garack666 10 Posted June 3, 2009 (edited) Hi, i only run Arma 2 on this machine. No firewall no av. 9.15 ATI and creative xfi gamer win 7 drivers. q6600 and msi p35 chipset. 4870 1gb. fresh installation. Bluescreen says Stop: 0x000000001E comes after 10 minutes playing arma in multiplayer. not testet singleplayer. vista32sp1 run smooth 8 hours with arma. Win 7 Rc1 has all updates. Problemsignatur Problemereignisame: BlueScreen Betriebsystemversion: 6.1.7100.2.0.0.256.1 Gebietsschema-ID: 1031 Weitere Informationen über das Problem BCCode: f7 BCP1: 0000000000000F20 BCP2: 00001C81BCCD8B9D BCP3: FFFFE37E43327462 BCP4: 0000000000000000 OS Version: 6_1_7100 Service Pack: 0_0 Product: 256_1 Bucket-ID: X64_0xF7_nt!IoGetDeviceProperty+c7 Serverinformationen: 82f3d9bf-6db5-4163-ac03-7a7ff945fe70 Any help? Edited June 3, 2009 by garack666 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted June 3, 2009 Hi, i only run Arma 2 on this machine. No firewall no av.9.15 ATI and creative xfi gamer win 7 drivers. q6600 and msi p35 chipset. 4870 1gb. fresh installation. Bluescreen says somethink about drivers...cant read it so fast. comes after 10 minutes playing arma in multiplayer. not testet singleplayer. vista32sp1 run smooth 8 hours with arma. Win 7 Rc1 has all updates. Problemsignatur Problemereignisame: BlueScreen Betriebsystemversion: 6.1.7100.2.0.0.256.1 Gebietsschema-ID: 1031 Weitere Informationen über das Problem BCCode: f7 BCP1: 0000000000000F20 BCP2: 00001C81BCCD8B9D BCP3: FFFFE37E43327462 BCP4: 0000000000000000 OS Version: 6_1_7100 Service Pack: 0_0 Product: 256_1 Bucket-ID: X64_0xF7_nt!IoGetDeviceProperty+c7 Serverinformationen: 82f3d9bf-6db5-4163-ac03-7a7ff945fe70 Any help? Beta OS, nuff said. Eth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 3, 2009 Nope RC1 and defs testet win7 rc1 too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted June 3, 2009 Nope RC1 and defs testet win7 rc1 too. Use at your own risk. It's not a retail product. An RC is a glorified beta JFYI. Eth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 3, 2009 Please post if you can help or post not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchaxor 0 Posted June 3, 2009 (edited) Run Diagnostics on your RAM That would be my first guess. I do not think ARMA is the issue. I run Windows 7 RC as well and I get no crashes at all. Google Results: "If you read the error code DRIVER_OVERRAN_STACK in the minidump description it means that you have an infection from a hacker and the system is shut down so that said hacker does not gain complete control." "This is the classic "buffer overrun" hacking attack. The system has been brought down to prevent a malicious user from gaining complete control of it." You have a Trojan perhaps? Try getting malwarebytes or Spydot S&D and clean up the bugs. Edited June 4, 2009 by pchaxor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 3, 2009 Run Diagnostics on your RAMThat would be my first guess. RAm works fine under vista32 and is not overclocked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 3, 2009 I do not think ARMA is the issue. I run Windows 7 RC as well and I get no crashes at all.Google Results: "If you read the error code DRIVER_OVERRAN_STACK in the minidump description it means that you have an infection from a hacker and the system is shut down so that said hacker does not gain complete control." "This is the classic "buffer overrun" hacking attack. The system has been brought down to prevent a malicious user from gaining complete control of it." You have a Trojan perhaps? Try getting malwarebytes or Spydot S&D and clean up the bugs. Sry was a stop error i editet first post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
odjob 0 Posted June 4, 2009 Mine runs fine in Win7 RC even under stress, no bluescreens. I used to have bluescreens with "stop" about a half year ago, as a last resort i removed/reinstalled the gf-card and mem-sticks and viola! I guess one of them wasnt properly seated, just a tip. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchaxor 0 Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) Sry was a stop error i editet first post. Yup it is a Stop Error. I am making an educated guess that your OS is infected with a Trojan Google it friend. Edited June 4, 2009 by pchaxor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) Right now, I'd say it could well be down to your X-Fi. Speaking from personal experience, and from seeing problems that others have had, those things cause all sorts of headaches. Try removing it or disabling it and see if that does anything. Beta OS, nuff said.Eth That's a bit of an oversimplified way of looking at things. There's nothing wrong with 7. Even the pre-beta alphas were a better OS than Vista, and that's no exaggeration. (Or at least in my opinion based on my usage of both) Edited June 4, 2009 by echo1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 4, 2009 Yup it is a Stop Error.I am making an educated guess that your OS is infected with a Trojan Google it friend. its a fresh install , brings rc1 a trojan with :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) Right now, I'd say it could well be down to your X-Fi. Speaking from personal experience, and from seeing problems that others have had, those things cause all sorts of headaches. Try removing it or disabling it and see if that does anything.That's a bit of an oversimplified way of looking at things. There's nothing wrong with 7. Even the pre-beta alphas were a better OS than Vista, and that's no exaggeration. (Or at least in my opinion based on my usage of both) No, it's not. I wont even deal with customers who tell me they have it installed. It's shaping up to be a great OS and it's substantially better than Vista was at launch BUT it is not a retail OS and you use a beta/RC OS at your own peril. There are problems with Win 7 and a lot of the drivers are not stable yet and that's to be expected with beta software. You should never run a Beta OS as your main OS. Saying that the Pre betas of Win 7 were better than Vista at launch is probably fair comment but Vista SP2 is actually very good and Win 7 is not the vast departure that Vista was from XP, making it easier to get it right the first time and, consequently, in less time. Eth Edited June 4, 2009 by BangTail Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) got another BSOD this time i analysed it with windows debugging and symbols_ Microsoft ® Windows Debugger Version 6.11.0001.404 AMD64 Copyright © Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Loading Dump File [C:\Users\Tarabas\Desktop\MEMORY.DMP] Kernel Summary Dump File: Only kernel address space is available Symbol search path is: C:\Symbols Executable search path is: Windows 7 Kernel Version 7100 MP (4 procs) Free x64 Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS Built by: 7100.0.amd64fre.winmain_win7rc.090421-1700 Machine Name: Kernel base = 0xfffff800`02802000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0xfffff800`02a3be90 Debug session time: Thu Jun 4 03:16:00.001 2009 (GMT+2) System Uptime: 0 days 0:11:35.501 Loading Kernel Symbols ............................................................... ................................................................ ......................... Loading User Symbols Loading unloaded module list .... ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information. BugCheck D1, {ffffffffffffff81, 2, 1, fffff88004917f3a} Probably caused by : dxgmms1.sys ( dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+4a ) Followup: MachineOwner --------- 1: kd> !analyze -v ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (d1) An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high. This is usually caused by drivers using improper addresses. If kernel debugger is available get stack backtrace. Arguments: Arg1: ffffffffffffff81, memory referenced Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL Arg3: 0000000000000001, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation Arg4: fffff88004917f3a, address which referenced memory Debugging Details: ------------------ WRITE_ADDRESS: ffffffffffffff81 CURRENT_IRQL: 2 FAULTING_IP: dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+4a fffff880`04917f3a f687a800000001 test byte ptr [rdi+0A8h],1 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT BUGCHECK_STR: 0xD1 PROCESS_NAME: System TRAP_FRAME: fffff880023b8af0 -- (.trap 0xfffff880023b8af0) NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers. Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect. rax=0000000000000000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=0000000000000000 rdx=0000000000000000 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000 rip=fffff88004917f3a rsp=fffff880023b8c80 rbp=fffffa800694e010 r8=fffff880023b8ca0 r9=fffffa800694e010 r10=fffff880049162b4 r11=fffffa8007699f28 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000 r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000 iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz ac po cy dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+0x4a: fffff880`04917f3a f687a800000001 test byte ptr [rdi+0A8h],1 ds:00000000`000000a8=?? Resetting default scope LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff800028804e9 to fffff80002880f80 STACK_TEXT: fffff880`023b89a8 fffff800`028804e9 : 00000000`0000000a ffffffff`ffffff81 00000000`00000002 00000000`00000001 : nt!KeBugCheckEx fffff880`023b89b0 fffff800`0287f160 : fffff880`023b8b50 fffffa80`07699d50 00000000`07699d50 fffffa80`0694e010 : nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69 fffff880`023b8af0 fffff880`04917f3a : fffffa80`0694e658 fffffa80`07699d50 00000000`00000000 fffff880`04941dc0 : nt!KiPageFault+0x260 fffff880`023b8c80 fffff880`049423e9 : fffffa80`07699d50 00000000`00000080 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`0694e010 : dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+0x4a fffff880`023b8cd0 fffff880`04941e96 : 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`07699d50 00000000`00000080 fffffa80`0694e010 : dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitQueueCommand+0xa1 fffff880`023b8d00 fffff800`02b06e66 : 00000000`02c3c476 fffffa80`06a50b60 fffffa80`039cd040 fffffa80`06a50b60 : dxgmms1!VidSchiWorkerThread+0xd6 fffff880`023b8d40 fffff800`02833a86 : fffff880`009e9180 fffffa80`06a50b60 fffff880`009f3fc0 fffff880`01261a30 : nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x5a fffff880`023b8d80 00000000`00000000 : fffff880`023b9000 fffff880`023b3000 fffff880`023b8690 00000000`00000000 : nt!KxStartSystemThread+0x16 STACK_COMMAND: kb FOLLOWUP_IP: dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+4a fffff880`04917f3a f687a800000001 test byte ptr [rdi+0A8h],1 SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 3 SYMBOL_NAME: dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+4a FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner MODULE_NAME: dxgmms1 IMAGE_NAME: dxgmms1.sys DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 49ee92b2 FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0xD1_dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+4a BUCKET_ID: X64_0xD1_dxgmms1!VidSchiSubmitSignalCommand+4a Followup: MachineOwner --------- perhaps some issues with track ir5...will test this. Edited June 4, 2009 by garack666 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nicholas 5 Posted June 4, 2009 It's not because of compatability issues, as of I have Windows 7 RC Build 7100 64-Bit also, and I got ArmA 2 runnign smooth as can be. Maybe a device error? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sickboy 13 Posted June 4, 2009 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULTSounds like a Vista driver used on Win7 that is causing the issue? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
papoose244 10 Posted June 4, 2009 Has anyone tested windows 7 vs vista 64 with this game in which OS does it perform better? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 4, 2009 Win 7 performes way better for me. Yes a driver issue, but i got 4 different blue screen errors ... i suppose it could be track ir 5 software. check this out today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xav 0 Posted June 4, 2009 There are blue screens with Win 7 ? :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 4, 2009 tested it, without track ir5 running game is stable. must be track ir5. ich check the forums there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ruckus 0 Posted June 4, 2009 I'm also using Windows 7 64-bit RC without any problems. It is also possible that you may be having issues with either your vid driver or the X-Fi driver as they are both probably beta. I don't recall without being at home but I think I was using the Vista 64 bit X-Fi driver. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 4, 2009 yes xfi gamer is beta but i figured out hte problem. its track ir5 software.arma is running fine without. i do some test, test older version re/deinstall and let you all know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
papoose244 10 Posted June 4, 2009 Win 7 performes way better for me.Yes a driver issue, but i got 4 different blue screen errors ... i suppose it could be track ir 5 software. check this out today. Thanks garack by how much fps is it faster? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garack666 10 Posted June 4, 2009 Thanks garack by how much fps is it faster? perhaps 5 fps. loading is faster too and streaming. but this could be cause my hdd is a new setup with no rubbish. its a raptor btw. track ir 4.1 final works with NO bs so long...but its horrible with track ir 5 i cant look in all directions..so its the track ir 5 beta software..lol beta track ir beta os beta game...the world is beta:cool::cool::D;):o Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kr3v 10 Posted June 4, 2009 Personaly I get a blue screen saying Bad_Pool_header... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites