scrim

Apaches, not F-22s. Somewhat doubt they'd have sent F-22s there between '06-'08, when that thing happened, for several reasons.

Re the current government in Ukraine: Though not democratically elected, it is a legitimate one. It is an interim government, approved by the democratically elected Ukrainian parliament, to head the country until it can be replaced by a democratically elected government. I.e. a whole lot more democratic than e.g. the "government" in Crimea, that consists mostly of people who had gotten the notion that they could fire democratically elected politicians, take their places, and call themselves democratic.

You understand what he's written? Seriously, what is "zakonnoizbrannogo"? Pro tip exe, if you have to use Google translate, don't bother.

But but but... Kiev = nazis? :rolleyes:

What's wrong with you? Poking and kicking the bear? How? Is that when the Ukrainians wanted a leader respecting their will and democracy? Or is it the more common notion, that NATO has done something wrong by allowing former WP states to join? In case you didn't notice, they joined NATO out of their own free will, to avoid being subjected to exactly what Russia is doing to Georgia and Ukraine now. Don't lie. You blame the West for the deaths that would occurr should the legal Ukrainian government attempt to retake control of its own country. You are definitely supporting Putin.

Please travel to Warsaw, and tell the people of that city that the Home Army, which the Russians allowed the Nazis to destroy along with the city, was Communist. I dare you. And for the record, yes, they are Russians. Committing treason doesn't change your ethnicity.

If it's "let's quote the worst source on the Internet" day, let's go ahead and look up "Fascism": Ring a bell with the Putin worshipers?

Pretty sure they'd build a wall against Russia regarding Muslim extremists. See, here in the West, there's a smaller number of them demanding this and that. Then there's Chechnya, a Russian republic. In Chechnya, Sharia law is definitely in place, and the current Chechnyan president openly defends honour killings.

So we're right back to Cold War rethorics, where essentially anything coming from the East is completely detached from reality. Also, did Putin mention when the Chechnyans would get to vote in a referendum about becoming an independent state and joining Saudi Arabia, because that's totally how laws and the world works according to Putin?

So the checklist for attacking checkpoints according to Svoboda is apparently: 1, US dollars, for the checkpoint gift shop 2, Party business card, in case the survivors are interested in voting for them 3, Guns (optional) Why do I have a hard time believing the Russian account of what occurred? :rolleyes:

Well, I was referring to the forums. Last time I checked, none of the users who keep linking propaganda "news" like it's cool had access to ICBMs. :p

You're just writing random words at this point, aren't you?

Let me get this straight: When Assad everything short of actually nukes his population, and goes so far that even Russia and China agree that he doesn't deserve WMD privileges any longer, and has killed over a hundred thousand civilians, the West are aggressive when they contemplate imposing a no fly zone over parts of Syria after maybe 2 years of civil war. But when parts of an interim government in Ukraine ponders the possibility of no longer recognizing Russian as an official language, it's so totally proportionate to in less than a month invade and annex the country?

They're not amphibious AFAIK IRL. These are though ;)

If you actually believe this, I pity you.