Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
pogingwapo

Gunmen take 200+ student hostages

Recommended Posts

Quote[/b] ]Austrian Die Presse demands that Russian nuclear arsenals are taken under international control, due to instability in the Russian Federation.

Ha ha ha, that's one of the funniest things i've read lately. Maybe hand the nuclear arsenal to Austria? Or maybe take Germany and Austria (and perhaps Italy and Japan) under international control because of their actions which led to millions of dead? Nonsense that is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

offcorse Pathy, but little country like that against the big russia... Noone likes killing children only those who are mentaly insane or those who lost em them selves in a brutal way.

There wont be peace after this, it´s one of the longest war of this centry and we know how russians diplomatic relations with chechnya was before, well some of you. The election i 96 I belive proved how russian diplomacy works, by starting the war all over. Putin likes to talk and thats the only thing he can do, russians gonna pull out once the oil runs out. This is gonna be big wakeup call for the world about chechnya. How many of you cared about it before? Well I did and that´s why Im writing these posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote[/b] ]I really hope that is a spelling mistake, if not...I don't even want to mention my thoughts about you...and if killing civilians is "fair", then let russia just blow up whole chechenya...

That´s what they pretty much did, do you know how much of grozy is left? It´s all about retaliation it wont stop untill one of em stops. Like I said I dont look at this from one side only.

grozny-ap.jpg

Quote[/b] ]Umm...children that was inside there said they had to drink their own urin because the terrorists wouldn't take in food and water. They weren't even allowed to cry or move.

They aren´t stupid they know how russians can gas em and how they can put sleeping drugs in the food and water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote[/b] ]Austrian Die Presse demands that Russian nuclear arsenals are taken under international control, due to instability in the Russian Federation.

Ha ha ha, that's one of the funniest things i've read lately. Maybe hand the nuclear arsenal to Austria? Or maybe take Germany and Austria (and perhaps Italy and Japan) under international control because of their actions which led to millions of dead? Nonsense that is.

Actually ,the fear is that parts of the russian Nuclear arsenal may fall into the hands of terrorists.There is already big fear about a number of suitcase nuke's russia once produced that "dissapeared" in some numbers and for wich people fear they could be sold on the market.

Another thing is russia's maintainance of it's material ,hardly very good and as thus worrying ,take the example of the kursk as one ,te possibilety for accidents are there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote[/b] ]Or maybe take Germany and Austria (and perhaps Italy and Japan) under international control because of their actions which led to millions of dead?

That´s exactly what happened after WW 1 and WW 2. Can´t you remember ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are already agreements between the states about shortening the nuclear arsenal. But going farther and establishing international control over it is unlikely, at least in our times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote[/b] ]That´s exactly what happened after WW 1 and WW 2. Can´t you remember ?

I knew somebody would say that wink_o.gif Of course i know about that, in my post i meant establishing control over those countries nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crackerjack, i will not cast aspersions on yourself to personally attack you, but do understand this.

The rest of the world have no quarells with anyone who seeks self determination, but do so peacefully and on the negotiation table for to choose the path of violence is to condemn all to death, as those seeking self determination may not have the mandate of the majority and will be dealt as criminals under state laws, but the world is still prepared to listen to u and willing to lend a listening ear.

However mankind has always use religion as a tool to control the masses throughout history, for in the absence of the almighty, many claim to speak thru his voice and others who fear punishment throughout eternity usually toe the line.

Which other faith has used such tools than militant islam who had twisted that peaceful religion into something which appeals to simple minded folks who have no jobs and no future to die for their faith so that they may have 72 virgins and screw for eternity? Women to be submissive to their husbands and men is paramount in all things even no need to be monogamous? Very appealing theory to men who no longer seeks reasoning and logic and just put their faith onto the state's religion, free to murder anyone including defenseless women and children just because not of their religion in the name of protecting their faith which just any village mullah can declare war, dont even need the head of state or secular organs to decide upon.

The world has tolerated for years such theories in the respect of freedom to worship rights. However, years have proven scumbags can twist such a religion to their own interpretation and use fools to achieve their own ambitious aims and we have witness unprecedented horror committed against the rest of the world from such beasts who killed non-combatants shouting the name of the same God that good muslims kneel to, for its only such a faith that such society allows fringe elements to exist without control and unchecked.

My point is, its only such a religion from which we saw horror emaniating from, and worse still, anyone who speaks up is considered a discriminating element who denys others a right to worship their god, and many such beasts get misplaced sympathy which is taken advantage of, therefore eluding the justice that should be taken against such beasts, not contained within a country, but supported by fellow other religious states who on one side denounce them but on the other hand give them food, water and condem the rest of the world for persecuting them.

Enough!!!!!! i say!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote[/b] ]i meant establishing control over those countries nowadays.

That´s still the case. We are for example not allowed to have nukes and our submarines for example are limited in size and amount. A lesson learnt throughout WW2. So there is indeed weapon control in germany.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote[/b] ]That´s still the case. We are for example not allowed to have nukes and our submarines for example are limited in size and amount. A lesson learnt throughout WW2. So there is indeed weapon control in germany.

That's not what i meant by saying "internatinal control" smile_o.gif The amount of nukes in Russia's nuclear arsenal is in fact internationally controled too. I'm of course not a specialist in politics but as i remember in the years of Cold War Germany was under total control of USA (or countries of the West so to say) and USSR. Or wasn't it total?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

phil Im not here either to make personal attacks Im here to talk about Chechnya.

Offcorse they choose path of violence its a war out there. This isnt something that happaneds once in a while, people are dying on the battlefield all across the Chechnya every day.

Islam is a different religion and culture and I do not expect you to understand any of it, if they choose to live their way that is non of any others bussines.

And all that talk about listening, noone has and noone will because this will be forgotten in a month or so but they will still keep dying. Russians have expelled all foren aid agencies and do not alow any supervision and that tells only one thing.

The thing about repelling other religions that´s where you are wrong, muslims are more tollerable then Christianity, I dont have time to rable on about munks in africa, crusades and holocast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was holocaust an act of Christianity or one man's rage against Jews Cracker Jack?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote[/b] ]I really hope that is a spelling mistake, if not...I don't even want to mention my thoughts about you...and if killing civilians is "fair", then let russia just blow up whole chechenya...

That´s what they pretty much did, do you know how much of grozy is left? It´s all about retaliation it wont stop untill one of em stops. Like I said I dont look at this from one side only.

[im]http://www.lurchmag.com/grozny-ap.jpg[/img]

Quote[/b] ]Umm...children that was inside there said they had to drink their own urin because the terrorists wouldn't take in food and water. They weren't even allowed to cry or move.

They aren´t stupid they know how russians can gas em and how they can put sleeping drugs in the food and water.

Yes I know they have already bombed grozny, but it's still not fair to kill civilians...and the water and food was of course not ment for the hostage takers...why would the russian goverment feed them? The russian goverment ain't stupid.

Remove image tags when quoting - Placebo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An interesting pic

civvysniper.jpg

A civilian with a scoped AK/SKS(?) aiming at school...off CNN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what u talking about, they just give food and offcorse hungry chechens want to eat too.

It´s not just Grozny, most of the cities and villages look like that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crackerjack, i will not cast aspersions on yourself to personally attack you, but do understand this.

The rest of the world have no quarells with anyone who seeks self determination, but do so peacefully and on the negotiation table for to choose the path of violence is to condemn all to death, as those seeking self determination may not have the mandate of the majority and will be dealt as criminals under state laws, but the world is still prepared to listen to u  and willing to lend a listening ear.

However mankind has always use religion as a tool to control the masses throughout history, for in the absence of the almighty, many claim to speak thru his voice and others who fear punishment throughout eternity usually toe the line.

Which other faith has used such tools than militant islam who had twisted that peaceful religion into something which appeals to simple minded folks who have no jobs and no future to die for their faith so that they may have 72 virgins and screw for eternity? Women to be submissive to their husbands and men is paramount in all things even no need to be monogamous? Very appealing theory to men who no longer seeks reasoning and logic and just put their faith onto the state's religion, free to murder anyone including defenseless women and children just because not of their religion in the name of protecting their faith which just any village mullah can declare war, dont even need the head of state or secular organs to decide upon.

The world has tolerated for years such theories in the respect of freedom to worship rights. However, years have proven scumbags can twist such a religion to their own interpretation and use fools to achieve their own ambitious aims and we have witness unprecedented horror committed against the rest of the world from such beasts who killed non-combatants shouting the name of the same God that good muslims kneel to, for its only such a faith that such society allows fringe elements to exist without control and unchecked.

My point is, its only such a religion from which we saw horror emaniating from, and worse still, anyone who speaks up is considered a discriminating element who denys others a right to worship their god, and many such beasts get misplaced sympathy which is taken advantage of, therefore eluding the justice that should be taken against such beasts, not contained within a country, but supported by fellow other religious states who on one side denounce them but on the other hand give them food, water and condem the rest of the world for persecuting them.

Enough!!!!!! i say!

Mm. I couldn't have put it better myself, actually. I totally agree with you.

I must have misunderstood your previous posts, philcommando, into thinking that you were putting an attack on all muslims in general, but thanks for clearing that up in this one.

[edit] BTW, if anybody wants to gain a general understanding of this islam, you can check out this site., but especially this page on what it says about terrorism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An interesting pic

[im]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v358/mr_rOk/civvysniper.jpg[/img]

A civilian with a scoped AK/SKS(?) aiming at school...off CNN

Yer i seen that they said he was just trying to watch the cobat from afar. his finger ain't on the trigger.

CrackerJack lets not talk about Jihads, ok.

Remove image tags when quoting - Placebo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Im not, but if you want to then let´s do it.
Quote[/b] ] I dont have time to rable on about munks in africa, crusades and holocast.

Who was talking about them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yer i seen that they said he was just trying to watch the cobat from afar. his finger ain't on the trigger.

Trigger safety, it's not because I don't have my finger on the trigger of my gun that I'm not going to use it.

But yeah, it looks like he's just observating the scene.

A caption I read for this picture sad they were apart of the police forces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a reply to phil, and I wrote as the quote says that I didnt have time and didnt write anything about it. Those are just topics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was a reply to phil, and I wrote as the quote says that I didnt have time and didnt write anything about it. Those are just topics.

ok sorry for mis-understanding you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yer i seen that they said he was just trying to watch the cobat from afar. his finger ain't on the trigger.

Trigger safety, it's not because I don't have my finger on the trigger of my gun that I'm not going to use it.

But yeah, it looks like he's just observating the scene.

A caption I read for this picture sad they were apart of the police forces.

Anyway if i was going to use it i wouldn't sit like that, but is that a good position to be in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×