Col. Kurtz 0 Posted August 5, 2002 Well, the last one was interesting, but ruined by Religion. This is the leader you HATE. Who represents the worst govermeant ever to exist in the 20th/21st century. REMEMBER-20TH AND 21ST ONLY! THEY HAD TO RULE A COUNTRY! THEY CANT HAVE BEEN SOME WHACKED OUT CULT LEADER! THEY DONT COUNT! NO FLAMING! AND THE FIRST PERSON TO BRING RELIGION TO THIS THREAD WILL BE SHOT! If someone disagrees with you, dont retaliate, let them take the heat. Stay cool, have fun. This is not a church! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphwiggum 6 Posted August 5, 2002 Hitler Stalin Ito Hirobumi whoever is PM of Austrailia at this moment(John Howard ?) and collectively, most Republicans in 80s and 90s and now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmy 0 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RalphWiggum @ Aug. 04 2002,11:40)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">and collectively, most Republicans in 80s and 90s and now<span id='postcolor'> amen!!! edit: btw, happy 888th post to me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Col. Kurtz 0 Posted August 5, 2002 Nice number, wait until 999! Yeah, Im in Australia at the moment, and if I could get rid of John Howard, I would! Keep it like this! Nice and cool and happu Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 5, 2002 Hitler and Stalin I will agree with you on, but Republicans!!What about them democrats. I get this feeling that I should not have posted it, but it was to hard to resist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmy 0 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (timmy @ Aug. 04 2002,11:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">amen!!!<span id='postcolor'> oops, sorry about bringing religion to the thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Col. Kurtz 0 Posted August 5, 2002 Dojnt worry Duke of Ray. As long as no Democrates get heated. Attention Democrats! Ignore him! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Albert Schweitzer 10 Posted August 5, 2002 May I draw your attention towards South East asia, china and as well African leaders as well! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkLight 0 Posted August 5, 2002 First of all, i'd really appreciate it if there isn't going to come any flaming outta this, this is my opinion and that's just the way it is. I'm not flaming on the countries so don't feel offended. Ok, here it goes, the person i can't stand is Bush. I know, i know, everyone'll say that i'm starting a flamewar and that i hate america, well all of that is bs. As far as i know i have the right to say my opinion, right? Why i don't like him? In my eyes it looks like he only cares about wars, he just wants to fight other countries. He doesn't care about nature at all. Every excuse for starting a fight is good for him. Anywayz, i'm not gonna say more about this cuz it'll only start flamewars. Plz do remember that there's no reason at all to start flaming. If you hate the leader of my country i wouldn't flame on you so please don't flame on me. (actually i hate that *beep*ing monarchy ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 Pol Pot. One of the most diabolical mass murderers of the 20th century and often forgoten. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted August 5, 2002 I'm going to skip the Hitler,Stalin,Pol Pot.. etc that are obviously hard to compete with, and focus instead on today's leaders. My nominees for today's worst leaders would be W. Bush, Berlusconi and of course Haider, Le Pen and some other European bigots. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 Galiteri, took Argentina to war with Britain, ruined the country. There have been so many terrible leaders, we'll never get them all here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Albert Schweitzer 10 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Aug. 05 2002,12:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">W. Bush<span id='postcolor'> Now that is a bit exaggerated no? What about Mugabe? What about Sharon and Arafat? (Le pen is not a leader), what about Pirapaharan, the leader of the Tamil Tigers? What about Isaias, Eritrea What about Saddam Hussein What about Pol Pod? !!! (Mr. savagery of Cambodia) What about Kabila (Congo - Zaire) What about Kim Jong Il (N.C) What about Gaddafi? What about Václav Havel (Czeck Republic) considers genocide of german civillians after WWII as justified. What about -please enter current name of leader of ethiopia-? What about -please enter current name of leader of Argentina-? I dont know where to stop?.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted August 5, 2002 Albert: As I said in my post, I'll skip the serious bastards and stick to 'normal' politicians. Paratrooper: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Galiteri, took Argentina to war with Britain, ruined the country. <span id='postcolor'> Maggie, took Britain to war with Argentina, ruined the country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Aug. 05 2002,13:25)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Albert: As I said in my post, I'll skip the serious bastards and stick to 'normal' politicians. Paratrooper: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Galiteri, took Argentina to war with Britain, ruined the country. <span id='postcolor'> Maggie, took Britain to war with Argentina, ruined the country.<span id='postcolor'> Don't start this! Â Â Maggie was responding to aggression, she didn't start the war. Britain was NOT ruined by Thatcher. Infact Britain was made many times stronger than when she took office. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Albert Schweitzer 10 Posted August 5, 2002 Paratrooper I dont really know if what you are saying is correct! Dont forget that during this time Germany was extremely profiting from the world economic boom and boosted it GDP. Furthermore did it establish european wide boundaries with other nations. THe UK had the same preconditions but did not make use of them. Thatcher was overproud, arrogant and too conservative. One thing I remember is that during the discussion whether european leaders would accept the reunification of Germany, Thatcher was holding a map in her hands of Germany before WWI and said: I see, that is what they want to get back, dont they?" THis is the disadvantage of backward thinking! I hav no problems that she had problems with Germany but instead she could have used the time to step from her British throne of arrogance and start restructuring your primary sector industries! How long did it take to get rid of your coal mining industries. Well those un-lucrative mines existed longer than she was in power. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo 29 Posted August 5, 2002 I lived through Thatcher's Britain, I hated her then and I hate her now. I can't wait for the day she dies. This country was a horrible dark depressing angry place while she was prime minister. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Aug. 05 2002,13:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Paratrooper I dont really know if what you are saying is correct! Dont forget that during this time Germany was extremely profiting from the world economic boom and boosted it GDP. Furthermore did it establish european wide boundaries with other nations. THe UK had the same preconditions but did not make use of them. Thatcher was overproud, arrogant and too conservative. One thing I remember is that during the discussion whether european leaders would accept the reunification of Germany, Thatcher was holding a map in her hands of Germany before WWI and said: I see, that is what they want to get back, dont they?" THis is the disadvantage of backward thinking! I hav no problems that she had problems with Germany but instead she could have used the time to step from her British throne of arrogance and start reconstructuring your primary sector industries!<span id='postcolor'> Thatcher rid the country of the strangulating grip of over-powerful unions, without her ridding us of state industry we would not have the economy of today, it wasn't just a europe-wide boom, reform was desperatly needed! As for the Germany bit, she was against comunist dictatorships, so I doubt she had a problem with German re-unification. She did have a problem with the EU scrambling for power, she called it the Belgian Empire! As for developing our industries, no one person has done as much for our economic well being. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (placebo @ Aug. 05 2002,13:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I lived through Thatcher's Britain, I hated her then and I hate her now. I can't wait for the day she dies. This country was a horrible dark depressing angry place while she was prime minister.<span id='postcolor'> If you think Foot would be better than you are mad! We would be feeble and broke! As I said before, the reforms were painful but neccessary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo 29 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Aug. 05 2002,12:59)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Thatcher rid the country of the strangulating grip of over-powerful unions, without her ridding us of state industry we would not have the economy of today<span id='postcolor'> Each time you spout that do you know how much you sound like the text book you took it from? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (placebo @ Aug. 05 2002,14:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Aug. 05 2002,12:59)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Thatcher rid the country of the strangulating grip of over-powerful unions, without her ridding us of state industry we would not have the economy of today<span id='postcolor'> Each time you spout that do you know how much you sound like the text book you took it from?<span id='postcolor'> They are my own words. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 What text book has political bias anyway? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo 29 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Aug. 05 2002,13:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">They are my own words.<span id='postcolor'> Words forming an opinion based on what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paratrooper 0 Posted August 5, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (placebo @ Aug. 05 2002,14:57)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Aug. 05 2002,13:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">They are my own words.<span id='postcolor'> Words forming an opinion based on what?<span id='postcolor'> Fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo 29 Posted August 5, 2002 And you got these facts from? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites