Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Tacti-Cool

A3 Poll

How Did you receive the Launch?  

213 members have voted

  1. 1. How Did you receive the Launch?

    • I Enjoy A3, how it is in its current state
      26
    • I Enjoy A3, but think it could have used a little more fine tuning.
      113
    • I am indifferent
      13
    • I dont like A3, and dont think i should have to use mods to finish the game
      12
    • I dont like A3, BIS should have delayed launch for a more stable and varied end product
      49


Recommended Posts

Which sure doesn't say much for this game.

Still at it eh? LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would love to see a Takistan Redux

---------- Post added at 20:13 ---------- Previous post was at 20:13 ----------

Server Hosting Issues has nothing to due with the content of the game, which is what this poll is related to.

considering mods since 1st day of alpha, and a allready 90% functional Arma2/OA port, plus arma2 mods (100% functional when it comes to maps, which suitability quality wise is not even debatable), and the certainty that within the next 24 month the cummunity is going to deliver mountains of quality content ADDITIONAL to what BIS is going to add step by step... i dont even get the point.

arma 3 has two major problems that are threatening to kill its potential success and quality: performance in multiplayer and the overall quality of multiplayer missions and the culture surounding it, lack of content is not even debatable for a literate person. despite that the poll itself relates to the launch of the game, there is nothing that would relate explicitly, not to speak exclusively, to the content of the game as the topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Needs "I enjoy A3, but I don't think I should have to use mods to finish the game" option. Actually, the biggest worry for me is that the game has issues and missing features which have to be addressed within the RV engine itself and cannot be fixed with mods. Still, having fun with this game and a major improvement - in the long run - over A2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Isn't that what HC is for?

No, HC (headless client I presume) is only applicable to Multiplayer. Performance issues are not just limited to MP for everyone. If I simply place down one squad in the editor, compare to it being just me as the player in the editor, I notice at least a drop of 5 FPS + occasional stuttering (like from 45 to anywhere from 40 to 30, sometimes into the 20s). That's in an open field on Altis or Stratis. Not multiplayer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, HC (headless client I presume) is only applicable to Multiplayer. Performance issues are not just limited to MP for everyone. If I simply place down one squad in the editor, compare to it being just me as the player in the editor, I notice at least a drop of 5 FPS + occasional stuttering (like from 45 to anywhere from 40 to 30, sometimes into the 20s). That's in an open field on Altis or Stratis. Not multiplayer.

Ahh okay. I indeed thought you were talking about MP. I only assumed because SP runs so smooth for me personally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×