Cheers for being able to run arma 2 smoothly after upgrading your machine.
But seriously, does BI have some kind of deal with the hardware-industry?
I don´t want to be bitchy but things like "upgrade your pc for 300 $" can´t be the solution for running just one single game. As good as the game itself is.
Alright, i bought this game based on the following information:
Optimal PC Requirements
* CPU: Intel Core 2.8 GHz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or faster
* RAM: 2 GB
* Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT / ATI Radeon 4850 with Shader Model 3 and 512 MB VRAM or faster
* OS: Windows XP or Vista
I tested the demo, that seemed to work ok (no cities and just a few buildings)
And guess what? Yeah right, I spent the last few months on tweaking my machine to get it run at least acceptable on lowest settings. (Thanks to this forum, by the way.)
All this efford although my pc fits the optimal system requirements? Come on.
Don´t get me wrong. This is not a whine-post, but I think not everyone has 300 bucks handy to spend it on this game.
I mean if i know a games requirements are beyond what my machine can handle, i just don´t buy it. Simple as that.
So in the end it feels a little weird, that so many users happily upgrade their machines without criticising the situation.
All folks like me can do now is sit an wait for some future patch to fix stuff.
Shame for such a great game with so much potential.
To make a long story short:
My cheaper solution: Just bought arma 1 for 10 bucks and hang out on the few remaining servers.