-CS-SOBR-1st-I-R-

Its simple.. everyone experiences this problem. For some reason, when guns use a zoom the FPS drops... BIS is aware of that and will fix it in the next patch I hope, I have around 3-5 fps when using the M24, Mk12, SVD, or M4Scoped.

Why do you bother playing the demo when you have the full version anyway ?

Am I right when I interpret "metal case" as "NATO 7.62mm" as in the German SE ?

Use the NoGrass islands and your FPS will rise 10-20 fps

I have my own Special Edition to sell, everything unused ... anyone interested in a private german special edtion pm me please.

Cant wait for the next patch anymore ... really looking forward to it and hopefully they are working on the performance issue aswell. Btw. got this bug too

I second that. I was very pleased to really see the SU-25 from OFP in a ArmA Airfield. In my opinion a ... somehow ... weird picture lol And I need to back-up GranQ because actually his picture made me think that this ehh.. MOD ? is really progressing and not only discussed upon, like many other projects.

THATS WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR eJay has released two no-grass islands, namely Sahrani and Rahmadi. Source: http://www.armedassault.info/index.p....omments So.... Id say this topic has done its job ?

I must admit I really like this clip of the Czech Army: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcRLyeRBO6Q

Correct me if Im wrong but this is a off-topic thread... so we're free to post whatever we like and whats your point ?

Use and kind of photo programm (Irfan view, even paint), open the file (which is a BMP) and save it as a JPG file and wooosh the filesize is smaller. If it still is above 100 KB, use Irfan View to lower the resolution.

Well... to make my contribution to this. I think I need to support whiskey ... I have a rather slow pc (xp2000+ (1.66 Ghz, 1 gig ram @ FSB 266, radeon 9600pro) but the game is quite playable on medium on this machine. The only explanation I have for this is the use of SATA RAID0 ! I realized oul ofp was demanding on HDs and after a change it went smooth like whatnot ^^ My average HD speed is 100 MB/s so.... if you want to run arma smooth, get yourself a RAID0 system.

Too bad. BI should have a say in it, it's their product. In all honesty, I don't know a single person that will buy ArmA if it has SF. No drama, just facts. Seconded ! If they, for example, sell 20% less than expected, then it affects BIS aswell doesnt it ?

Can I spam a bit in here as it is going to be locked anyway ? I think it will not have Starforce .... by now BIS should have realized that many players would stay away from an ArmA with Starforce and UK is like Germany not a country where illegal software trade is that strong to use starforce.

Hey guys! Some time ago I started work on a mission called "Air Trafic Control" for OFP. Unfortunately I was not able to finish it. Yesterday I stumbled over the MBSR again and after reading it I decided to re-do it for ArmA. You can download teh MBSR (Mission Briefing and Situation Report) here: Air_Trafic_Control_MBSR_v.101 Please let me know if you like the idea and would welcome such a coop mission for ArmA. The main advantages of this mission, in my opinion is that the players are divided into 3 squads + 1 support which have their objectives are work in a joint operation. Of course the Irish troops meant to be used were those given free for beta testing by Imshi-Yallah in OFP and now in ArmA I will have to look for some other unit. I'd welcome any kind of feedback! Remember, the MBSR was set-up for OFP nor ArmA!

Who had expected the French to release the first ArmA addons ? Write it in the history books... its a FAMAS

ArmA Mark is a SP mission actually.... and the Demo has no singleplayer has it ?

7500LE ?? I belive it is ... well... nothing for gaming. Its not really supported and now even known or sold seperately. Only built in some systems.. in DELL I belive ?! It is way too weak. Many new mainboards have it as a on board chip.

Well... consider a fight in the mountains There the Americas have the advantage, so in the desert.

I have a real low spec system and still are okay with ArmA ... Athlon XP 2000+ Radeon 9600 Pro 128 MB 2x 512 Mb Corsair value Ram @ Pc-2100 Everything is running on medium, 1024x768 on Rahmadi = 25+ FPS on Sahrani = ~ 15 FPS Im quite happy with this low end system and such a performance... what I did: Downloaded laste drivers for my grafic card Changed some settings in ATI control center Used system booster (not too sure if it worked) Closed everything running in the background incl. explorer.exe (ended up with 18 things running only) Made sure my CPU and Graphic card are cool ArmA indeed is poorly optimized, good luck anyway.

Well the map is named Lybia ... But anyway, with Lybia not there in ArmA I will indeed have to change several things.

Ehh.... im planing to do the same thing actually, I had a mission in OFP almost finished and now are thinking of converting it to ArmA but dont know if people would play it. Please visit that thread to learn more about the mission called "Air Trafic Control". http://www.flashpoint1985.com/cgi-bin....t=56244

Im using 2x 512 Mb GEIL for over 2 years now .... they do the job just fine. Edit. sorry they're corsair

I would also like to know if there would be any advantages playing ArmA on a linux partition. I couldnt find a direct reply to this question in the above posts... Would it make sense to have a clear, light partition of around 5-10 GB (for addons to come) for ArmA only in linux or would the same partition in windows provide as much "push" on the games' performance ?

Im not too much worried about this... but I welcome people that realize such stuff.