oblisk 0 Posted August 26, 2008 I recently got a 4870x2, an was quite eager to try ArmA on it. But I don't think ArmA and dual-GPU cards play well. I get massive slowdowns when looking up or down, the FPS drops into 1 (one!. Definitely a game issue. Will this be fixed? Oh, and before you say, I tried uninstalling/reinstalling the game, drivers, etc etc. All my other games work fantastically, but ArmA runs like it's being played on a 486. No joke. Anyone else ran across this problem? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
malik22 0 Posted August 26, 2008 Try renaming the arma.exe to fear.exe if that doesnt work Disable cat AI in control panel that will make the card run on one core should fix it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-=seany=- 5 Posted August 26, 2008 I had very odd problems with my 9800gtx sli setup in Arma. I could run everything maxed with AA on low @1600x1200 but some bushes/trees just lagged my PC to hell, even though they worked fine two minutes earlier @50+ FPS. I was convinced it was shader related. However, to fix this I had to turn Textures to Normal and use maxmem=512, now it runs like a dream. I use the "nVidia recommended" profile for Arma.exe. Â Not sure what options ATI owners have in their ControlPanel. What's your CPU and Ram? Ironicly enough, out of all my games Arma is the one that gets the biggest boost from SLI, even compaired to Crysis/BF2/CompanyOfHeroes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oblisk 0 Posted August 27, 2008 They all do nothing. The problem were the shadows, even when they're at Med or High, game massively slows down to 2-3 FPS. And what's with the performance? Even with a top high end 4870x2, I average around 20fps at 2560x1600. Although the drivers are a bit immature, I didn't know ArmA was coded THIS badly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilfury 0 Posted August 27, 2008 Try catalyst 8.8. They fix my problems with 4870. It was unplayable before than i changed to 8.8 and its playable again with decent fps. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oblisk 0 Posted August 27, 2008 Try catalyst 8.8. They fix my problems with 4870. It was unplayable before than i changed to 8.8 and its playable again with decent fps. Those are what I am on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ateryu82 0 Posted August 27, 2008 I can also confirm that Arma just runs terrible with my new 4870x2. I had a 7950gx2 before this and that performed beautifully on 1280x1024. Now I'm running on 1680x1050 and I have to set lower ingame settings to play properly, it's ridiculous. The card is funtioning properly (Cat 8.8's) because I get great performance on Crysis, Cod4, Bioshock with 8xAA Edge Detect. This is a massive dissapointment as Arma was a big reason for my upgrade. The features with most impact are Shadows (even on low they wreak havok, bad coding imo) and postprocessing. The features that are, coincedently, also the best looking ones. Haven't had slowdowns to 2-3fps but it has been unplayable on higher settings. And my resolution isn't even that high. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_Tea 0 Posted August 27, 2008 That is not a problem of ArmA itself, it is caused by bad drivers else it would happen on every card. It seems that no company can provide proper working dual gpu drivers for crossfire or SLI. Don`t blame ArmA or BIS for that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted August 27, 2008 i suggest you try copy arma.exe into one of names below and check the pefromance afterward ! sometimes using profile for other game may help remember it's best to choose application which using only DX9 and ShaderModel 2 (not multi DX7,8,8.1,9,9+ like Valve Source games) Quote[/b] ]hl2.exe SporeApp.exe AgeOfConan.exe tra.exe Jericho.exe MEM_7.exe Stranger.exe DevilMayCry*.exe MassEffect.exe GRID.exe witcher.exe mahjongg_artifacts.exe Studio.exe Diner_Dash_Flo_On_The_Go.exe BigKahunaReef.* Chuzzle.exe Backspin.exe AcesOfTheGalaxy.exe \half-life2Demo\hl2.exe \portal\hl2.exe \teamfortress2\hl2.exe \half-life2deathmatch\hl2.exe \half-life2episodetwo\hl2.exe \half-life2episodeone\hl2.exe \half-life2lostcoast\hl2.exe \half-life2\hl2.exe \counter-strikesource\hl2.exe \dayofdefeatsource\hl2.exe \half-lifedeathmatchsource\hl2.exe \half-lifesource\hl2.exe R6Vegas2_Game.exe AssassinsCreed*.exe Validator.exe GH3.exe xrEngine.exe FFOW.exe Settlers6*.exe MonsterGame.exe Nfs.exe BA2.exe DiRT.exe ForceSingleGPU.exe TW2008.exe TW2006.exe game.exe SupremeCommander.exe hl.exe SpiderSolitaire.exe Solitaire.exe PurblePlace.exe Minesweeper.exe Mahjong.exe InkBall.exe Hearts.exe FreeCell.exe chess.exe R6Vegas_Game.exe 3dsmax*.exe Crysis*.exe UT3*.exe Wargame-g4wlive.exe hellgate*.exe SinEpisodes.exe iw3mp.exe iw3sp.exe Matrix.exe *Stranglehold.exe Bioshock.exe wic*.exe LostPlanet*.exe sims.icd nhl2007.exe GodFather.exe pc_matador.exe AcroRd32.exe XR_3DA.exe Scarface.exe TestDriveUnlimited.exe mm.exe Gothic3.exe HitmanBloodMoney.exe NWN2*.exe TW2007.exe ARX.exe SplinterCell4.exe NFSC_demo.exe NFSC.exe RelicCOH.exe starwars_pc.exe LegoStarWarsII.exe fifa07*.exe fsx.exe primarysurf.exe CoJ.exe FEARXP.exe BF2142*.exe JustCause*.exe nhl06.exe battleofthegods.exe cccprev.exe RomeTW*.exe H5_Game.exe Condemned.exe trl.exe Inventor.exe Dwm.exe legends.exe gt.exe graw*.exe sweaw.exe game.dat Timeshift*.exe nbalive06.exe oblivion.exe x3*.exe gwdev.exe pop3.exe USM.exe BattlefrontII.exe speedDemo.exe speed.exe narnia.exe white.exe KingKong*.exe 3DMark06*.exe RD3.exe Age3.exe Suffering2*.exe Sam2.exe KingKongDemo*.exe BOS.exe CoD2?P_s.exe Fable.exe EiB.exe Sims2EP2.exe DungeonSiege2.exe fs9.exe AFR-FriendlyD3D.exe FEARspdemo.exe FEAR.exe ACTOFWAR*.exe Ehshell.exe X2-Demo.exe X2.exe tribesv_?pdemo_en.exe Swat4SPDemo.exe PandoraMultiPlayerDemo.exe Sims2EP1.exe PCMark05.exe PCMark04.exe PainGame.exe Speed2demo.exe MaxPayne2Demo.exe FFXiWinBench.exe FFXiBench.exe Biademo.exe Tiger 2004.exe Snowblind-Demo.exe Snowblind.exe BreedSPD.exe Breed.exe XPANDRALLY.exe TV_CD_DVD.exe TRAOD*.exe Battlefront.exe Sims2.exe ShadowVault.exe patriots.exe thrones.exe Pariah.exe nba2005.exe mohpa.exe GW.exe pol.exe Driv3r.exe DFX.exe Bia.exe TechDemo.exe aquamark.exe w40k.exe pop2.exe FarCry.exe WoW.exe EverQuest2.exe Speed2.exe Lithtech.exe Swat4.exe SwgClient_r.exe SplinterCell3.exe Painkiller.exe MaxPayne2.exe FlatOutdemo.exe CMR5.exe BfVietnam.exe LockOn.exe 3DMark05.exe 3DMark03.exe 3DMark2001SE.exe 3DMark2001.exe BF2.exe Morrowind.exe TW2005.exe TW2004.exe halo.exe UT2004.exe UT2003.exe RD2D.exe RD2.exe CT3.exe pop.exe RaceDriver.exe SplinterCell2.exe SplinterCell.exe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ateryu82 0 Posted August 27, 2008 That is not a problem of ArmA itself, it is caused by bad drivers else it would happen on every card.It seems that no company can provide proper working dual gpu drivers for crossfire or SLI. Don`t blame ArmA or BIS for that. I disagree m8. If the high end games I just mentioned run flawlessly then in my opinion I can easily blame BIS for performance on their game. It's a moot point though... Dwarden, thx, will try some of them out and see what happens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pauldarrington 9 Posted August 27, 2008 are you using vista, if so have updated to SP1 and updated your directx ? I had similer problems with my 8800 GTS until i updated everything now it runs like a dream with 40-50 fps on all every high Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kklownboy 43 Posted August 27, 2008 Vanilla ARMA, high and veryhighs, 1000vd, 16hdr, 1600x1200: Convoy Mission; 60fps with fear.exe, 40fps- with ARMA.exe...... Same as before, same as always, ATI you rename, NVDA you make a profile or use the default. Which works fine with the 177.83s.. XP32,2.92zConroe,2gigs1066,x-fi, 1950xtx's CF,2900CF, GX2sli, and now a 4870x2,(cd driver) kickin arma ass. Its not the tech its the hardware or the user, if your having issues Try harder... 4870x2 is absolutely fine.Faster than my GX2,and with higher settings, except i do not get all of the AA options as the GX2 had. It has eight, ATI has to High on this driver, 8.526. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_Tea 0 Posted August 27, 2008 That is not a problem of ArmA itself, it is caused by bad drivers else it would happen on every card.It seems that no company can provide proper working dual gpu drivers for crossfire or SLI. Don`t blame ArmA or BIS for that. I disagree m8. If the high end games I just mentioned run flawlessly then in my opinion I can easily blame BIS for performance on their game. It's a moot point though... Dwarden, thx, will try some of them out and see what happens. And i have to disagree with you, as ArmA works on my old rig with very high settings. If the game would be the source of the problem, it would be impossible to run ArmA on very high settings with an MSI GeForce 7600GS 512MB AGP card. I´ll build me an new rig in december, but an ATI card will most likely be not my choice. I put my money on Nvidia, at least i get working drivers from them. edit: And no, i don`t even plan to go SLI or crossfire, to avoid problems from the start. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oblisk 0 Posted August 27, 2008 BI needs to release a patch that utilizes dual GPU's better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ateryu82 0 Posted August 28, 2008 That is not a problem of ArmA itself, it is caused by bad drivers else it would happen on every card.It seems that no company can provide proper working dual gpu drivers for crossfire or SLI. Don`t blame ArmA or BIS for that. I disagree m8. If the high end games I just mentioned run flawlessly then in my opinion I can easily blame BIS for performance on their game. It's a moot point though... Dwarden, thx, will try some of them out and see what happens. And i have to disagree with you, as ArmA works on my old rig with very high settings. If the game would be the source of the problem, it would be impossible to run ArmA on very high settings with an MSI GeForce 7600GS 512MB AGP card. I´ll build me an new rig in december, but an ATI card will most likely be not my choice. I put my money on Nvidia, at least i get working drivers from them. edit: And no, i don`t even plan to go SLI or crossfire, to avoid problems from the start. And if the card/drivers were the problem then games like crysis and assassin's creed wouldn't run as great as they do. It depends on how you look at it. In my reasoning, a sign of bad coding is when other games look better and also perform better... Hardware is leading, software follows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FABfm 0 Posted August 28, 2008 That is not a problem of ArmA itself, it is caused by bad drivers else it would happen on every card.It seems that no company can provide proper working dual gpu drivers for crossfire or SLI. Don`t blame ArmA or BIS for that. I agree @oblisk The cards manufacturers make some fix for some games. I can't remember exactly when the drivers have been made while ArmA wasn't in the certified games list, but now ArmA is compatible with SLI cards. You must assume that the PC hardware is certified to use SLI/crossfire cards (cards, MB, memories, alim and games). Take a look on this web page, you have all hardwares and games certified for SLI cards (I don't know for crossfire). You can create a game profil on the CCC and you set your 3D performance and crossfire, but if your card/drivers/MB/game doesn't support crossfire, I don't think this will change something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kklownboy 43 Posted August 28, 2008 Ok , i find the 8.8.522, recent driver release is better than the CD driver;8.8.526. I did have a over heat crash... I set the fan temp to a kinda high setting but not high enough... This card has to be the loudest card ever! And it weighs a whole lb./pound more than my GX2 which was 3lbs.... Had some issues at 16hdr,... went to 8hdr. Now i get veryhigh in the AA option... NVDA does have HDR to 32, and the shadows are nicer...Still i can run all veryhigh and get in the 60fps/Vsync. Funny how playing Warfare, i start at max 60fps but it will decrease to mid 30s to mid 40s after a bunch of units start spawning, and doesnt get any lower...but it plays smooth, best smooth running frames yet at lower than 40! I believe its time to OC my CPU... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SnR 1 Posted August 28, 2008 i suggest you try copy arma.exe into one of names below and check the pefromance afterward !sometimes using profile for other game may help remember it's best to choose application which using only DX9 and ShaderModel 2 (not multi DX7,8,8.1,9,9+ like Valve Source games) How does one change the name of the exe. thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kklownboy 43 Posted August 28, 2008 copy your ARMA.exe, then rename the copy to a compatible.exe. I use fear.exe, gives AFR1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rossiski 0 Posted August 29, 2008 copy your ARMA.exe, then rename the copy to a compatible.exe. I use fear.exe, gives AFR1. How does one pick this new .exe that's been renamed within CCC? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FABfm 0 Posted August 29, 2008 How does one pick this new .exe that's been renamed within CCC? He means that you rename ArmA.exe to a compatible.exe (like fear.exe) copy your ARMA.exe, then rename the copy to a compatible.exe. I use fear.exe, gives AFR1. In my humble opinion, I doubt that it works if you rename with a compatible.exe. In these circumstances, we could rename a compatible.exe that supports quad-core, and everyone knows that ArmA doesn't support this kind of processor. you rename ArmA.exe by a xxx.exe (like fear.exe), which has already a profile "active" and already set. But this program is compatible with the crossfire, and this profile to be taken into account every time you launch this program (hence the interest to create profiles games), but this doesn't mean that the crossfire will be supported by ArmA, if it doesn't support it. There will be some improvements that following these settings already set and supported by ArmA, but nothing prevents you create your own profile ArmA (without rename) and put these same parameters (supported, of course). I don't know if there is a list of games compatible with the crossfire, and I don't know if the CCC has a problem to create some profiles games, but I think it isn't a good thing to do so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Goeth 0 Posted August 29, 2008 I can report that this problem is visible on 3870x2 series card also. If shadows are on high or very high the fps drops down to something near zero after 2 minutes of playing. Sometimes problem goes away for a while if you switch to 3rd person for a while. I tried all possible drivers to fix this problem but nothing helped, only way to avoid this was to keep shadows on normal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted August 29, 2008 Quote[/b] ]NVDA does have HDR to 32 all AMD cards beyond HD3xxx maybe even 2xxx could do HDR32 with AA enabled ... (exclude low end models) Quote[/b] ]In my humble opinion, I doubt that it works if you rename with a compatible.exe. In these circumstances, we could rename a compatible.exe that supports quad-core, and everyone knows that ArmA doesn't support this kind of processor. AMD uses special application profiles for games which need fix / improvement / forced AA etc. this is based on detecting the process name and sometimes plus partial path ... same goes for CrossFire profiles ... look at the list and that's what the server supports ... most often used filenames for generic profiles are fear.exe and oblivion.exe @FABfm your talk about rename to 'quadcore' support is nonsense ... the driver detects filename and enables or disables specific driver optimizing for that application , nothing else ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FABfm 0 Posted August 29, 2008 ... most often used filenames for generic profiles are fear.exe and oblivion.exe Generic dosen't mean Certified  @FABfmyour talk about rename to 'quadcore' support is nonsense ... I know, it was a joke. It was just a way to express my astonishment to rename an .exe  But never mind, anyway I have no SLI/CrossFire cards on my PC  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted August 29, 2008 ... most often used filenames for generic profiles are fear.exe and oblivion.exe Generic dosen't mean Certified  @FABfmyour talk about rename to 'quadcore' support is nonsense ... I know, it was a joke. It was just a way to express my astonishment to rename an .exe  But never mind, anyway I have no SLI/CrossFire cards on my PC  then i must wonder why you comment about thins you don't understood ... what's the value of such comments ... someone here is trying to get his issues resolved not just read some useless posts ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites