The m2....

[Spy17 1]

Well it is hard to tell from the distance (nice improved viewdistance here) but it looks like the russians in Resistance will still be equiped with the american M2...

Is it so difficult to give it a new model BIS?

[LordZach 0]

damn...well it is just a beta pic, we can hope

[USSoldier11B 0]

An M2 with a scopelike reticle. Oh the damage we will be able to do...

[Antichrist 0]

Oh well! Shit happens, I guess!

[LordZach 0]

i wonder how many people have gotten seizures from firing that thing for awhile while zoomed in full as unrealistic as it is i kind of like it, otherwise they wouldn't really be that much of a threat

is it really so hard to just change the gun?

i find myself more and more changing the ruskee m2 loadout to a 7.62 or GFX707's bunker MG because the M2 doesn't really seem to deadly. getting a dozen bullets impacting around you every second is fun more intense...ahh please BIS be good boys and stuff...

[SFG 1]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (LordZach @ May 14 2002,13:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">i wonder how many people have gotten seizures from firing that thing for awhile while zoomed in full  <span id='postcolor'>

LOL! i look away, if you do it at night looks like someones robbing your house all the walls light up like lightning.

[Snoopy 0]

lol i have bad graphics so the flash doesnt even show up but it saves my life and medical fees

[Grey Fox 0]

Shouldn't the Russians have the 12.7mm (.50cal) DSHK?

[SKULLS_Viper 0]

Man, i hate that constant flashing on the M2.Gives me a BAD headach.

[Seifer 0]

Russians have 12.7 and 14.5 mm machinguns......

But BIS and Codemasters AGAIN kiss USA to ass...

[LordZach 0]

umm how are they kissing the USA's ass by not making a russian fixed MG?

last time i checked they had BMPs not M113s, T-72s not M-60s, T-80s not M1-A1s, AK-74s not M-16s, PKs not M-60s, shilkas not M163s, SU-25s not A-10s, "boat"s not PBRs, MI-17s not UH-60s, MI-24s not AH-1s, RPGs not LAWs, etc

[Seifer 0]

OK

WHERE BALANCE

Kiowa - (russian - KA-25)

Chinook - (russian MI-26)

AH-64 - (russian MI-28)

BRDM-2 have 14.5 and 7.62 machingun - WHERE

T-80 have 125 mm gun, in game 120 mm...

Russian 12.7 - http://world.guns.ru/machine/mg02-r.htm

And - http://world.guns.ru/machine/mg24-r.htm

5t Truck open - lazy to make Ural Open ?

[dayglow 2]

Still how is BIS kissing American ass by having a common mounted HMG. It doesn't effect me and my gameplay. How different is a 12 or 14mm HMG in appearance anyways? Is it a box with a long pole sticking out of one end? I'd rather they fix the way it is mounted. I rather see a tripod HMG (but I believe that is not possible. The HMG is treated like a vehicle in the game so I can live with that)

I love how if a game has more equipment from one side then the developers are doing something wrong. Look at LOMAC and see how many people whine that they have more Russian planes than US. You just can't satify the masses I guess.

COLINMAN

[LordZach 0]

war is not balanced

you want balance, yet a 125mm gun on the T-80 isn't very balanced since the M1A1 has a 120mm now is it?

if you hate America so much that you can't accept a American machine gun on the Russian side, go mod some yourself. no need to throw a fit.

[Seifer 0]

I'm not hate USA ?but i want BALANCED game !!!

T-80..T-80 have active defence system "ARENA" + guidet missiles in real, they not need in game ,BUT i want BALANCE !!!

Sorry my English..

[LordZach 0]

OFP is about realism first, balance second.

[Seifer 0]

OK

T-80

Where "arena" + Guidet missiles

Now. Resistance

New weapon and venicles to Russian ?

Never - only for NATO....

[LordZach 0]

i don't know about you but i haven't seen any mention/screenshots of NATO vehicles in resistance

[Seifer 0]

i don't know about you but i haven't seen any mention/screenshots of Russian new vehicles in resistance  

[SpaceAlex 0]

You're starting to annoy me Seifer. You're probably just one more crazy kid who thinks he's smart. WTF do u want. I really don't care about the fricking M2, T80 guided missles and other unimportnat stuffs.

Damn.You're posts are just sooooooooo annoying. They really are.

Maaammmmi, maaaammiiiii give me more. I need more. I need 100 galons of milk not 60.

[LordZach 0]

and what kind of vehicles do you have in mind?

let's see

they have 2 tanks, 2 apcs, 1 truck, 1 car, 3 support vehicles, 2 choppers, 1 plane, a recon vehicle, an AA system. perhaps you could give us the names of some vehicles you would like to see?

[USSoldier11B 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Russians have 12.7 and 14.5 mm machinguns......

But BIS and Codemasters AGAIN kiss USA to ass... <span id='postcolor'>

This is because we have all the $$$.

I'm sure the are many more Americans who have the capabilty to afford to play OFP than there are Russians. Just relax, you will get your new Russian units. That's what Oxygen is for.

[Seifer 0]

BTR-80 http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/btr-80.htm

BMP-3 http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/bmp-3.htm

REAL BRDM-2 http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/brdm-2.htm

balance

NATO AH-64 - Russian Mi-28 http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/mi-28.htm

NATO Chinook - Russian Mi-26 http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/mi-26.htm

NATO Kiowa - Russian Ka-25 http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/ka-25.htm

2 USSoldier11B

All what need for BIS and Codemasters - Money....And this money in USA...It's fact...

[LordZach 0]

let me try to explain this to you again

resistance is about russians, not nato vehicles.

you were talking about balance.  the BRDM was to balance out the nato humvee, how would adding a MG to it balance the game?

have you done your reading on those pages?  </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The BMP-3, first seen in public during a parade in Moscow in 1990<span id='postcolor'> why would they put that in a game based BEFORE 1985?

the BMP-2 is superior to the BTR-80 by the looks of it, why would you want that in there?  

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The Mi-28N is based on the Mi-28A, a daylight helicopter first flown in December 1982<span id='postcolor'> again, i don't think that fits in with the timeline too much for an official campaign do you?

MI-26 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Date of Introduction 1983 <span id='postcolor'> enough said

why would you want a KA-25?  ASW means anti submarine warfare, i don't see any submarines in OFP or resistance, are you going to launch some nuclear torpedos against those dirty PBRs?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Sensors A: Dipping sonar; 3 sonobuoys, MAD, Mushroom radar, EO sensor estimated to be FLIR.

B: Big Bulge radar, ESM data link <span id='postcolor'> sounds like a real nice recon chopper to me.

[SpaceAlex 0]

They inplanted new vehicles for Americans because we request them. They were not avaible in version 1.0. We have an Apche because we need it, we have chinook because we wanted it, we have kiowa because we wanted it. Got that. Americans were outnumbered in version 1.0. They were even without AA gun. They needed those stuffs. Russians do not need that. Hind is enough powerful, they have enough tanks, enough guns and everything. They don't need more.