Peter5on

When on prone rolling with Q and E is to fast! :D I lay down myself without weapon and backpack and try to do it as fast as i can. There is no chance of me to do it as quickly as in Arma. Some patches ago there was normal speed but now its UNREALISTIC!!! Its military sim or call of duty?

When on prone, rolling speed with Q or E is to fast!, unrealistic etc. Its change with 1.18 patch or i dont remember but its not Call of Duty right?

Newest nvidia drivers (337.88) gives me 4 FPS!!! Normaly i have 38 FPS at my testing spot (4.2ghz) now i have 42 FPS and before patch i had 44FPS with 4,9ghz OC. FX-8350 + GTX660

If u have AMD processor u do wrong decision, i will never again buy any amd component. I have FX 8350 and overclocking your processor is the only thing to match up with intel processors (stock speeds), so 100mhz more will give u about 1 FPS more. Use 1,5 volts on FX 8350 and set it to 4,9ghz it works with me. Bohemia should announced that AMD processors are unable to run Arma properly and u should change your processor immediately.

I have one core around 90% and the other three are around 50% almost all time. Gpu is around 40-70% So i think its not going to be better, only thing we could do is to wait for Broadwell processors. So i think Devs should change Arma 3 system requirements to: -Only Intel i7 4770K and OC to 4.5ghz otherwise stay away. -U have AMD processor... WRONG stay away. Is Arma going to be 64bit like Day Z?

Gamer: "Hey Arma u walking insted of running whats up?" Arma: "i need more power, i need more CPU power, iem so tired, iem so old (Real Virtuality Engine) Gamer: "ok ok, here it is i OC my cpu to 6ghz fine?" Arma: "nahh, no i change my mind i need to rest lets stay as it is" Its sad becouse every year cpu power rise about 10% so we need to wait about 5-10 years to have constant 60 fps? What kind of power we need? And maybe they going to relase Arma 4 of course with the same archaic engine and yes on 32 bits... Its 2014!!! There is no hope...

I have FX 8350 and moving from stock speeds 4.2 to 4.9 give me 7 FPS Normaly in multiplayer CTI 25vs25 players i have 30FPS of course ultra settings, fxaa ultra, distance 2800/1300/155 1680/1050 in heavy fight drop down to 25 in stock speeds even to 20 fps. GtX660 SSD vertex4 256 8gb ram 1600

Here comes the truth, last server optimalizations do nothing i mean nothing change for me, its not better not worst. That bullshit commands is only placebo... What can change fps and strange stutter when even almost empty ssd load "somthing" and we have little freeze in multiplayer is: I turn off all power saving and turbo modes in bios and oc my fx8350 to 4.9ghz that helps me to have steady 30 fps and more in cities on CTI server 25vs25 players. Ultra settings gtx 660 I do test leaving only one core active on 1400 mhz and its still playable ~17fps ultra settings in editor altis ;) My friend have gtx titan and i7-4930K and have the same FPS in multiplayer EUTW CTI 25vs25 But its still very strange engine for me... They should push render to gpu and other things to cpu. Why push everything to cpu and do "strange" optimization for that component? The good thing is there is no lags in servers so i think everybody have somthing like 30fps but everything is perfectly synced bullets and all other things. My rig fx8350 4,9mhz, gtx 660, ssd vertex 4 256gb, 8gb ram 1600mhz