jimz0rz 0 Posted January 6, 2002 1744 -AMD Athlon 900mhz -256MB PC100 SDRAM -Gerforce 2 MX 64MB -Creative SB Live! 1024 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damage Inc 0 Posted January 6, 2002 At least someone has a worse computer than me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Knight 0 Posted January 6, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">hmm.. prepare yourselfs! (Warning, sensitive readers should stop reading here). My puter: Compaq Presario 5030 PII 300 (mmx!) 192mb RAM Voodoo3 3000 (PCI) Standard compaq keyboard Logitech iFeel mouse (runned on a Swedish military mousemat) I just love my old puter ( Â Â )<span id='postcolor'> What was your benchmark results? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charlie_McSheenie 1 Posted January 6, 2002 sweet, i just reformatted my hard drive to get rid of these pock marks things plauging my games. installed castle wolfenstein sp demo and then opf (with all the patches and all the add-ons i got) and i got a benchmark of 2995(!!!!). so having merely 2 games on my pc improved performance considerably Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bertiebasset 0 Posted January 6, 2002 Ok no laughing at the back CPU 500MHz Celeron 192 Meg of SDRAM Voodoo 4 Soundblaster live Benchmark result 874!! Oh the shame Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 6, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (nordin dk @ Jan. 06 2002,01:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1428 What does this number tell me?<span id='postcolor'> Absolutely didley-shit The 'benchmark'-numbers has nothing to do with real-life. My 'puter had over 2000 in WinXP and approx 1600 in WinME. OFP runs alot faster in WinME on my computer (P3,512mb,gf3,all scsi). I think it only calculates the performance by looking at the amount of ram, the amount of ram on your video-card and the amount of megahertz on the cpu... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hneel 0 Posted January 6, 2002 3099 Dual Athlon 1.4 gig 512 RAM Geforce 256 DDR Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charlie_McSheenie 1 Posted January 6, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (hneel @ Jan. 06 2002,16:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">3099 Dual Athlon 1.4 gig 512 RAM Geforce 256 DDR<span id='postcolor'> git dual 1.4's, damm, i feel so envious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xerxerc 0 Posted January 6, 2002 666 p2 no graphics card 64mb ram Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damage Inc 0 Posted January 6, 2002 No graphics card? I'm sure you have a graphics card or otherwise you wouldn't see anything on your screen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpaceAlex 0 Posted January 6, 2002 No graphic card, lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 6, 2002 1391 P3 850 896MB's PC133 RAm GF2MX I always thought that it was a CPU benchmark based upon your CPU alone? What to get first Athlon XP1500 or GF3 ti200? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xerxerc 0 Posted January 6, 2002 i thought the i740 video accelerator doesn't count cos it is very basic... lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damage Inc 0 Posted January 6, 2002 Isn't that of those crappy built-in graphics cards? You sure need a new one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bertiebasset 0 Posted January 6, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (xerxerc @ Jan. 06 2002,18:25)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">666 p2 no graphics card 64mb ram<span id='postcolor'> ok now i feel better Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snake1999 0 Posted January 6, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Black Knight @ Jan. 06 2002,16:02)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What was your benchmark results? <span id='postcolor'> 632 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo 29 Posted January 6, 2002 I get 9999999999, and yes I have edited my cfg file It's a meaningless benchmark after all, as are most benchmarks, either the game runs well or it doesn't if it doesn't find out why and resolve it, if it does then who cares about a number? Not me that's for sure Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Martin 0 Posted January 6, 2002 i have the best score i think Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fishu 0 Posted January 6, 2002 3571 AMD XP 1600+ (@1410mhz) Soltek SL75DRV2 512mb DDR Radeon 64mb VIVO SB Live! Win98 ..and less than a month ago it was mid 1400's, with celeron 566@850mhz. Neenies Martin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpaceAlex 0 Posted January 6, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Martin @ Jan. 06 2002,23:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">i have the best score i think<span id='postcolor'> I won't start with this, but i have the best sores. Anyway, scores aren not important. WinXP is giving me better scores than WinMe. I get 3800 in WinMe and 4038 in WinXP. OPf runs the same in both systems. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rogue2020 0 Posted January 7, 2002 3092 1.7Mhz GeForce 3 TI500 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Kong 0 Posted January 7, 2002 3251 Nvidia Geforce 3 640 mb ram P4 1800 mhz (was 1500 overclocked to 1800) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3DSHROOM 0 Posted January 7, 2002 1910 Athlon 900 384 MB SDRAM TNT2 Model 64 WinME Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Martin 0 Posted January 7, 2002 i still have the best score Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo 29 Posted January 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Martin @ Jan. 07 2002,14:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">i still have the best score<span id='postcolor'> No you don't See Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
