Ahh here we go

[elendil004 0]

since west is getting all these new big boys, what about

http://www.aviation.ru/Tu/95/Tu-95M.jpg.html

but seriously, i'd love to see

<img src="http://airstrikeonline.tripod.com/images/sm11.jpg">

if that doesn't work,

http://airstrikeonline.tripod.com/images/sm11.jpg

[EveronVetsAgainstTheWar 1]

Why

[Jester983 0]

What time frame is that plane from?

[USSoldier11B 0]

most definitely like to see that in OFP.........so I can shoot the flying trashcan down.

[Scorpio 0]

Marss911 is making it.

[cam0flage 0]

Russians are the absolute masters of designing ugly aircraft ... But hey, they are effective, i guess.

// cam0flage

[Legionnaire 7 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (cam0flage @ June 30 2002,15:06)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Russians are the absolute masters of designing ugly aircraft ... But hey, they are effective, i guess.

// cam0flage<span id='postcolor'>

Oh man, what are you talkin about, she's beautiful!!

[cbfasi 4]

Well I think the Tu95 is a great looking plane, but even worse look for how long the Russins used this type of plane (didn't it used to be known as the Tu-16 Badger??)

[RedStorm 0]

It looks a lot like the X-36 (?) if you ask me!

[elendil004 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (residuum @ June 30 2002,08:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Why<span id='postcolor'>

why not?

[habdoel 0]

the tu-95 also know as Bear was still in service in the 80's as a oversea spy splane to look after the nato fleet. I think it is the most beautifull bomber/spy plane ever. the different between the badger and the bear is that the bear is a propeller aircraft (she is still fast), and the badger has jet engines(or how do you call that?)

[cbfasi 4]

This is giving me an idea.

Mission, small Speciall Forces raid to take out Bears before they take off to intercept a CVBG, now that would be interesting..