quakergamer 0 Posted April 21, 2003 Hey all, I'm almost done with my T62 and I was wondering if anyone could tell me things I could make better,etc. Here are 2 pictures: More avaible at the OPGWC site (Click on the abnner found at my sig). Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pathfinder 0 Posted April 21, 2003 Looks very nice, if I may ask what engine sound will it use? T72 T55 or custom? Will it be amphibious like the pic shows? And also I know it's way late but your Humvees are cool and helped me out allot with making armed convoys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quakergamer 0 Posted April 21, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (pathfinder @ April 21 2003,18:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Looks very nice, if I may ask what engine sound will it use? T72 T55 or custom? Â Will it be amphibious like the pic shows? Â And also I know it's way late but your Humvees are cool and helped me out allot with making armed convoys. <span id='postcolor'> Probably custom sound and yes it will be amphibious if I manage to fix the bug :-/. Thanks for your comments Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stag 0 Posted April 21, 2003 The T62 isn't amphibious. I could cross rivers underwater by using a snorkeling kit, but you would need special models and scripting to implement that. Not that likely to need it in a desert anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-CCCP-Stalker 0 Posted April 21, 2003 The model and the textures looks unfinished... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianTerror 0 Posted April 21, 2003 I would say to release it if its "ready" and get the feedback from people who try it out. Then you'll really know what needs fixing up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExtracTioN 0 Posted April 21, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote ([CCCP]Stalker @ April 21 2003,18:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The model and the textures looks unfinished...<span id='postcolor'> It looks quite good only last touchings and than it should be finished Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianTerror 0 Posted April 22, 2003 If you want honesty, from looking at the pics...the textures look low rez, bland, and unfinished. Compare it to Sigma's Iraqi T-72 side by side to see what I mean. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quakergamer 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (CanadianTerror @ April 22 2003,06:02)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If you want honesty, from looking at the pics...the textures look low rez, bland, and unfinished. Compare it to Sigma's Iraqi T-72 side by side to see what I mean.<span id='postcolor'> Yea Ill post a pciuture and you'll see yourself Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johann "onn" Bitsoenn 0 Posted April 22, 2003 Comments?... 1. Who the f..k made it amphibious? 2. There was a T-62/64 pack mentioned in RSS forum, as a far project, hmm... maybe it would be better idea to wait for them? :] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted April 22, 2003 RSS forum? Anyway, why wait for someone else's tank? I don't quite see the logic of that.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rouge1 0 Posted April 22, 2003 I have one quesition how well does it face up to a Abrams? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quakergamer 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (rouge1 @ April 22 2003,20:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I have one quesition how well does it face up to a Abrams? <span id='postcolor'> Well T62 is older (much older) than an abrams anyway. And yes the T62 CAN BE AMPHIBIOUS. Tell me what you see on this picture http://www.ifrance.com/ArmyRec...._32.jpg Isnt it a T62 that is in the water Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johann "onn" Bitsoenn 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (quakergamer @ April 22 2003,22:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">And yes the T62 CAN BE AMPHIBIOUS. Tell me what you see on this picture http://www.ifrance.com/ArmyRec...._32.jpg Isnt it a T62 that is in the water <span id='postcolor'> That picture shows exactly that T-62 is NOT amphibious. And so - it must have some special preparations done (ie. all this long stuff over a turret) to cross the river driving on the bottom of it. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">RSS forum? Anyway, why wait for someone else's tank? I don't quite see the logic of that....<span id='postcolor'> Red Star Studios forum... http://www.ofprc.net/redstar....adid=33 Why to wait? Because it is better when proffessionals are doing some things. :] Proffessional = guy who will surely not make T-62 amphibious :] It is something like a choice... to make an OT-62 for my mod OR to wait till Marfy will finish his one. The other thing that makes it worth to wait - or at least to cooperate in some work - is that it is always better to have one T-62 pack instead of 10, each different. Look at the current situation with M109... we've got one your's, one SwissMod's, one Hawk's and one DKM's. Is it fun for addonusers? I'm shure, that not... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted April 22, 2003 OR you can wait for both ...seriously guys ur t62 looks great. Do not let us put u off doing it. There is still loads to do for us to release it so while time goes on ill be happy to ride urs around. T62 is NOT amphibious like all tanks. However LIKE some tanks it can cross over shallow waters (up to 4 meter i think but not sure) using special snorkle for the engine (othervise the exaust fumes won't be able to escape). Now this can be done with some clever scripting but what exactly are you going to cross with a t62 in OFP? To summarise: IT CANNOT SWIM, IT CAN RIDE OVER THE BOTTOM OF THE SHALLOW PARTS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stag 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (quakergamer @ April 22 2003,01:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (rouge1 @ April 22 2003,20:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I have one quesition how well does it face up to a Abrams? <span id='postcolor'> Well T62 is older (much older) than an abrams anyway. And yes the T62 CAN BE AMPHIBIOUS. Tell me what you see on this picture http://www.ifrance.com/ArmyRec...._32.jpg Isnt it a T62 that is in the water <span id='postcolor'> See my earlier post regarding schnorkelling kit. Amphibious= floats/swims. Not amphipious= sinks like a... Main Battle Tank, and crew drowns unless schnorkelling kit available. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johann "onn" Bitsoenn 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Soul_Assassin @ April 22 2003,23:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">OR you can wait for both ...seriously guys ur t62 looks great. Do not let us put u off doing it. There is still loads to do for us to release it so while time goes on ill be happy to ride urs around.<span id='postcolor'> I did not wanted to mean that I want one of the teams to abandon their project... I just mean, that it would be really better either to cooperate on it or... abandon one of the project - the less perispective one. Why? As I explained - nobody feels happy having multiple editions of the same addon... and now... we will have at least 2 T-62 packs, 3 MLRS packs, etc... Think about it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quakergamer 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Soul_Assassin @ April 22 2003,23:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">OR you can wait for both  ...seriously guys ur t62 looks great. Do not let us put u off doing it. There is still loads to do for us to release it so while time goes on ill be happy to ride urs around. T62 is NOT amphibious like all tanks. However LIKE some tanks it can cross over shallow waters (up to 4 meter i think but not sure) using special snorkle for the engine (othervise the exaust fumes won't be able to escape). Now this can be done with some clever scripting but what exactly are you going to cross with a t62 in OFP? To summarise: IT CANNOT SWIM, IT CAN RIDE OVER THE BOTTOM OF THE SHALLOW PARTS.<span id='postcolor'> Who knows we might use soem scripting . And we can wait for yours too but we got a T62 to finish for the OPGWCv1.0 coming soon. ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Milkman 1 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wardog @ April 21 2003,11:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> It can take over 8 hours to install the Snorkel Kit. Unless you have an action that speeds up the game until 8 hours pass when you enable the "snorkel" feature, it would be pretty unrealistic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianTerror 0 Posted April 22, 2003 Theres no prob having multiple addons(T-62's for example) up to a point. It's when you have 15 different M-16's that it's a problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quakergamer 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Sgt. Milkman @ April 22 2003,23:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wardog @ April 21 2003,11:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> It can take over 8 hours to install the Snorkel Kit. Unless you have an action that speeds up the game until 8 hours pass when you enable the "snorkel" feature, it would be pretty unrealistic.<span id='postcolor'> Great then NO snorkel kit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JJonth Cheeky Monkey 1 Posted April 22, 2003 Do one already prepared with a snorkel kit an one without then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stag 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (quakergamer @ April 22 2003,03:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Sgt. Milkman @ April 22 2003,23:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wardog @ April 21 2003,11:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> It can take over 8 hours to install the Snorkel Kit. Unless you have an action that speeds up the game until 8 hours pass when you enable the "snorkel" feature, it would be pretty unrealistic.<span id='postcolor'> Great then NO snorkel kit<span id='postcolor'> Did I say that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (cheeky monkey @ April 23 2003,00:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Do one already prepared with a snorkel kit an one without then <span id='postcolor'> Yes that maybe a better idea Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quakergamer 0 Posted April 22, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wardog @ April 23 2003,00:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (quakergamer @ April 22 2003,03:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Sgt. Milkman @ April 22 2003,23:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wardog @ April 21 2003,11:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> It can take over 8 hours to install the Snorkel Kit. Unless you have an action that speeds up the game until 8 hours pass when you enable the "snorkel" feature, it would be pretty unrealistic.<span id='postcolor'> Great then NO snorkel kit<span id='postcolor'> Did I say that?<span id='postcolor'> No but you guys want a realistic add-on right ? Unless you want me to put it for 7 hours ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
