mrn 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Hi. I thought I had come up with a great way of reducing variables of objects by storing the names and locations in an array then deleting them and setting their vehiclename to nil. Specifically I wanted to get locations for my Dynamic War mission then scrub the logic names so they aren't saved but I still have access to their locations in an array. Now, after a quick experiment I'm either completely fudging something up or the ArmA save gremlins have got their claws deeper than I had hoped for. My testing is something along the lines of (I know, I know, sqs): In one script <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">_logics = [sp1,sp2,sp3,sp4,sp5,sp6,sp7,sp8,sp9,sp10,sp11,sp12] ~0.5 {[_x] exec "logic_array.sqs"} foreach _logics in logic_array.sqs <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE"> _logic = _this select 0 _logic_name = vehicleVarName _logic _logic_xPos = getpos _logic select 0 _logic_yPos = getpos _logic select 1 _logic_zPos = getpos _logic select 2 _local_logic_array = [_logic,_logic_name,[_logic_xPos,_logic_yPos,_logic_zPos]] I can use hint format at this point and it's all there, not in a particular order but I'm still early into this. ie [[sp1,"sp1",[numbers,numbers,numbers]] Now if I run <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">_logics = [sp1,sp2,sp3,sp4,sp5,sp6,sp7,sp8,sp9,sp10,sp11,sp12] ~0.5 {[_x] exec "logic_array.sqs"} foreach _logics ~0.5 if !(isnil ("vehicleVarName _x")) then { _x setVehicleVarName nil;} foreach _logics ~0.5 {deletevehicle _x} foreach _logics I can use hint format at this point and get [[<null object>,scalar bool etc.,[numbers,numbers,numbers]] Woohoo, I thought. Sp1 is no longer "real" so it won't be in the savegame file. Open up the savegame file and sure enough sp1 and all the other variables are still there. While I have a sick kind of enjoyment trying this sort of thing the last few hours have brought me nothing. Am I doing this wrong? Am I misunderstanding something? Is there a way to do what I am after, short of putting loads of positions (50-60) into an array manually? Cheers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
baddo 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Can you not collect the logic objects dynamically? Wouldn't that effectively remove the need to name the logics? Aren't there commands in the ArmA scripting language to get at the logic objects dynamically. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ColonelSandersLite 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Ok, I have to ask first, why? The only practical application I can see here is reducing the savefile size... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrn 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Quote[/b] ]Can you not collect the logic objects dynamically? Wouldn't that effectively remove the need to name the logics? Aren't there commands in the ArmA scripting language to get at the logic objects dynamically. How do you do that then? To be more specific there's also logics I don't want and if I have say 24 logics, 12 may be used by the spawn script, 12 by the location script and I only need locations of the latter 12. I may be making things more complicated than necessary. Quote[/b] ]The only practical application I can see here is reducing the savefile size... Bingo. The more I think about it there are certain things I can do to some of the internal scripts in the mission for the name count but I'd like to significantly expand the location choice, the easiest way of doing this is plonk a logic down. Or, would it make more sense to use something that wouldn't normally be used, a roadcone for example, capture the locations of those then they're easily deleted? The more I ramble on in this post I think I may have solved my own problem, but it still serves as a warning that once declared a variable is probably permanent in the savefile. Cheers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UNN 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Quote[/b] ] The only practical application I can see here is reducing the savefile size... There are others, but it would take this off topic... <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">if !(isnil ("vehicleVarName _x")) then { _x setVehicleVarName nil;} foreach _logics To remove the editor placed, variable names on the logics? You could try: <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">{if !(isnil (Call Compile Format ["%1",vehicleVarName _x])) then {Call Compile Format ["%1=nil",vehicleVarName _x]}} foreach _logics Assuming you placed and named the logics using the mission editor? Not tested the code, so it might need tweaking. JIP and re-spawn not guaranteed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrn 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Thanks for the reply. <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">{if !(isnil (Call Compile Format ["%1",vehicleVarName _x])) then {Call Compile Format ["%1=nil",vehicleVarName _x]}} foreach _logics {if !(#isnil (Call Compile Format ["%1",vehicleVarName error isnil, type object expected string,code I don't understand the whole Call Compile thing so I wouldn't know where to start with that. Quote[/b] ]JIP and re-spawn not guaranteed. Not a problem with me, I wouldn't be in this situation if it was MP. Don't worry too much, I think I've rambled away a fix for my situation but I'd love to know if someone finds a way of getting rid of a variable in a save. Cheers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t_d 47 Posted August 20, 2007 try: <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">{if !(isnil (Format ["%1",vehicleVarName _x])) then {Call Compile Format ["%1=nil",vehicleVarName _x]}} foreach _logics Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UNN 0 Posted August 20, 2007 @T_D thats what I was about to post Quote[/b] ]isnil, type object expected string,code Well if it requires type string or code, then give it what it wants: <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">{if !(isnil (Compile Format ["%1",vehicleVarName _x])) then {Call Compile Format ["%1=nil",vehicleVarName _x]}} foreach _logics Or perhaps: <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">{if !(isnil (Format ["%1",vehicleVarName _x])) then {Call Compile Format ["%1=nil",vehicleVarName _x]}} foreach _logics Quote[/b] ]but I'd love to know if someone finds a way of getting rid of a variable in a save Yes, it would be quite interesting. Edit: Fixed typo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ColonelSandersLite 0 Posted August 21, 2007 Quote[/b] ]The only practical application I can see here is reducing the savefile size... Bingo. Ok, so why would you really care to do that? Currently, my entire saved games folder is about 200 megs and that includes saves from a few campaigns and a whole bucket load of missions. Considering my game folder as a whole is 7.4 gigs (with addons but not counting my seperate arma stuff folder with various zips and utilities which weighs in at 4.21 gigs), I don't know if a few extra megs worth of save data is really worth stressing over. I mean sure, maybe it's technically better to reduce the size of your save file, but unless there's some kind of massive gain, is it really worth your time to do so? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.kju 3245 Posted August 21, 2007 well isn't the savegame bug related to the amount of (global?) variables which need to be saved .. so removing unnecessary variables would be quite important. i ll call sickboy over here to comment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrn 0 Posted August 21, 2007 @ColonelSandersLite Quote[/b] ]I mean sure, maybe it's technically better to reduce the size of your save file, but unless there's some kind of massive gain, is it really worth your time to do so? Yes, I've spent months trying to reduce the save game size. In case it's passed you by, look here. It's all about the variables. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t_d 47 Posted August 21, 2007 @UNN I just wanted to correct a little mistake. isNil requires a string the rest was fine. In your new examples you also have mistakes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UNN 0 Posted August 21, 2007 Quote[/b] ]In your new examples you also have mistakes Yeah, I missed the Call commands from the then statement second time around. Didn't realise, until I read the error Mrn posted, that isNill takes either code or strings. But like I said, I wasn't tested Still don't know if this will actualy remove the variables from the savegame file either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites