Guest Posted December 14, 2001 Also im thinking of these modifications are cababilities to shoot 2 guns from 1 unit (just poking in the dark) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 Why is it that everytime an OFP developer opens it's mouth some kind of weird alien talk comes out? And furthermore, they answer with questions, which is quite annoying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Erex 0 Posted December 14, 2001 What? I have answered on IGFs question I never do it again if you are so disappointed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fenna 0 Posted December 14, 2001 Erex why don't u tell us if any of those units will make there way into OFP in the near future (Edited by Fenna at 12:26 am on Dec. 15, 2001) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Erex on 12:21 am on Dec. 15, 2001 What? I have answered on IGFs question I never do it again if you are so disappointed. <span id='postcolor'> j/k...sheesh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 oh, j/k means just kidding...Just in case... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 It's just that it's funny to read this thing about VBS and then reading a reply from one of the OFP dev. and you start thinking "Yea! We're finally getting the answers!" And then you reply on another question. Happens all the time, but still looks funny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Erex 0 Posted December 14, 2001 Redstorm: Oki Im not so good in english so i dont get the point everytime Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 That's ok, I myself am from Holland and suck at English too :biggrin: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Op 0 Posted December 14, 2001 Redstorm stop bullying the developers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Erex 0 Posted December 14, 2001 My primary language is Czech:-) Second German and third Englis so im not so good in english. But stop to chat off-topic Wht you thikn about adding some TARAWA http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/lha-1.htm or WASP class http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/lhd-1.htm? I really pray for this. Of course with russian counterpart Ivan Rogov http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/rus/1174.htm or Kiev Class http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/rus/1143.htm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 What you wanna do? Ban me? HAHAHAHA!hahahaha..hahha...hah....d*amn, you really can ban me, can't you? :biggrin: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What? I have answered on IGFs question I never do it again if you are so disappointed.<span id='postcolor'> Sorry i have been away for awhile Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satchel 0 Posted December 14, 2001 Aw, cmon, are you just pulling our strings Erex? How about a functional LST (ramp up/down with possibility to carry vehicles), as the model is already in there. Would the helicopter/ VTOL carriers feature LCAC´s or work together ith the LST to bring troops ashore, or be just eyecandy and unfunctional like the LST? LCAC (Landing Craft, Air Cushion ) http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/lcac.htm Soviet counterpart: Project 1232.2 Zubr Pomornik class Amphibious landing craft <a href="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/rus/1232_2.htm <img" target="_blank">http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/rus/1232_2.htm <img</a> src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/rus/nk1232desant.jpg" border="0"> (Edited by Satchel at 2:09 am on Dec. 15, 2001) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 problem is that u cant just unload straight away of these things u need to put the ramp down and the crew needs to do stuff to unload the tank/vehicle, would u simulate this is in opflash? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satchel 0 Posted December 14, 2001 As a last resort, if simulating a functional hydraulic ramp is to difficult, it could be handled a similar way it´s like with the APC´s and IFV´s for now, there too is no ramp movement, but you can embark and disembark, the same way it should be possible for landing crafts, just implementing them for eyecandy doesn´t make much sense. (Edited by Satchel at 2:14 am on Dec. 15, 2001) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 14, 2001 yea, but then ppl will moan when u cant walk around inside them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Frag 0 Posted December 15, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Monkey Lib Front on 8:20 am on Dec. 15, 2001 yea, but then ppl will moan when u cant walk around inside them<span id='postcolor'> Well, that's a given with some people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satchel 0 Posted December 15, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Monkey Lib Front on 1:20 am on Dec. 15, 2001 yea, but then ppl will moan when u cant walk around inside them <span id='postcolor'> You would probably fall through the hull anyway when walking around inside it- becoming fishmeat, so i could  do without it. But without functionality more useless  ships are not appreciated, i would instead prefer further finetuning, bugfixes and other additions/ improvements that really affect gameplay.  (Edited by Satchel at 3:49 am on Dec. 15, 2001) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 15, 2001 the only way u is gonna play with these toys is to.... Join the USMC or your countries equiv Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vitoal125 0 Posted December 15, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Monkey Lib Front on 7:43 pm on Dec. 14, 2001 the only way u is gonna play with these toys is to.... Join the USMC or your countries equiv<span id='postcolor'> well goodie, I might get a look at them in a few more months. the countdown has begun, less then forty days to MCRD San Diego for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIN LADEN 0 Posted December 15, 2001 OK im gonna go be a US Marine =) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
silverdragon 0 Posted December 15, 2001 This vehicle is a AAVTP-7 standard marine landing armored transport vehicle (all amphivious capacity) launcher of the LPD Landing transport. Carry 20 marines and your armament is: a MG and a Grenade lancher in the commander turret, a a smoke lancher in the both side of the vehicle, and reactive armour. more notices of the front Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
silverdragon 0 Posted December 15, 2001 Oh sorry Wrote post Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
