Icabola 0 Posted January 16, 2002 I believe both of them (majority people) have the same spirit for peaceful relationship.... UN peace keeping force must be there.... Israeli must withdraw from Palestinian territory...(based on existing agreement) ...and Palestinian have to stop suicide bombing, arrest the Alfatah-member or other Jihad-member that really against human rights. Again UN Peace Keeper should be there....(but why Israeli always reject this???) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damage Inc 0 Posted January 16, 2002 Nah, I can't think of anything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 I have an idea, but noone will like it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damage Inc 0 Posted January 16, 2002 Does it involve nukes? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Assault (CAN) 1 Posted January 16, 2002 Neither can I..... I have a feeling that this will be a LONG thread. IMO, there is no perfect solution to the violence in the middle east, this is a very complicated problem and can't be made simple. They have been fighting since Israel declared itself a nation and I am beginning to think that we should just let them fight it out. Some of the Israelis/Palestinians are so set in their ways of hate that they cannot be reasoned with. Both sides just need to make their peace and I think that process can be hurried along if Yasser Arafat was gone. He doesn't seem to have control over his police force or his populace. I also think that the U.S. should withdraw it's $$$ for the Israeli military. This topic has been disscused several times before and it leads nowhere, the same can be said about the conflict in the Middle East. Tyler Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pete 1 Posted January 16, 2002 to let them "fight it out" is out of the question. a modern army vs pretty-much-nothing. a third party has to get in between and FORCE both of them to stop the fighting, a un peacekeeping force or something.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted January 16, 2002 I agree with CAN, the violence has become part of their culture almost, and it is disgusting how both parties have (lots) of people advocating the continuation of violence. Maybe we should build a big wall around Israel and the countries bordering her immediately (the wall will go around Lebanon, Syria, Egypt etc.) and declare the inside into a war zone, and give everybody who likes peace etc. 1 year to leave it. After that we let them slaughter each other, and once they are fed up we let civilization back in. Alternatively, we could end this whole affair by declaring Jerusalem a free city under UN supervision and protection. The UN force protecting it should be communist or Buddhist or from some other neutral party; because if the force consists of Jews/Christians/Muslims, they will only start fighting for the place. If it is under neutral control (ie people who dont give a damn) then everybody can be assured that they are indeed neutral. Also, Palestine and Israel should be ethnically divided for a while to calm down a bit. Palestine needs to be declared a free state, with border and everything, Israel must accept these borders. Once Palestine starts going as a normal country type thing, then things will calm down. Palestine SHOULD be given a military though, this will be needed to keep the violence in check. And Jerusalem should remain under UN supervision and protection, or maybe declared a city state (like Vatican City), with its own guards and promised UN protection. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 Who had the land originally, give it to them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted January 16, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Monkey Lib Front @ Jan. 16 2002,19:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Who had the land originally, give it to them.<span id='postcolor'> Kinda hard to tell. Before Israel, it was all Arabic land. Before that, the Turks had it. Before that it was part of the Byzantine Empire. Before that, it was part of the Roman Empire. Before that, Greece had it. Before that, it was bandit country (no real power present). Before that it was the Egyptians. Before that it was the Babylonians. I have reached something like 4000 B.C. now, and it is still not possible to determine who's land it is. Maybe it should all be given to me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 Most land invasion stuff has ended now exept west bank and the indian pakistani thing, i think the israelis should have it because the palistinians are really just the nomads and are just trying to muscle in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 No, it doesn't involve nukes. I think the palestinians want war, so let them have at it. Let the arabs and israelis fight it out. Winner take all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted January 16, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Monkey Lib Front @ Jan. 16 2002,20:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Most land invasion stuff has ended now exept west bank and the indian pakistani thing, i think the israelis should have it because the palistinians are really just the nomads and are just trying to muscle in.<span id='postcolor'> No, read my post, they had it before the Israeli's, when it was under British rule (which I forgot to mention). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (OBiJuan @ Jan. 16 2002,20:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No, it doesn't involve nukes. Â I think the palestinians want war, so let them have at it. Â Let the arabs and israelis fight it out. Â Winner take all.<span id='postcolor'> Where did the nukes come from? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 Someone (Damage) asked if it involves nukes. Sorry to confuse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted January 16, 2002 Doesn't it come from an old thread, suggesting to nuke the Middle East and create the world's biggest parking lot? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Ex-RoNiN @ Jan. 16 2002,09:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Doesn't it come from an old thread, suggesting to nuke the Middle East and create the world's biggest parking lot?<span id='postcolor'> No! It's my fault! I responded to the third post without quoting! I'm SORRY! *WAAAH!* Now I confused the monkey. Confused monkeys are funny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted January 16, 2002 Who the heck r u callin a monkey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Ex-RoNiN @ Jan. 16 2002,10:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Who the heck r u callin a monkey  <span id='postcolor'> Uh, monkeylib. Not you. Oh gosh - I better stfu before I dig a deeper hole. Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Assault (CAN) 1 Posted January 16, 2002 Well the Middle East wouldn't make a very good parking lot. After all, I would have to drive half way around the world to use it! Then I would have to walk the other half back to my work place. Not very efficient if you ask me Tyler Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pete 1 Posted January 16, 2002 exronin...very nice idea with the "vatican city" there was more than one thread with "nuke arabs/muslims/palestinians/everybody"..mostly started by.erhm..someone Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
silent wings 0 Posted January 17, 2002 simple really, blow them both up.then they CANT kill each other,if they are too stupid to stop the war themselves then maybe we can help by ....um crashing a small moon onto them or by dropping a rock the same size as britneys ego onto the general area. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted January 17, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Pete @ Jan. 16 2002,21:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">exronin...very nice idea with the "vatican city" <span id='postcolor'> Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted January 17, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Ex-RoNiN @ Jan. 16 2002,21:06)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No, read my post, they had it before the Israeli's, when it was under British rule (which I forgot to mention).<span id='postcolor'> Go to the library, and read some intelligent Mid-East recent history books that were published before the WEB with all of it's nonsense conent came out. What you're saying his simply false, as in wooden teeth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blink Dog 0 Posted January 18, 2002 First of all the UN would just screw it up even more. I personally would rather see Isreal on top. Isreal is a lot more friendly to European and north American policies. I think duking it out is really the only way. The truth by any side has been diluted and distorted for so long that no one really knows why it really ever started. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites