Planetside

Men Of War has this problem too. It's so annoying.

I bet the average Czech can't even afford a PC capable of running ArmA 3.

play them and find out for yourself. the last question's answer is coop.

Runs like garbage, looks like garbage, it's too hard and too expensive to make animations, every time I join a server it just feels hacked together. I'm disappointed. Plus the mouse movement isn't smooth because the game runs like garbage. By the way, development costs are overstated because the developer is based in a country where programmers are paid as much as janitors are in the west.

It still runs horribly? I was assuming that it was my CPU bottlenecking me, but no its just the game I guess?:confused:

I have a 7870 @ 1080p. Also, its a original bulldozer. A haswell CPU blows it out of the water since ArmA only uses 3-4 cores well no matter what clock speed its running at.

I'm not joking. I used to own a Sabertooth 990FX with a FX-8120 overclocked to 4.5Ghz. I don't notice much difference when playing with a ASUS Z87A and a Intel i5 4670k at its turbo speed of 3.8Ghz. I spent close to $475 on this upgrade and its funny that ArmA3 doesn't benefit as much as I thought it would. What else do you want to know? I have a 7200RPM hard drive and 8GB's of DDR3 @ 1600Mhz.

If it means anything, when I played on the 8120, not more than 20% of my cpu was used, now it uses only 50% of each core.

I don't like people trying and failing to justify this. They are definitely not a indie studio, they are a successful game studio with multiple products and even better, BI Simulations has military contracts. They should be able to solve this, plus the cost of their product in comparison to where they are based gives them a significant profit advantage.

Does it still run horribly? I have not played it for months.

Crysis 3, if you count virtual future soldier programs.

Are you implying that opinion polls are not relevant to customer demand, if so can you prove it? You aren't even relevant either, since the question was not directed at you. TOH's flight model doesn't even rival HTR imho lol.

So why won't BI add HTR? BI? Quite obviously it would only benefit the game judging from the user poll.

Steam survey isn't relevant because the majority of users couldn't even play ArmA3.

They have not confirmed that either afaik.

BI won't add it judging from fred64's reply.

Hahaha "stop spreading lies". 6 Core CPU is hardly exotic.

Enjoying the CPU utilization, I was killed in PvP because a guy bounced out from a rock within 2 frames and I had no time to stop it, plus I couldn't aim due to the absurd mouse lag.

ArmA never uses more than 1.5gb for me.

I'm new to addons because I only make missions. Basically I can't find anything on how I'd make the addon automatically run something when the player is alive. I'd like to think its as simple as a waituntil and a loop but I don't know where. There is barely anything on the wiki and I've searched all over. I just want to make a simple script addon.. I'm pretty sure this involves a init.sqf file, but I've tried making a init.sqf file and it didn't do anything. What am I missing?

cheers

Prove it.

Too bad. The game is fucked and sure enough, its not my fault. Because 1 cpu core being half utilized isn't my fault, that is the developers fault. I honestly don't care what you think because every night you come into this thread and shove your massive ego around in order to somehow impress the people who actually have issues with the game. What is your goal/end game here? Obviously if there are 100 pages in this single thread your opinion is meaningless and the wider majority are having fps issues. Its not just AMD users you fool. Intel users are also having the same issues, i7 users are having issues. Because the CPU isn't properly utilized, the more you do the less it utilizes your CPU and GPU. It makes no sense. "Oh yeah I get playable FPS with my overclocked i5 2500K", yet it still utilizes only a fraction of the CPU's power and thus you are only getting marginable performance out of your expensive hardware. If you're going to defend that then please do us a favour and leave.

Somehow I feel that we may never get what fred64 has proposed.

90% of the CPU is not utilized, only 1 core uses 60%. ---------- Post added at 02:48 ---------- Previous post was at 02:47 ---------- ArmA2OA certainly did not run that well. It ran better than ArmA3, but still bad.