Warin 0 Posted June 4, 2002 I was perusing fas.org and came across this. Scroll down to the bottom of the page and download: Fundamentals -- The HH-60G Helicopter. I did not link to the file directly as it's 12.9mb This handbook provides HH-60G crew members a comprehensive document containing fundamental employment procedures and techniques that may be used to accomplish the various missions of the HH-60G. This handbook is the primary HH-60G fundamentals reference document for Air Combat Command (ACC), Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC), Air National Guard (ANG), and Air Education and Training Command (AETC). Designed to be used in conjunction with MCM 3-1 (S) and AFI/MCI 11-series directives, this handbook addresses basic flying tasks and planning considerations for combat search and rescue. Although the techniques and procedures contained in this volume are not regulatory, they have been tested and proven to be safe and effective. How cool is that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted June 5, 2002 Are they insane? They really havn't got a clue of operational security. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Warin 0 Posted June 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ June 05 2002,03:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Are they insane? They really havn't got a clue of operational security.<span id='postcolor'> In defense of the American government, the document is dated 1997... so for all we know it's been superceded by something else so there is no harm in releasing it. That site is a wealth of information and it seems pretty neutral. I wonder how accurate it is.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted June 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ June 05 2002,03:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ June 05 2002,031)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Are they insane? They really havn't got a clue of operational security.<span id='postcolor'> In defense of the American government, the document is dated 1997... so for all we know it's been superceded by something else so there is no harm in releasing it. That site is a wealth of information and it seems pretty neutral. Â I wonder how accurate it is....<span id='postcolor'> One thing is saying how fast a tank is. A completely different thing is to publish maneuvers of how to avoid AAA fire! This could be directly used against US troops today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indychuck 0 Posted June 5, 2002 Well, denoir I'd imagine this information would've been available through other means for a long time. The biggest problem is not knowing the information but actually putting it to use. Plus the things the US and Western forces have on their side is money. It doesn't much matter if your enemy knows how to avoid AAA fire if you can just use Anti-Air missiles like the Sidewinder from our thousands of 20+ million dollar planes as if they were growing on trees. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aaron Kane 0 Posted June 5, 2002 Denoir's right! Â I just shot down a Cobra right outside my house! Â EDIT: But Denoir does make a valid point... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted June 5, 2002 No, what I was talking about are the evasive patterns for the blackhawk that are deifined. Very easy to put to use. You open fire on the chopper and can predict how they will turn since they are following standard procedures. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indychuck 0 Posted June 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 05 2002,03:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Denoir's right! Â I just shot down a Cobra right outside my house! Â EDIT: Â But Denoir does make a valid point...<span id='postcolor'> Ah you must be a member of the NRA Denoir does make a point but I am certain evasive maneuvers have been updated. Given US tactics, if they do the job right there won't be any AAA to fire. It's one of the first targets they go after Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphwiggum 6 Posted June 5, 2002 probab;y the updated their techniques. if not let's contact some authorities. anybodu have number for taliban? I thought it was 1-800-TALIBAN. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Antichrist 0 Posted June 5, 2002 Its 0800 Ben Laden..... hmm.... I wonder what new car to buy with the money they give me..... Dodge Venom 800 will do nicely Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
