wipman 1 Posted August 22, 2006 Hi, really incredible; 'em all look great. Let's C ya Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
belgerot 33 Posted August 23, 2006 These new models.. great job! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted August 24, 2006 there should be a few more to make such as a standard cappacity hk33 and some kind of sniper platform i'm not sure what i want to make yet Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ironsight 1 Posted August 24, 2006 You might wanna add that those models were made by Drill Sergeant and now by you. Not the first time you forget that..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted August 24, 2006 Like i've said before unless it was just in the ofp.info thread its DSA's swansong Also to stick to the german theme... Very roughly translated, the pack will contain variants of the G36, HK33, G3 Mp5 and USP series weapons Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ironsight 1 Posted August 24, 2006 like i've said before unless it was just in the ofp.info thread its DSA's swansong Most people who posted above here are under the impression that the models are yours. You just make it look like the models are yours but they are straight from the DSA open source pack. Bit childish right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
j w 0 Posted August 24, 2006 Well FFUR takes a bunch of addons and put it in a pack and get all the credit, why can't Mark here do (almost) the same? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ironsight 1 Posted August 24, 2006 Well FFUR takes a bunch of addons and put it in a pack and get all the credit, why can't Mark here do (almost) the same? Because someone else does it doesn't mean you have to do it, right? Taking stuff without credit or permission is just rude and disrespectful and it makes you look like a wannabe when you just rip-off someone elses stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
j w 0 Posted August 24, 2006 Because someone else does it doesn't mean you have to do it, right? Ah, true. Very true. Well, from now on Mark should post credits for whatever he hasn't made, so we won't have any confusions (or alike). Regards JW Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ironsight 1 Posted August 24, 2006 Well, from now on Mark should post credits for whatever he hasn't made, so we won't have any confusions (or alike). Well apparently something's wrong with his eyes but I already told him this many times and he just ignores it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
j w 0 Posted August 24, 2006 That's maybe beacause your attitude sometimes make people ignore your comments. No offence, but sometimes you just manage to piss ppl off. (Especially me ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ironsight 1 Posted August 24, 2006 No offence, but sometimes you just manage to piss ppl off.(Especially me ) When? Sometimes it's necessary to give people a corrective tap on the hands. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
j w 0 Posted August 24, 2006 Can't remember and cba atm to remember, off for karate. I'll dig up a few threads and PM you And again, I didn't mean any offence, at all. Regards JW Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wipman 1 Posted August 24, 2006 Hi, i think that was cleared by Helping_Hand that the models were made by DSA Drill Sargeant, who made also the ACOG model on our (our said meaning our = all the OFP players) in the wip_m4's pack brought to us by Inquisitor, from his M4 Construction Kit, made by CS modelers/texturers, i gave all the credits that i had (names, nicks and info that i'd access to about the makers) and if my fella DSA Drill Sargeant who unfortunatelly i've no news of him because i loosen his mail/MSN, don't comes to complain, i don't know why you've to complain about the models property; i just don't understand it, once that was cleared that the models were made by DSA, fill posts & posts about something that's clear isn't cleaver. Instead add some "constructive critizism" you add "destructive critizism" bringing down Helping_Hand with those complains. If helping_hand have the DSA models belive me that's because DSA sent 'em to him. Good luck helping_hand. Let's C ya Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ironsight 1 Posted August 24, 2006 Instead add some "constructive critizism" you add "destructive critizism" bringing down Helping_Hand with those complains. If helping_hand have the DSA models belive me that's because DSA sent 'em to him. Good luck helping_hand. Let's C ya It's not because he sent them to him. DSA published them over here . It's been posted several times on these forums. And please try to write in a bit more clearer way. Some of your stuff is unreadable but that has been mentioned before I believe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackal326 1182 Posted August 24, 2006 Instead add some "constructive critizism" you add "destructive critizism" bringing down Helping_Hand with those complains. If helping_hand have the DSA models belive me that's because DSA sent 'em to him. Good luck helping_hand. Let's C ya It's not because he sent them to him. DSA published them over here . It's been posted several times on these forums. And please try to write in a bit more clearer way. Some of your stuff is unreadable but that has been mentioned before I believe. English isn't everyone's first language, try to take that into account when picking fault with their grammar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
j w 0 Posted August 24, 2006 A good example pointed out ^^ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ironsight 1 Posted August 24, 2006 Instead add some "constructive critizism" you add "destructive critizism" bringing down Helping_Hand with those complains. If helping_hand have the DSA models belive me that's because DSA sent 'em to him. Good luck helping_hand. Let's C ya It's not because he sent them to him. DSA published them over here . It's been posted several times on these forums. And please try to write in a bit more clearer way. Some of your stuff is unreadable but that has been mentioned before I believe. English isn't everyone's first language, try to take that into account when picking fault with their grammar. This has nothing to do with knowing the language. This is just trying to talk "gangstah". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted August 24, 2006 could we please have some order in my thread, to restore order in my thread drool over this WIP Image *bibs may be required* *oh and be warned its over 1mb and its a JPEG* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted August 30, 2006 Time for an update to keep the thread alive... Read the annotations Oh BTW Ignore the many spelling errors they were done very quickly. G36Cs Thats what i have to work from right now for them any additions you'd like to see ? Points Of Intrest * Textures are being worked on by a crack team of texture artists * CAMO textures are being done by the magical Wipman * Barrel Of G36 now accurate, G36K ones are being done as i type * Added numerous little things to the models, and trying to bring the face count down around 5-6000 7000 at a maximum for most of the models... * 6.8mm versions are planned after a conversation me and "freshman" hand over msn about how easy it would be in real life to do it let alone OFP * and also i plan to add yet some more things to the weapons including the MP7s, MP5s and a special surprise based round the HK417 Â Â Stay tuned guys and gals Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shadow NX 1 Posted August 30, 2006 * Added numerous little things to the models, and trying to bring the face count down around 5-6000 7000 at a maximum for most of the models... Wow... you do know that there are detailled tanks, helicopters etc with a lesser facecount? I mean its your pack but looking at these numbers it seems insane, there are quite a few things you can also do with a good texture already i think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackal326 1182 Posted August 30, 2006 Fundamentally, you could simulate an M16A2 by connecting a few simple cubes together, texturing them entirely black, and then naming it an M16A2 and coding it accordingly. Far be it for me to step out of line, but I like detail in my models. If people didn't like added detail, we'd still be sat here playing with default CWC units, and wouldn't have any of our wonderful addons that we have. I'm not going to get into an argument over polycounts, but I will agree that 7,000 is excessive. That said, I've broken that with some of my weapons and as long as its setup correctly in terms of the LODs etc (so it drops the face-count down, and quickly the further you get away from the weapon), I can't see their being many problems. Again, that said, people still running anything less than 1GHz processors and with less than 256MB of RAM will undoubtably suffer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adumb 0 Posted August 30, 2006 I can't believe anybody with half a brain would attempt bringing such models into OFP/ArmA. I could see having 6k/7k polys for a vehicle... but not a weapon. Will you even attempt giving them proper UV maps? ....or will you just be mapping them in o2? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted August 31, 2006 i guess your one of the people that would like to still be playing with CWC standard stuff... people make and have made the high poly/face stuff to try and bring ofp into the 21st century. i'm gonna continue on this pack high face count or not and if i can i'll get the count down to a reasonable level if not theres nothing i can do, now you either like the work or you dont so frankly i'm not really botherd what you say if its not really very constructive. with regards to mapping i'll tell u at a later date how it goes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king homer 1 Posted August 31, 2006 i guess your one of the people that would like to still be playing with CWC standard stuff... people make and have made the high poly/face stuff to try and bring ofp into the 21st century. No, we don't like playing with standard stuff but we maybe can't afford the money to buy hardware upgrades for every new weapon released. And Flashpoint isn't the freshest anymore, this game just don't want such highpoly models. Really, even my tank has less polies than one of you weapons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites