ww3 scenario, but thats just me......)