WebDog 0 Posted November 19, 2001 I have heard of a tank class challenger or somthing like that. It can whip a T-80 pretty quick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aaron Kane 0 Posted November 19, 2001 The Challenger is the main British tank. I think its also one of the most heavily armored IRL, and its gun packs one #### of a punch also. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hasha 2 Posted November 20, 2001 T-95 kick its mama! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aaron Kane 0 Posted November 20, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Hasharajima on 2:36 am on Nov. 20, 2001 T-95 kick its mama!<span id='postcolor'> Dude, the Challenger's mom died in labor! Show some respect! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intruder 0 Posted November 20, 2001 Challenger Rules :biggrin: ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Blind Sniper 0 Posted November 20, 2001 T-95? My hovertank can beat that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Havelock 0 Posted November 20, 2001 Challanger 2 has the best armour of any Western production tank, a gun control system based on an upgraded version of the Abrams's system, and a rather nice gun. Its immediate ancestor, the Challanger 1, was a tad reliability-problem prone but the new version seems to have fixed that. As long as stupid cost-cutting measures are not implemented. During the recent exercises in Oman the MoD tried to save money by not properly preparing the vehicles for the desert. (Sand Filters, etc). Result: a significant proportion of engines damaged within 48 hours. Bloody typical, as my grandmother would say. -- Currently reading - The Crow Road - Iain Banks Currently listening - Is That It - The Strokes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bertiebasset 0 Posted November 20, 2001 Talking of british units along with the SA80 id like to see the challengers predecessor the Chieftain and the Scimitar Light scout tank included. (Edited by bertiebasset at 8:39 pm on Nov. 20, 2001) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gilroyg2001 0 Posted November 20, 2001 Hwy, you forgot the warrior APC, now thats a good APC, wayyy better in my view than a M113, the english army rule! (As you can probably tell I'm from England) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACT SMILEY 0 Posted November 20, 2001 Is it me or do we start with unreliable but quality stuff for the army and then make it into the best in the world later? Now the airforce, thats the best stuff from the start Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Jub-Jub Bird 1 Posted November 20, 2001 I think thats because they are crazy ideas in the first place, nothing bog standard, must be the best and most powerful and gonna whoop you ass! As a result we tend to go a little to far and over do them resulting in mass failure all round. But hey once they finished do we get rather lovely kit!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Havelock 0 Posted November 20, 2001 Without wishing to raise anyone's hackles, I think the British Army is a tad more accurate than the English Army (unless you want some of the more scary Highland regiments on the other side). The strength of the British Army (and its armed forces in general) is not in its equipment (which tends to be average/good, with occasional bloopers and brilliants) but in the superb training of its fighting men (and women of course) -- Currently reading - The Crow Road - Iain Banks Currently listening - the news Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Jub-Jub Bird 1 Posted November 20, 2001 Well it is the excellently trained (some say best) service men that put up with the kit and inprevise when something goes wrong with the kit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chernaya Akula 0 Posted November 20, 2001 The Black Eagle kick Challenger ass.... This is a MBT.. (Edited by Spetznaz at 11:52 pm on Nov. 20, 2001) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krull SGC 0 Posted November 20, 2001 The folks who designed that tank (a T-80UM2 I believe) watch way too much Star Trek, look at the turret, Federation starship anybody?!?!?!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chernaya Akula 0 Posted November 20, 2001 His name is Black Eagle, and anyone know too much about this tank first because I think that he still a test tank, and secont becuse the Russians don't give no information about him,, I just know that he 'll rules the combat zone... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murphywnjuk 0 Posted November 20, 2001 finally, a group of people who are interested in BRITISH (not ENGLISH) units!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
m79 0 Posted November 20, 2001 the Challanger WITHDREW from NATO tank trials because it kept coming last. Great tank , fit in well to OPF Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACT SMILEY 0 Posted November 21, 2001 M79 - probably because it stopped working. Typical British stuff, always great always breaking down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Jub-Jub Bird 1 Posted November 21, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from ACT SMILEY on 8:58 pm on Nov. 21, 2001 M79 - probably because it stopped working. Typical British stuff, always great always breaking down.<span id='postcolor'> And yet still has what is considered to be the best army world-over, crazy that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aaron Kane 0 Posted November 21, 2001 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Spetznaz on 12:17 am on Nov. 21, 2001 His name is Black Eagle, and anyone know too much about this tank first because I think that he still a test tank, and secont becuse the Russians don't give no information about him,, I just know that he 'll rules the combat zone... <span id='postcolor'> Oh? Lets see how tough it is when a NATO FCS (They're bound to give it an offical name someday ) nails it from 10km away Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Blind Sniper 0 Posted November 22, 2001 Russian & American tanks have a history of sucking Russian tanks have usually been quite relable, but underarmed & underarmored Abrams is the first good idea the yanks have had British tanks such as the Centurion & the Chieftan ruled the 50s-70s I think the challenger is one of the world's best existing tanks... would be a good addition to OFP I understand why the Abrams and T80 are an "almost" equal match in OFP, for gameplay.. but lets look at it realistically.. I think the kill ratio between the 2 would be 5-1, if that. Driving the Abrams would be like having god mode on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites