Koni 3 Posted October 11, 2010 In the middle of making a mission that will most probably be the first I ever realese for people to play. Basic question is, how do you like a mission to play through. 1: Do you prefer that all the mission objectives have to be completed\succeeded in order to carry on the mission, and have to reload if you fail an objective and try again. 2: Mission objectives are not as important so the story will continue onto the next objectives, even if you have failed the previous ones, so it's more like playing through the mission and not having to beat it. 3: Many objectives can be failed but mission will become harder if they are, with a couple of objectives that will be an END if failed, like having to keep someone alive from point A to point B, and if they die then the mission ends. I'd say option 3 is my favorite, but what do the rest of you think ? :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Birdy890 0 Posted October 15, 2010 I prefer option 3. and may I ask what the mission is about? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vinc3nt 10 Posted October 15, 2010 Option 3 for me :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trapper 0 Posted October 15, 2010 2 Reminds me of the old OFP campaign when you where just a soldier of many and not savior of the world. As long as you survived your life continued. Though the campaign stored penalty scores IIRC and sooner or later the CO could dismiss you and end the campaign early. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Koni 3 Posted October 17, 2010 I prefer option 3.and may I ask what the mission is about? The Missions based loosley on the Ethnic Cleansing atrocities of the Serbian\Croatian war of the 1990's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites