This would make a great movie ;)

[Longinius 1]

To all living under the shadow of 911 and the "War on Terror":

I am David Bosankoe of Bristol, England. A few months ago the

American Department of Defence released to the World Media the five

security-camera (CCTV) frames that capture the attack on the Pentagon

in Arlington, Virginia that occurred on September 11, 2001. These

frames were broadcast across the Internet News agencies where I was

able to pick them up and enlarge them, after which I joined them

together in a single animation file:

http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/pentagon.gif - approx 160kb.

My attention was initially brought to these frames as I was searching

for evidence in support of my position in an argument with Dick

Eastman, an American who regularly posts his analysis, forwardings

and links to uk.politics.crime and other newsgroups. We were arguing

over the French web page, "Spot the Boeing,":

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numer.../erreurs_en.htm

Eastman was expounding his theory of an internally planted bomb and,

to show him his error I went to the BBC and did a search

for 'Pentagon' and found the CCTV images. That's when I made my first

animation from the frames.

Shortly before, American investigator, 'Agent Fescado,' provided on

the website, http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/pent.html,

his own analysis of the CCTV stills based on evidence that included

his own enlargement of the first frame in the sequence with added

overlays of different aircraft, using the position and size of the

tail fin of the actual attack craft shown in the first frame as the

reference for determining scale and position.

What he found was that the profile of the plane in the frame when

compared to the fitted overlay of a Boeing 757 where the tail fin of

the overlay exactly covers the visible fin of the attack aircraft,

was far too short to be a Boeing 757 (a rather obvious observation

which nevertheless I later proved with mathematical rigor on my web

site). What Fescado also found was a tail-fin fitted overlay of an F-

16 made for a very reasonable fit, as also do other small military

aircraft such as S-3B Viking (a craft which has been suggested by one

of Agent Fescado's sources as the true Pentagon-attack culprit.).

Which small military aircraft was responsible, is a question that

must not distract from the now-established finding that the Boeing

757 of Flight 77 was not the aircraft that the CCTV visually

captured, an aircraft which in my estimation is less than half the

length of the 757).

Afterward, I found the Internet source for the MSNBC Flash animation

of the CCTV images and extracted the Flash file out of their page,

allowing me to use the inbuilt zoom function in Flash which includes

a pixel interpolation function so I could quickly extract smoothed

pictures. I've explained how to trace my steps in all this and 'do it

yourself' at:

http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/howto.htm

I then used a shareware version of Jasc Animation Shop to string this

together in an 'animated GIF' which so many have now seen thanks to

Dick Eastman.

When comparing proportions in the first frame, the height of the

Pentagon's wall, 70 feet, with the 155 feet length of the Boeing 757,

it becomes blatantly obvious that actual attack plane is too small.

This finding led me on to the size of the hole that the plane made.

When the plane first crashed into the Pentagon, it first of all it

made merely a hole and only later, after fire crews had arrived on

the scene, did the wall of Pentagon above this hole collapse.

Fortunately, someone who was on the nearby freeway and passing the

Pentagon at during the first moments of the attack had his camera

with him and managed to get some really good shots of this hole (see

my homepage:http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/ ). The size of this

hole is surprising. I approximate it to be between two and three

meters in across. Not only was the hole too small for a Boeing 757,

there was also virtually no plane wreckage. The wings were nowhere to

be seen. There was no luggage, seats, or debris that one expects from

this type of crash.

Later, I saw the damage report on the extent of the internal damage.

That too was inconsistent with an mid-sized airliner crash.

But that is just the beginning. In the first CCTV image a white smoke

trail is visible to the right following the plane. However, the

problem is that jet contrails only happen at high altitudes when the

water vapor from a jet's exhaust freezes into a trail of visible ice

crystals. So the only explanation of this white smoke is that it is

the rocket-engine emission of a small missile. This conclusion is

supported by the evidence in the second image, where the initial

fireball is more of a flash explosion consistent with that of a small

missile warhead. So on two counts of visual evidence it can be said

that a missile was launched at the Pentagon just before impact of the

attacking plane.

So in conclusion, instead of knife-armed terrorists with limited

flight experience hijacking a modern passenger plane and flying it in

to the Pentagon at ground level, we are forced to the conclusion that

a military jet with auto pilot capabilities flew into to Pentagon,

firing a missile just ahead of impact.

Also remarkable is the choice of the point impact, a point only

metres away from the only fire hydrant on that side of the building.

This was the hydrant for the heliport, with underground tanks, in

case of helicopter crashes. (Again see my homepage.) Whoever planned

the attack likely was thinking of damage limitation.

So, knowing that the attack craft was not a Boeing, it is abundantly

clear to me that the US Government has lied to us about Sept 11th. I

can only conclude that they did the deed themselves as a propaganda

operation to 'justify' to the American people (and their allies)

their sought-for war against the Taliban and 'War on Terrorism.' From

other people's investigations it has become clear that this was all

done for oil and opium and geopolitical gain, and NOT to liberate the

women of that country from restricted Islamic lifestyles (a worthy

enough cause, but certainly not a decisive motive for the war.)

Let that sink in a minute.......

It certainly took me a while to get it into my head.

My own line of 911 research has been has been restricted to the

Pentagon attack. However, I have added many links and articles to my

web site referencing investigations parallel to my own, including,

especially, questions raised by the World Trade Center attack. There

are many questions that the US Government should be answering about

that. Among the most notable I can recall are these:

"Why was there a big increase in insider trading just before the

attack?",

"Why were CEO's from the WTC invited to a charity dinner at around

8am on the morning of Sept 11 at an air base?" and

"Why did the twin tower collapse the way they did (like a controlled

demolition, falling straight down and not toppling over)"?

Dick Eastman, at my request, has provided me with his own summary

points:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

I. MOTIVES:

1. getting the pipeline the Taliban had rejected;

2. control of the mineral wealth of Afganistan;

3. generating a popular and sufficient reason to attack Saddam

Heussein (whom both father and son Bush have long wanted to see dead);

4. continued sustainability of the infamous "ring" of Afghan opium

becoming Chinese heroin becoming laundered revenue proceeds becoming

investment capital building new Chinese industry forcing the

relocation of industry away from U.S. territory;

5. big money for the FBI, CIA, military industrial complex;

6. Destruction of wtc-housed evidence in the biggest-ever illegal oil

swap case;

7. destruction of wtc-housed evidence in the biggest-ever gold price

fixing case (illegal selling of Federal Reserve gold to elites at way

below obtainable market prices);

8. Getting the FBI off white collar and bank crime (i.e. introducing

total anarchy to the sphere in which the U.S. investment bankers,

currency traders, derivatives makers etc. operate);

9. Having the CIA ("Capitalism's Invisible Army" as R. Buckminster

Fuller called it) take over the FBI (the more legitimate and

traditionally constitutional of Federal investigation and

intelligence agencies) and in so doing purging the FBI of leadership

symnpathetic with anti-globalist, populist, nationalist,

constitutionalist, or pro-sovereignty thinking -- in fact it is the

druglords taking over the constabulary; and lastest,

10. Accomplishing pre-emptive war set-up to look like retalitory self-

defence, i.e., picking fights, against all "potential" terrorists by

setting-up the those suspected of being capable of resorting to

terror, actually conducting terror themselves so they can pin the

blame on those they want to decimate, those who stand in the way of

their economic and geopolitical dominance.

II. Remote-control crashes:

EgyptAir flight 10.31.99 -- clear case of remote-control takover;

data captured on blackbox voice recorder and on instument recorder

make it unmistakable that the plane was taken over against the will

of pilot and co-pilot (a voice -- English, not Arabic, actually is

heard in the voice recorder saying "control it" at the moment the

controls begin to misbehave -- the efforts to refute this have only

landed the government in deeper in a coverup --EgyptAir and th

Egyptian government accept this view and not the obviously cooked

findings of the U.S. review board.)

New York flight in Queens -- breaks up in air -- after rudder begins

moving first right and left -- breaking off the tail fin -- another

whitewash by U.S. aviation officials as well.

Miami Flight -- rudder goes wild on its own, then stops. This was

a "test" of the remote-controlsystems.

Ron Brown's crash in Croatia -- same deal, and then, to make sure Ron

Brown got a bullet in the head by the first "rescuers on the scene.

The Plane that hit the South tower. Note the Japanese video showing

another aircraft streak by at the moment of impact -- presumably a

guidance aircraft or a missile to do the job in case the plane missed

its intended target. (very little data on this besides the video

itself, so we tend to leave it alone, but it is definitely part of

the big picture.

III. Pentagon "small jet"

This is the "smoking gun" that could finish the crime syndicate

responsible for 911 -- unfortunately the crime syndicate knows this

very well and the American people have hardly begun to get the word.

1. DoD video -- the Bosankoe evidence

2. small hole -- the French evidence and the photo from the freeway

3. witness accounts -- those who saw a horizontal approach claim the

plane was too small to be a Boeing 757 -- many military men who did

not see said they heard a jet fighter, some heard a missile.

4. Air traffic controllers claim plane behaved like a military jet.

IV. STANDDOWNS

1. Intelligence -- FBI prevented from investigating (after merger

with the CIA they won't even try, btw)

2. Air interceptions -- could have, but didn't -- ordered not to --

many many sources on this; many officials (Cheney, Rumsfeld) caught

in falsehoods

VI. Phony bin Laden video (Dick says: I have lots of analysis of this

that are on no site that I know of -- I had forgotten this until now)

VII: Evidence of prior planning and attempts to enlist other nations

in war against Afganistan pre-911 (Powell in India, most especially;

but many others)

And the lesser stuff:

Bush's behavior on the day and subsequently.Rice's statements before

911.Wolfowitz lightening appraisal and conclusion that war on

Afganistan is necessary.Economic links of Bush, Cheney etc. to

profiteering from exactly this war.The short-sells and where they

lead.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am at a loss as to suggest where to go next, but I will leave you

with this. Enough pressure of disclosures has been brought to bear on

the US Government to warrant Congressional hearings into facts

surrounding the events of Sept 11th. Such hearings are already

starting THIS WEEK in private sessions and later will be opened to

the public/media.

The Committee chairmen will however try to limit the scope of the

investigation to "intelligence failures" and will certainly attempt

to overlook the overwhelming evidence of the small-plane attack of

the Pentagon as well as many other pertinent pieces of information .

It is up to you, you who have checked the Pentagon-attack evidence

presented here to let the US Government know that they can no longer

hide from the truth and that those who continue to evade these

questions will be seen as collaborators in the worst crime of this

century.

David Bosankoe, BSc. (Computer Science).

Forwarded:

THE TRUTH ON WTC/911

Why doesn't anyone have the guts to just come

out and say what many people know:

There were NO Arab "hijackers" on the planes

(I have the passenger lists and have reviewed them

from more than one source);

the flight school propaganda was just an attempt at

advance cover-up for guys to whom such a mission

could not even be entrusted;

the planes were controlled remotely from the ground

by technology that has been around for years;

the planes were used to cover up for the internal

explosives planted previously to be detonated at

the "right time";

Bin Laden had nothing to do with it, but has been

a long-time CIA agent who was used as a convenient

scapegoat to "justify" actions by the ruling elite to

further its agenda of imposing a worldwide police

state that would also include the US;

24 of Bin Laden's family members were secretly

escorted out of the country after 9/11 events under

federal protection, which would not have happened

if he had been the real culprit;

Bush slipped up twice in public speeches and

admitted seeing the first plane hit, which he did by

virtue of cameras set up by fed. agents to give him

a direct feed in Florida, where he feigned surprise,

horror and sorrow;

the whole deal was an inside one;

anyone who knows anything about demolitions

knows how the buildings went down in NYC, DC and

OKC (in 1995), where federally-programmed patsy

McVeigh drove a truck near the building to cover for

the internal explosives that were not set by him

[Guest]

*caugh* yes *caugh* that's what the aliens told me too when they anal probed me *caugh*

[Longinius 1]

But it WOULD make a great movie

[Warin 0]

I think someone needs to put their tinfoil hat back on

I suppose all of the eye witnesses that saw the aircraft crash into the building were bought off by the government....or are CIA operatives.

Isnt this like the 5th or 6th time this has been brought up?

This guy is obviously a crackpot. I love reading this just for the sheer leaps in logic that are performed!

[Longinius 1]

Same topic, more advanced theory

[ralphwiggum 6]

geeze..didn't that Osama guy admit that he did it?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">David Bosankoe, BSc. (Computer Science).

<span id='postcolor'>

yup, another idiot revealed.

[Placebo 28]

No matter the accent bollocks is still bollocks

[Hilandor 1]

i bet if they look really close with the latest software elvis was on a cloud with a remote control