almanzo 144 Posted September 16, 2013 Hi! Just thought this might be a good idea. A lot of people are having issues with multiplayer due to low fps. This is partly due to the game, but also very dependant on the server running the mission. Therefore, I was thinking that a database of decent servers would be a good idea and a nice point of reference for the community to have, solving a lot of frustration along the way. These will be sorted after mission type: Europe: Wasteland: Domination: Teatime warfare: Warfare: - The Stranger (Norwegian server, high bandwith, good specs) Tactical gameplay/Coop: - Tier1ops public server (random patrol generator mission, good specs, high bandwith, good fps, located in Denmark (note: This is operated by the group I play in, so I might be biased. But the feedback we have gotten has been very good)) America: Wasteland: Domination: Teatime warfare: Warfare: Tactical gameplay/Coop: Asia: Wasteland: Domination: Teatime warfare: Warfare: Tactical gameplay/Coop: Africa: Wasteland: Domination: Teatime warfare: Warfare: Tactical gameplay/Coop: Australia: Wasteland: Domination: Teatime warfare: Warfare: Tactical gameplay/Coop: Feel free to reply with good servers. Remember to include mission type and other relevant info. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maddogx 13 Posted September 16, 2013 Thread moved to the ARMA3 MP section, where it belongs. ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
terox 316 Posted September 16, 2013 this is just going to have anyone posting their server details and certainly shouldnt be taken as that server is stable. Most if not all coop servers running Altis missions with high player counts (35-40 +) are unstable at present Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
almanzo 144 Posted September 16, 2013 this is just going to have anyone posting their server details and certainly shouldnt be taken as that server is stable.Most if not all coop servers running Altis missions with high player counts (35-40 +) are unstable at present I did not think about the fact that people might take advantage of this topic, however, I have played on multiplayer servers with 40+ players whom have been stable. Especially our private server have been performing well, and the norwegian server I mentioned did manage suprisingly well for being public. However, if we can have someone to volunteer to quality check the contributions, we might get on par with the obvious self adverts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites