Naka

No, if you read my initial post I said that in cherno I get about what you get, 30FPS.

If you're talking to me, I already posted these results. Benchmark: ~100FPS Benchmark1: ~89-98FPS (98FPS after trying every combination of optimization advice) Benchmark2: ~20FPS. Can't be arsed running this all the way. I overclocked my processor up 600MHz (800MHz when it needs to, but apparently it never needs to on ArmA), I did Benchmark1 again and got 95FPS. No difference, cores as always aren't maxed.

Yeah, no, ArmaII is actively four cores, two of them under half used and two of them ~2/3 used. They aren't maxed at all. Mods such as GDT mod grass, PVT, sap_clutter don't have any performance gain.

AMD FX 8150 (8 cores 3.8GHZ) ATI 6970 Windows 7 and XP (two different PCs with the exact same hardware) 8Gigs DDR3 1600MHZ ram, nowhere near the maximum used Arma2 and OA both on an SSD Everything on lowest settings There are no bottlenecks. GPU usage ~20-30%, each core on the CPU doesn't pass 50% usage. Benchmark: ~100FPS Benchmark1: ~89-98FPS (98FPS after trying every combination of optimization advice) Benchmark2: ~20FPS. Can't be arsed running this all the way. In cities (Chern) I get ~20-30 FPS, needless to say I'm upset, both GPU and CPU show low usage (see above). Latest beta patch (though this is irrelevant, the patch only increased my FPS by 1)