Wadi 0 Posted March 31, 2002 This poll is to help my "plane transport needed" thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wadi 0 Posted March 31, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Espectro @ Mar. 31 2002,21:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Sigh<span id='postcolor'> Erm...You're meaning? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USSoldier11B 0 Posted April 1, 2002 Will trade sexual favors for one! (j/k) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
§nake 0 Posted April 1, 2002 A herc would be nice.. accept for the dim fact that the purpose would be to drop a large amount of troops or vehicles.. and since you can only control 12 soldier including yourself in your unit. Whats the point?? I'd like to see some sort of plane that can land in the water.. etc. As those of you experinced with OF know, choppers float But when you turn off their engine, they sink.. yet you won't die unless you disembark. But a water plane would be cool I think... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
STS_SolidSnake 0 Posted April 1, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (§nake @ April 01 2002,08:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">A herc would be nice..  accept for the dim fact that the purpose would be to drop a large amount of troops or vehicles..  and since you can only control 12 soldier including yourself in your unit.  Whats the point?? I'd like to see some sort of plane that can land in the water..  etc.  As those of you experinced with OF know, choppers float     But when you turn off their engine, they sink..  yet you won't die unless you disembark.  But a water plane would be cool I think...<span id='postcolor'> So? the Chinook is 24 men capapbilities, 2 groups, so why not have 5 groups or 6 in a Herc? but i still want my UH-1 and KA-60 Kasatka What UH-1 is in the Movie "We Were Soldiers"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wadi 0 Posted April 1, 2002 Well, I don't like the fact that you can only transport infantry in a Cessna, and even then only three men and the pilot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Espectro (DayZ) 0 Posted April 1, 2002 I think I would stop playing OFP the day cessnas officially can carry m1a1s Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PHY_Hawkeye 0 Posted April 1, 2002 Could the engine support something the size of a C-130? Anyway I just had a thought, If a Herc' is too big, we could get a Dakota (can't rember the designation). I think it would be better for dropping smaller units (ie 12men). Just a thought. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wadi 0 Posted April 1, 2002 See and support the topic "Plane Transport Needed" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
§nake 0 Posted April 1, 2002 If you wanna get that small.. why not a good ol' C-47?? Thats it.. today I am hunting for a good alternate for a C-130C, wish me luck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zak3056 0 Posted April 2, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PHY_Hawkeye @ April 01 2002,20:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Could the engine support something the size of a C-130?<span id='postcolor'> Why not? It supports an LST, after all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USSoldier11B 0 Posted April 2, 2002 Looks like the "in favor" percentage went up five points since I was last here. Good to see. If this does go down. I hope that there will be an ability to jump both ramp and doors. Or at least a ramp that opens and closes. The ramp on the C-130 in DF2 is stuck open and looks really dumb when it is flying. Also, whoever decides to take on this project would have to make sure that the inside of the cargo bay is accurate, along with the "crew chief's seat" (toilet). This thing is basically a box on a platform. (It is extremely difficult to piss on a C-130 becuase of the turbulance). Talk about no privacy it is just out in the open. Although I have seen some that have a wrap around curtain. C-141's are much nicer, they have a commercial airliner style latrine. If anyone decides to undertake this project, let me know I will do anything to help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
§nake 0 Posted April 2, 2002 ah, a fellow DF2 player?? I will never get tired of the games.. for all it's faults.. I've had too much fun. As for th C-130, I'd still like to see it in OF... but in DF2.. all they were good for is A&D... I mean, the damned things would just float in space.. thats it!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wadi 0 Posted April 2, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (§nake @ April 01 2002,21:49)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Thats it..  today I am hunting for a good alternate for a C-130C, wish me luck.  <span id='postcolor'> Good luck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweeper 0 Posted April 2, 2002 Yes hand it over. Me really wants to fly that plane low and fast just like i treat my F-22 in other games. AIRTRANSPORT ready. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
advocatexxx 0 Posted April 2, 2002 I hate to break it to you kiddies, but regardless of how many threads you start on the same topic, BIS will not add the C-130. First I doubt they'll release any additional unit addons to OF, but even if they do, trust me, the C-130 will not be one of them. Don't ask me how I know, I just do. So good luck finding a decent 3rd party designer because let me tell ya, making a well designed, textured and well handling C-130 into the game is no small task : ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wadi 0 Posted April 2, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (advocatexxx @ April 02 2002,16:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I hate to break it to you kiddies, but regardless of how many threads you start on the same topic, BIS will not add the C-130. First I doubt they'll release any additional unit addons to OF, but even if they do, trust me, the C-130 will not be one of them. Don't ask me how I know, I just do. So good luck finding a decent 3rd party designer because let me tell ya, making a well designed, textured and well handling C-130 into the game is no small task : )<span id='postcolor'> Blah, blah, blah - change the record, the pin's stuck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satchel 0 Posted April 2, 2002 I would like a C-130 ingame; it´s big, yes, but also slow, has comparable takeoff-Landing distances to the A-10 and can deploy lots of troops or supplies, also in NOE flying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
STS_SolidSnake 0 Posted April 2, 2002 Whats NOE Flight? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akagi 0 Posted April 2, 2002 That does mean: Nap Of Earth. Very VERY low level flight to avoid enemy Air defence Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USSoldier11B 0 Posted April 3, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I hate to break it to you kiddies, but regardless of how many threads you start on the same topic, BIS will not add the C-130. First I doubt they'll release any additional unit addons to OF, but even if they do, trust me, the C-130 will not be one of them. Don't ask me how I know, I just do. So good luck finding a decent 3rd party designer because let me tell ya, making a well designed, textured and well handling C-130 into the game is no small task <span id='postcolor'> Did you not get held enough as a child? Do you need a hug? Cuz, dude you are one pessimistic guy. Every thread I look at it seems you post something that cuts someone down, ridicules thier ideas, or you make some snide remark. What's the problem? I thought the whole point of having forums was to make one giant think tank for new ideas. Sure, some are a little outrageous but at least these people are being creative instead of having a defeatist attitude. You need to cease fire. As for the rest of us trying to push this issue, we need not heed such rhetoric. FIDO (Fuck It Drive On) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Espectro (DayZ) 0 Posted April 3, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (USSoldier11B @ April 03 2002,05:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I hate to break it to you kiddies, but regardless of how many threads you start on the same topic, BIS will not add the C-130. First I doubt they'll release any additional unit addons to OF, but even if they do, trust me, the C-130 will not be one of them. Don't ask me how I know, I just do. So good luck finding a decent 3rd party designer because let me tell ya, making a well designed, textured and well handling C-130 into the game is no small task <span id='postcolor'> Did you not get held enough as a child? Do you need a hug? Cuz, dude you are one pessimistic guy. Every thread I look at it seems you post something that cuts someone down, ridicules thier ideas, or you make some snide remark. What's the problem? I thought the whole point of having forums was to make one giant think tank for new ideas. Sure, some are a little outrageous but at least these people are being creative instead of having a defeatist attitude. You need to cease fire. As for the rest of us trying to push this issue, we need not heed such rhetoric. FIDO (Fuck It Drive On)<span id='postcolor'> Dont worry. The most of us have learned to ignore him... Just as wobble. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USSoldier11B 0 Posted April 3, 2002 See my thread "C-130 Update" for some interesting news. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites