Rather unethical warfare

[scrim 1]

And any of this is relevant to the thread because?

[NeuroFunker 11]

i think he though, thread names was unEthnical warfare, so no real nation countries, rather just opfor/bluefor.

Edited December 26, 2012 by NeuroFunker

[ProfTournesol 956]

And any of this is relevant to the thread because?

Because of nothing. This isn't the place for politics.

[mrbenis 10]

I personally support anything that helps to convey a more balanced approach to warfare.

For example Spec Ops the Line; you fire white phosphorus rounds onto civilians, killing them all. A great juxtaposition on the intent of the soldiers, who only wanted to get through that area without being annihilated.

ARMA 3's single player campaign could benefit from this. I'm not saying to have some overarching cheesy message that war is evul or anything, but at least make people see some accountability for fighting in an area with a civilian population. Effectively.. causing 0 civvy deaths should be only for very skilled players. The average player won't be a certifiable war criminal by the end of the game, but they will be staring down court martial.