spooky lynx

Reading Vilas' posts at couple of previous pages I realised that I read something about my own country, not Poland.

Hmm... I've tried to set shaders quality to minimum in A1 and got worse FPS results than in JCOVE (with playing both in urban area) again. So, I suppose that the matter is not only in normal and specular maps.

Hell yeah! Glad to see twin-seater :) One question: will it have ability of dual control, or second pilot will be weapons operator?

Human life have always been cheap. It is a part of our nature. So, there is no way to stop wars and murders. Untill only one human will stay alive on the Earth and he/she will have nothing to share/argue about with other humans. Earth without wars = Earth without people.

Didn't notice much differences between A1 and JCOVE graphics. I doubt that the same map even with that amount of objects in A1 or A2 will give the same FPS, that JCOVE has. Just simple comparison: I've never got 80+ FPS in Avgani with removed clutter and low/medium settings.

So, my 2 cents about JCOVE: 1) much more optimised engine - with all graphic settings rised to max levels I have 80-85 fps in missions, only dream in A1 and A2 :) 2) great map - I would be very happy to see such large and well-made desert terrain in ArmA 3) armor units have lots of very useful features 4) infantry models, sadly, are looking like those in OFP 5) but armor and air units look great P.S. I hope that the miracle will happen and all the features of free JCOVE will be implemented in paid ArmA1/ArmA2.

I'm playing in OFP/A1/A2 since 2002. Even now, spending most time with A2, still play OFP because it's the only game in which I have almost complete armies of about 20 countries. Sadly, neither Arma1 nor Arma2 don't have such variety.

Here it is: all the operators armed with AKM-GL and RPG-18 have the same rifle

T-72M1M is first name for export T-72B variant (later named T-72S). Then version with "Relikt" ERA, modern FCS, more powerful V-92S2 1000 hp engine was named so. And both T-72M and M1 are export versions of T-72A. M1 features additional 16-mm armor plate on front of hull and upgraded turret armor.

I've noticed that GRU operator with AKM-GL (with Vilas weapons config) is using polish AKM with Pallad GL. So, is it because I use both modern weaponpack and P85 one?

+1 for APC and ZU-23 carrier version of MTLB. And PT-76 in markings of Naval infantry and MVD.

There are thousands and thousands of mags from AKM, which can be used with AK-103/-104. So, there is no reason not to use them - no need to produce more plastic ones.

vilas, do you have plans for making additional APC version of MTLB? I think it won't take much time.

If one person steals something from other person, only thief should be punished. What is the fault of other community members? Did they knew about it but did not warn FAFw members? Or should the whole community after decision of modmaker to stop working find the thief and beat him somewhere in the dark lane? It seems like too many modmakers suppose that the whole community is ungrateful like that person who used their work without permission when closing their activity. So, in my opinion, only person who had stolen must be punished but not the whole community. And I think that special thread where such thiefs will be listed should be on this forums. So all the members would know them.

Yes. BTW, russian version of wiki Dana page states that it has 225 deg forward firing arc (not 80).

"Normal". I guess, those shadows belong to some objects that were ported from A1. Others, as I saw, have no problems with shadows.

Very nice map - lots of objects to play with and good perfomance. BTW, does anybody have an issue with some shadows? http://s60.radikal.ru/i170/1001/1d/00f8d3cabdf0.jpg http://s002.radikal.ru/i199/1001/6e/5e9ecd94cd9b.jpg http://s005.radikal.ru/i212/1001/93/8475e61486a4.jpg It's the shadow of one building, visible even through the landscape.

Thanx, but I have this stuff already:) I mean bigger pack with ICV, MGS, RV, CV, engineer and MC versions (both with and without slat armor).

Both AK-74M and AK-10x have no ability for being used together with supressor, because version of AKS-74U (AKS-74UB) was developed for special forces and recon units. Later, AS Val and VSK-94/9A91 became standart silenced weapons in armed forces. And if there's no ability to get them (sadly, these weapons are still produced in rather small numbers), AKM or AKMS with PBS-1 is used.

Hm... But what was stolen? And by who?

Voting for standalone Strykers pack.

Is it possible to make double control of plane form both seats via scripting?

Still hope to see some planes, which could fit A2 territory scales: A-37 "Dragonfly", EMB-312/ALX, L-29, L-39, F-5 series, PC-7/-9.

I hope that first of all lod bug will be corrected. Because of it all that soldiers are just unplayable - 3 squads of them on Utes decrease my framerate to 16-18 fps (the same I have with vanilla units but playing will all graphic parameters switched to their maximum) with "medium" graphic presets.

I don't understand, what is the problem to discuss. Some person had an idea, started to develop it, made some mod. As I have read at this forums, lots of community members said tons of words of gratitudes to Q and about his work. And what's next? That was this person's only idea and mod, his hobby but no one other's. So, I don't understand the first post - had anybody forced topicstarter to make this mod? Had anybody tried to make him develop it in existing way? No. And I don't understand, what's the reason to make such drama.