Fap

^ this x100 kju also mentioned the thing that bothers me the most, after AI reloads, the first shot afterwards is with aimbot precision. Fix it. Just fix it. Play your damn game and realize these things yourselves. These are so obvious. I wanted to make a list of stuff that's broken, from the top of my head I could fill up 2 or 3 pages. With size 3 font.

Please, please, the only thing you should do, in my opinion, is release the climbing addon - this is amazing! Combined with the JumpMF addon we actually have quite some possibilities in movement now! But, imo, how do you have fatigue working with it? I'd expect to be out of breath when climbing up one of these walls with a full inventory.. 2 thumbs up, can't wait

Hahahaha, awesome missions! http://i.imgur.com/doAMw1x.jpg (225 kB) :edit: Also we just did the co12_operation_wof one (I think it's called) - the hostages were bugged, we couldn't complete the objective

I haven't bothered reading any of the comments except the ones that get sent around because they're so stupid it hurts, like, and I quote: "it's an absolute insult to me as an Arma fan" The autism in that comment makes me want to wear a fedora and play with My Little Ponies. Seriously. ArmA 3 is a huge step down from ArmA 2 when you look at the bigger picture. From what pops into my mind when I think of ArmA 3, the only thing it offers over A2, is that you no longer sometimes die when you lie down next to/on a rock, some half decent ragdolls (still shit tons of bugs with it), some half-assed physics (vehicles not being able to flip, wtf is up with that?) and the graphics are quite an okay improvement. These are the few things that actually spring to mind. There might be more that ArmA 3 improved on, but it's nothing I remember, so it can't be that great. I still prefer ArmA 2, it actually has content worth playing with. /end rant :edit: Not quite end of the rant. I remember tears of joy hitting my cheeks when I heard ArmA 3 was in the works. I saw gameplay videos, all the promises they made for the game, all the showcase videos, all of it. I actually thought it would be an improvement so far above ArmA 2, but instead they let all the promises be forgotten, skimp on everything and shit on the long time players. I understand that money is a big factor, but making a game so mainstream that you can't have interiors for vehicles, broken recoil, a huge lack of content and that the only thing you have to show off in terms of gameplay is a mod that most people refer to as "Waste of time land", I kind of feel betrayed, you made promises and you didn't keep them. I still bought your game though, and I'll still probably play it. But I'll be thinking "meh, this is not what I paid for" when I play it. /final end rant

no need to spread hate, but i still give up *no offense meant to anyone*

We should all care about each other, but when a game that's previously only focused on military simulating, starts going over to the arcadey, fast paced and impatient type of game at it's CORE, we all worry. No one wants a "Call of Battlefield". We want ARMA, not some shitty mix between arcade unrealistic shooter. Which I might add BF already does perfectly fine. Why are you people trying to ruin the only franchise that lets people immerse themselves into some realistic action? I don't effing care what you think the game should be, neither should BIS. They need to stick to their roots. If you want to play "Domination" or "Wasteland", fine, go ahead, but don't fucking try to change an entire game to cater for a pathetic public server mission, that is already being done twice better in Battlefield.

I am off to play Counter Strike: Global Offensive, where there isn't much "balancing" going on, and each team has different weapons that do different things, yet it all depends on skill. I am confused why BIS thinks it's acceptable to "BALANCE" a MILITARY SIMULATOR . Need we really remind them what genre it is they're making a game for? Really? Catering for the masses... sad.

All I can, and want to say, is this... Is ArmA not a military simulator? Did it not strive for realism in the past? Why is it turning into an unrealistic first person shooter, catering for the masses and the money? I am disgusted, truly. The direction this is going we might aswell call it "Duty Calls 2".

Motivation for devs: "ArmA3 claims to be all about streamlining the gameplay mechanics but they seem to have stopped at animation fluidity." "Fighting the scroll menu to open only one of 3 nearby doors is not good design. It's like a not so fun guessing game. 3 doors in the list, hmm... I wonder which one I should choose to open the door I want to go through" Gorbachev is spot on. To sum it all up (except a little piece of the first post, I think): Recoil is fucked up completely Scroll Menu/Weapon Swapping/Satchel Placing/Opening Doors - all of this is fucked up too "space = the universal use/open key" - "We have too many keys that do the same thing anyways." - "Also there should be completely different control schemes in all the different types of vehicles" - "the "Use Optics/Sights" key is not the same in vehicles as it is for infantry by default. This is mind boggling. Also, holding the right mouse button is not consistently zoom in every vehicle. Sometimes you just tap it to zoom, others you hold it and vice versa for vehicle optics. This level of inconsistency screams "bad design" to me." "I honestly cannot believe that Primary, Secondary, Launcher and Satchel/Mine do not have number keys set for them. 1 = Rifle 2 = Pistol 3 = Launcher 4 = Satchel/IED 5 = Mine Why the hell do we need to scroll wheel and select, it's so bloody clunky. Also 100% agree on a shortcut key for opening doors or climbing ladders! You should be able to press a single key and when your player is close enough he will move into the animation." "Ever seen a guy stop in the middle of line of fire to pull out a pistol because he's out of ammo? Nah, neither have i. Not being able to move while swapping weapons is stupid, ok maybe it should limit your speed, but being locked in position... just no." Shooting up/down in a 90 degree angle is impossible. Needs a fix. 90 degrees is the minimum, anything else would be unrealistically restrictive.

It doesn't really matter if it's the simplest. All it takes is a 1 minute bootcamp to teach people. And tbh, it already has a learning curve, changing this would only make it slightly easier. :edit: The developers wouldn't break the game by adding community requested features.. I trust they know what they are doing. Don't you? :)

[off topic] I like you. [/off topic] Anyways I feel like I should copy paste all of my ideas into a single post so it's easier to keep track of.. or a link to some google doc so I can edit it freely, that's allowed right?

The funny thing is, ArmA 3 is the game where the recoil system turned bad. ArmA 2 was quite ok. Oh, that's a perfect example.. Yeah, it needs to be: AIM at door and press SPACE to open, short animation where either one hand goes towards handle to simulate the entire door opening thing (it would be nice if it didn't lock your movement, so you could sort of "fast walk" through the door, action wins)

Actually thought about it abit, and came up with something.. Mousewheel is for stance swapping, current way is clunky as hell. Ctrl+Mousewheel is for swapping weapons, tiny menu appears on screen to indicate "Main/Secondary/Tertiary(rockets or whatever)" The menu needs to have a key that's NOT spacebar (since that will be for Ladders/Doors/general Use), nor the mousewheel. I don't really care which one it'll be :P But all the changes mentioned in this thread would really improve gameplay. I hope devs see some of this :/

I haven't played much multiplayer, sounds horrible though :( Thank you for reminding me of this though! SHOOTING UP in a 90 degree angle is impossible. The fuck is this? I can bend backwards more than 90 degrees and still shoot a handgun effectively in real life, this needs to be fixed. (don't say "But wearing armor constraints you!" - No. It happens for naked players aswell, invalid argument. Imagine if someone is straight above you on a ledge or something and the game doesn't let you shoot him because apparently your spine is made of hardened steel with soldered joints :( Shooting down in a 90 degree angle is also impossible (from what i've tested in singleplayer) - this is stupid aswell, i can shoot inbetween my legs bending over quite easily.. Not saying this should be implemented, but not being able to shoot 90 degrees is.... well.... just no.

Shit mice? What do you mean? Are you saying the Razer Naga is a shitty mouse? Why is it shitty? The amount of times I change weapons shouldn't be a factor in whether or not the way the system I do it with sucks ass. Please, just get out of this thread with that attitude, we don't need angry teenagers flaming. If you can keep it constructive, I welcome you. I never said I wanted "Insto Rambo Blamo". I just said the way it currently is, is impossibly stupid. No one is that slow... Dropping your assault rifle when hanging on a strap to pull your pistol out shouldn't take very long. I could approve of the slow times if you could actually effing move while doing so, like, in the real world? Ever seen a guy stop in the middle of line of fire to pull out a pistol because he's out of ammo? Nah, neither have i. Not being able to move while swapping weapons is stupid, ok maybe it should limit your speed, but being locked in position... just no. Sigh, you goddamn trolls. Please just take your fucking shitty garbage attitude out of here and come back when you've grown up and can keep it constructive. 0/10 - all of you. Bad trolls. Says the troll. Nice.